[1]范 婵,刘艳婷,赵 印,等.总蛋白双缩脲法单试剂盒与双试剂盒检测结果的一致性评估[J].医学信息,2018,31(20):152-154.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.20.047]
　FAN Chan,LIU Yan-ting,ZHAO Yin,et al.Consistency Evaluation of Total Protein Biuret Method Single Kit and Double Kit Test Results[J].Medical Information,2018,31(20):152-154.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.20.047]
点击复制

总蛋白双缩脲法单试剂盒与双试剂盒检测结果的一致性评估()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
31卷
期数:
2018年20期
页码:
152-154
栏目:
诊疗技术
出版日期:
2018-10-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Consistency Evaluation of Total Protein Biuret Method Single Kit and Double Kit Test Results
文章编号:
1006-1959（2018）20-0152-03
作者:
范 婵1; 刘艳婷1; 赵 印2; 肖光军1; 杨 娜1; 李祥坤1; 曹 丹1
1.遂宁市中心医院检验科，四川 遂宁 629000；2.新津县中医院检验科，四川 新津 611430
Author(s):
FAN Chan1; LIU Yan-ting1; ZHAO Yin2; XIAO Guang-jun1; YANG Na1; LI Xiang-kun1; CAO Dan1
1.Department of Laboratory Medicine,Suining Central Hospital,Suining 629000,Sichuan,China; 2.Department of Laboratory Medicine,Xinjin County Chinese Medicine Hospital,Xinjin 611430,Sichuan,China
关键词:
总蛋白; 双缩脲法; 偏倚评估; 一致性
Keywords:
Total protein; Biuret method; Bias assessment; Consistency
分类号:
R446.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.20.047
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨总蛋白双缩脲法单试剂盒与双试剂盒检测结果的一致性。方法 参照美国临床和实验室标准协会（CLSI）EP9-A2文件的要求，以双试剂盒为参比方法、单试剂盒为待评方法，使用患者新鲜血浆标本进行方法比对及偏倚评估。结果 回归方程Y=1.0064X+0.2168，相关系数r=0.9984，不同医学决定水平处的偏倚均小于我国卫生行业标准《WS/T 403-2012 临床生物化学检验常规项目分析质量指标》所规定的总允许误差的1/2。结论 总蛋白双缩脲法单试剂盒与双试剂盒的检测结果具有良好的一致性，差异临床可接受，其检测报告可使用相同的参考区间，但仍建议临床实验室使用双试剂盒检测患者样本。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the consistency of the results of the total protein biuret method single kit and double kit.Methods According to the requirements of the American Society for Clinical and Laboratory Standards(CLSI)EP9-A2 document,the double kit were used as the reference method,the single kit was used as the method to be evaluated,and the patient’s fresh plasma samples were used for method comparison and bias evaluation.Results The regression equation Y=1.0064X+0.2168,the correlation coefficient r=0.9984,the bias at different medical decision levels is less than the total specified in China’s health industry standard “WS/T 403-2012 Clinical Biochemical Inspection Conventional Project Analysis Quality Index”.Allow 1/2 of the error.Conclusion The results of single kit and double kit of total protein biuret method were in good agreement with each other,the difference was acceptable in clinic.The same reference range could be used for the test report,but it was still recommended that the clinical laboratory should use double kit to detect the patient sample.

参考文献/References:

[1]张梅,刘娜,吴妍,等.衡水市健康人群肝功能六项的参考区间调查[J].现代预防医学,2014,41(16):2950-2952. [2]陈英杰.妊娠合并肝病患者凝血指标及肝功能检测分析[J].黑龙江医学,2016,40(02):153-154. [3]郭丽丽,赵阳.总蛋白测定试剂(盒)技术审评规范要点概述[J].首都食品与医药,2016,23(06):4. [4]National Committee for Clinical Labomtory Standards.EP9-A2 method comparison and bais estimation using patient samples[S].Wayne,PA.USA:NCCLS,2002. [5]方伟祯,蔡振华,张智贤,等.日立7600和贝克曼AU5800生化分析仪测定总蛋白和白蛋白结果可比性分析[J].医学信息,2015,28(29):82-82. [6]罗映杰,林凤,刘艳婷,等.两套检测系统糖化血红蛋白检测结果的一致性分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(1):74-76. [7]中国人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.临床生物化学检验常规项目分析质量指标（WS/T 403-2012）[S].2012.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-11-09