[1]张力鹏,黄修菊,林玉婷.乌鲁木齐地区正常妊娠妇女和不同次数自然流产妇女TORCH感染比较[J].医学信息,2018,31(17):155-157.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.17.049]
　ZHANG Li-peng,HUANG Xiu-ju,LIN Yu-ting.Comparison of TORCH Infection between Normal Pregnant Women and Women with Different Times of Spontaneous Abortion in Urumqi Area[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(17):155-157.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.17.049]
点击复制

乌鲁木齐地区正常妊娠妇女和不同次数自然流产妇女TORCH感染比较()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
31卷
期数:
2018年17期
页码:
155-157
栏目:
诊疗技术
出版日期:
2018-09-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of TORCH Infection between Normal Pregnant Women and Women with Different Times of Spontaneous Abortion in Urumqi Area
文章编号:
1006-1959（2018）17-0155-03
作者:
张力鹏1; 黄修菊1; 林玉婷2
1.新疆医科大学第一附属医院妇科中心，新疆 乌鲁木齐 830054； 2.新疆维吾尔自治区妇幼保健院检验科，新疆 乌鲁木齐 830001
Author(s):
ZHANG Li-peng1; HUANG Xiu-ju1; LIN Yu-ting2
1.Department of Gynaecology Center,the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830054,Xinjiang,China; 2.Department of Clinical Laboratory,the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Maternal and Child Health CareHospital,Urumqi 830001,Xin
关键词:
TORCH感染; 正常妊娠; 自然流产
Keywords:
Key words：TORCH infection; Normal pregnancy; Spontaneous abortion
分类号:
R714.21
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.17.049
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较乌鲁木齐正常妊娠妇女和不同自然流产次数妇女血清TORCH感染情况。方法 选取我院420例正常妊娠组妇女、451例1~2次流产组妇女和430例≥3次流产组妇女，采用ELISA法检测血清中特异性TORCH系列，包括弓形虫、巨细胞病毒、风疹病毒、单纯疱疹病毒IgM并比较其阳性率。结果 正常妊娠组TOX、CMV、RUV、HSV IgM阳性率分别为2.62%、5.24%、3.10%、6.67%，阳性率合计为17.62%；1~2次流产组妇女中上述抗体阳性率分别为7.10%、9.53%、7.76%、13.53%，阳性率合计为37.92%；≥3次流产组妇女上述抗体阳性率分别为3.49%、4.42%、3.95%、7.44%，阳性率合计为19.30%。1~2次流产组女性TORCH感染高于正常妊娠组（P＜0.05），而≥3次流产组妇女TORCH感染与正常妊娠组比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 有1~2次自然流产的女性流产发生可能与TORCH感染有关，≥3次自然流产的女性流产发生与TORCH感染无明显相关性，可能与其它因素有关。建议在孕前进行TORCH感染筛查，尤其是对1~2次自然流产的女性，应重点筛查，做好孕期预防保健工作，以提高优生优育质量。
Abstract:
Abstract：Objective To compare the serum TORCH infection in women with normal pregnancy and women with different spontaneous abortions in Urumqi.Methods A total of 420 normal pregnant women,451 women with 1 to 2 spontaneous abortions and 430 women with≥3 spontaneous abortions were enrolled in our hospital.Serum specific TORCH series Toxoplasma gondii,cytomegalovirus,rubella virus,herpes simplex virus IgM were detected by ELISA and their positive rates were compared.Results The positive rates of TOX,CMV,RUV and HSV IgM in normal pregnancy group were 2.62%,5.24%,3.10% and 6.67%,respectively.The positive rate was 17.62%;the positive rate of these antibodies in women in 1~2 abortion groups was 7.10%,9.53%,7.76%,13.53%,and the positive rate was 37.92%;The positive rates of these antibodies in≥3 abortion women were 3.49%,4.42%,3.95% and 7.44%,respectively,and the positive rate was 19.30%.The TORCH infection in females in 1 to 2 abortion group was higher than that in normal pregnancy group(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference in TORCH infection between women in≥3 abortion groups compared with normal pregnancy group(P>0.05). Conclusion Female with 1 or 2 spontaneous abortions may be associated with TORCH infection.Female with≥3 spontaneous abortions have no significant correlation with TORCH infection,which may be related to other factors.It is recommended to screen for TORCH infection before pregnancy,especially for women with 1 to 2 spontaneous abortions,and should focus on screening and prevent pregnancy and health care during pregnancy to improve the quality of prenatal and postnatal care.

参考文献/References:

[1]Zeng QL,Yao MY.Progress of integrative medical treatment of recurrent natural abortion induced by immune factor[J].Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western-medicine,2010,30(6):669-771. [2]黄志英.TORCH感染与自然流产的相关性研究[J].世界临床医学,2015,9(6):55. [3]孙开琳.妊娠早期弓形虫感染与自然妊娠先兆流产的关系[J].中国实用医药,2014,9(1):97. [4]胥数.TORCH感染与自然流产的相关因素分析[J].中国医药指南,2016,14(35):169-170. [5]雷娟.皖西地区500例孕妇Torch检测结果分析[J].菏泽医学专科学校学报,2014,26(1):30-31. [6]符梅,徐克惠.复发性自然流产夫妇的病因分析[J].中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2016,12(4):395-400. [7]彭扬洋,朱功民,范海宁,等.自然流产患者TORCH检验的结果分析[J].现代生物医学进展,2015,15(19):3707-3710. [8]张建平.复发性流产诊治的专家共识[J].中华妇产科杂志,2016,51(1):1-4. [9]王甲甲,王智斌,黄文芳.TORCH病原体感染与自然流产的关系及影响因素[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2015,7(7):49-52. [10]Sen MR,Shukla BN,Tuhina B.Prevalence of serunl antibodies to TORCH infection in and around Varanasi,Northemlndia[J].Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research,2012,6(9):1483-1485. [11]Neu N,Duchon J,Zachariah P.TORCH infections[J].Clin Perinatol,2015,42(1):77-103. [12]张涌.乌鲁木齐地区3265例孕妇TORCH感染的调查分析[J].中国优生与遗传杂,2007,15(3):54-55.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-09-01