[1]闫 军,寇旭东,马 博,等.Hem-o-lok结扎锁和Endoloop套扎在 腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(18):83-85.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.18.025]
　YAN Jun,KOU Xu-dong,MA Bo,et al.Clinical Study of Hem-o-lok Ligation Lock and Endoloop Ligation in Laparoscopic Appendectomy[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(18):83-85.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.18.025]
点击复制

Hem-o-lok结扎锁和Endoloop套扎在 腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床研究()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
31卷
期数:
2018年18期
页码:
83-85
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2018-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Study of Hem-o-lok Ligation Lock and Endoloop Ligation in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
文章编号:
1006-1959（2018）18-0083-03
作者:
闫 军; 寇旭东; 马 博; 努尔买买提
新疆医科大学第二附属医院普外科，新疆 乌鲁木齐 830000
Author(s):
YAN Jun; KOU Xu-dong; MA Bo; Nurmamat
Department of General Surgery,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830000,Xinjiang,China
关键词:
阑尾炎; 腹腔镜; Hem-o-lok结扎锁; Endoloop套扎
Keywords:
Key words：Appendicitis; Laparoscopy; Hem-o-lok ligation lock; Endoloop ligation
分类号:
R656.8
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.18.025
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 在腹腔镜下阑尾炎切除术中比较Hem-o-lok结扎锁和 Endoloop套扎处理阑尾根部的手术效果。方法 2017年5月~2018年5月对我院120例成人急性阑尾炎患者实施腹腔镜下阑尾切除术，根据手术方法分为H组和E组，每组60例。H组采用Hem-o-lok结扎锁对阑尾根部处理，E组采用Endoloop套扎阑尾根部，并比较两组患者手术时间、住院时间、手术费用、手术并发症等情况。结果 H组手术时间（42.83±6.52）min，住院时间（4.23±0.78）d，手术费用（4273.6±51.22）元，手术并发症4例（6.66%）。E组手术时间（46.10±7.07）min，住院时间（4.17±0.70）d，手术费用（5137.2±83.17）元，手术并发症6例（10.00%）。两组患者病理类型、住院时间、手术并发症的发生率比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），而E组患者的手术时间、住院的手术费高于H组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 Hem-o-lok结扎锁和 Endoloop套扎均可以在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中安全有效的处理阑尾炎根部，但使用Hem-o-lok结扎锁的手术时间更短，手术相关费用更低，具有很好的运用前景。
Abstract:
Abstract：Objective To compare the surgical outcomes of Hem-o-lok ligation lock and Endoloop ligation in the root of appendix during laparoscopic appendicitis resection.Methods From May 2017 to May 2018,120 patients with acute appendicitis in our hospital underwent laparoscopic appendectomy.According to the surgical method,they were divided into H group and E group,60 in each group.The H group was treated with Hem-o-lok ligation lock for the root of the appendix.The E group was treated with Endoloop for the root of the appendix.The operation time,hospitalization time,operation cost and surgical complications of the two groups were compared.Results The operation time of group H was(42.83±6.52)min,the length of hospital stay was(4.23±0.78)d,the operation cost was(4273.6±51.22) yuan,and the operation complications were 4 cases（6.66%）.The operation time of group E was(46.10±7.07)min,the length of hospital stay was (4.17±0.70)d,the operation cost was(5137.2±83.17)yuan,and the operation complications were 6 cases（10.00%）.There was no significant difference in the pathological type,length of hospital stay,and incidence of surgical complications between the two groups(P>0.05).The operation time and hospitalization cost of patients in group E were higher than those in group H,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Hem-o-lok ligation lock and Endoloop ligation are safe and effective in the treatment of appendicitis root in laparoscopic appendectomy,but the use of Hem-o-lok ligation lock shorter operation time,surgery-related costs lower,has a good application prospects.

参考文献/References:


[1]Takada T,Nishiwaki H,Yamamoto Y,et al.The Role of Digital Rectal Examination for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J].Plos One,2015,10(9):e0136996.
[2]Masoomi H,Nguyen NT,Dolich MO,et al.Laparoscopic appendectomy trends and outcomes in the United States: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample(NIS),2004-2011[J].American Surgeon,2014,80(10):1074-1077.
[3]Robinson JR,Carter NH,Gibson C,et al.Improving the Value of Care for Appendectomy Through an Individual Surgeon-Specific Approach[J].Journal of Pediatric Surgery,2018.
[4]Altemimi MH,Berglin MA,Kim EG,et al.Endostapler versus hem-o-lok clip to secure the appendiceal stump and mesoappendix during laparoscopic appendectomy[J].American Journal of Surgery,2017,214(6):1143-1148.
[5]Delibegovi S,Mehmedovic Z.The influence of the different forms of appendix base closure on patient outcome in laparoscopic appendectomy:a randomized trial[J].Surgical Endoscopy,2017,32(5):1-5.
[6]Wilson M,Maniam P,Ibrahim A,et al.Polymeric clips are a quicker and cheaper alternative to endoscopic ligatures for securing the appendiceal stump during laparoscopic appendicectomy[J].Ann R Coll Sury Engl,2018,100(6):454-458.

相似文献/References:

[1]王 丹.腹腔镜子宫全切除术与开腹手术的临床效果分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(03):105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.03.034]
　WANG Dan.Analysis of Clinical Effects between Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Open Hysterectomy[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(18):105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.03.034]
[2]李华桥.腹腔镜联合胃镜行胃间质瘤切除术对胃间质瘤患者 术后康复及并发症的影响分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(05):114.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.039]
　LI Hua-qiao.Effect of Laparoscopy Combined with Gastroscopy for Gastric Stromal Tumor Resection on Postoperative Rehabilitation and Complications of Gastric Stromal Tumor Patients[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(18):114.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.039]
[3]李建勇.腹腔镜下手术治疗卵巢巧克力囊肿研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(12):57.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.018]
　LI Jian-yong.Laparoscopic Surgery for Ovarian Chocolate Cysts[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(18):57.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.018]
[4]夏易曼娜,李虎成.腹腔镜下宫颈癌根治术与传统开腹手术的对比研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(12):115.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.036]
　XIA Yi-manna,LI Hu-cheng.Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Cervical Cancer and Traditional Open Surgery[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(18):115.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.036]
[5]张东霞,李文超,白雨昕.腹腔镜下异位妊娠病灶清除术的治疗效果及对患者炎性反应指标和术后恢复的影响[J].医学信息,2022,35(11):121.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.11.031]
　ZHANG Dong-xia,LI Wen-chao,BAI Yu-xin.Effect of Laparoscopic Removal of Ectopic Pregnancy and its influence on Inflammatory Response Indexes and Postoperative Recovery[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(18):121.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.11.031]
[6]刘秀娟,刘 辉.子宫内膜异位症相关性不孕的诊断及治疗研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(14):35.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.14.012]
　LIU Xiu-juan,LIU Hui.Diagnosis and Treatment of Endometriosis Related Infertility[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(18):35.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.14.012]
[7]张 磊,张学军.腹腔镜与开腹胰十二指肠切除术临床疗效单中心回顾性研究[J].医学信息,2019,32(02):118.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.02.033]
　ZHANG Lei,ZHANG Xue-jun.A Single-center Retrospective Study of Clinical Efficacy of Laparoscopic and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(18):118.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.02.033]
[8]韦 林,赵军玲,宾 力,等.异位妊娠腹腔镜镜像与TVS表现及 血清β-HCG表达的相关性研究[J].医学信息,2019,32(12):85.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.026]
　WEI Lin,ZHAO Jun-ling,BIN Li,et al.Correlation Research between Laparoscopic Mirror Image of Ectopic Pregnancy and TVS Expression and Serum β-HCG Expression[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(18):85.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.026]
[9]王 蕾,苏华斌,肖冠英,等.急性阑尾炎合并艾滋病患者临床病理特点及其对手术方式的影响[J].医学信息,2018,31(20):45.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.20.014]
　WANG Lei,SU Hua-bin,XIAO Guan-ying,et al.Clinicopathological Features of Acute Appendicitis Complicated with AIDS and its Effect on Surgical Methods[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(18):45.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.20.014]
[10]姚文超,彭继红.腹腔镜下电凝阻断子宫动脉在无生育要求患者子宫肌瘤剔除术中的应用及预后[J].医学信息,2018,31(21):103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.21.028]
　YAO Wen-chao,PENG Ji-hong.Application and Prognosis of Laparoscopic Electrocoagulation for Uterine Artery Removal in Patients with Uterine Fibroids without Fertility Requirements[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(18):103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.21.028]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-09-15