[1]杨 杰,彭旭东,叶小斌.椎体成形术单双侧注入骨水泥治疗OVCF的效果分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(24):95-97.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.24.026]
　YANG Jie.Analysis of the Effect of Vertebroplasty with Single and Bilateral Injection of Bone Cement in the treatment of OVCF[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(24):95-97.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.24.026]
点击复制

椎体成形术单双侧注入骨水泥治疗OVCF的效果分析()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
31卷
期数:
2018年24期
页码:
95-97
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2018-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of the Effect of Vertebroplasty with Single and Bilateral Injection of Bone Cement in the treatment of OVCF
文章编号:
1006-1959（2018）24-0095-03
作者:
杨 杰; 彭旭东; 叶小斌
贵溪市人民医院骨科，江西 贵溪 335400
Author(s):
YANG Jie
Department of Orthopaedics,People's Hospital of Guixi,Guixi 335400,Jiangxi,China
关键词:
椎体成形术; 单双侧注入骨水泥; 骨水泥渗漏
Keywords:
Vertebroplasty; Single and double side injection of bone cement; Bone cement leakage
分类号:
R687.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.24.026
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨椎体成形术单双侧注入骨水泥治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的效果。方法 选取我院于2015年1月~2017年10月收治的70例骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者为研究对象，随机分为对照组和观察组，每组35例。对照组给予单侧注入骨水泥椎体成形术，观察组给予双侧注入骨水泥椎体成形术治疗。比较两组手术时间、住院时间、并发症发生率及生活质量。结果 对照组骨折患者手术时间较观察组短，住院时间较观察组长，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；对照组骨水泥渗漏，椎管狭窄、肺栓塞的发生率均高于对照组，但两组比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；对照组并发症总的发生率高于观察组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；两组患者均未失访，术前及出院后3个月生活质量评分比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；而出院后6个月、出院后1年生活质量评分比较，观察组高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者的椎体成形术治疗中，与单侧注入骨水泥相比，双侧注入骨水泥治疗可缩短其住院时间，改善其生活质量。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the offect of vertebroplasty with single and bilateral injection of bone cement in the treatment of OVCF. Methods 70 patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures admitted to our hospital from January 2015 to October 2017 were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 35 cases in each group. The control group was treated with unilateral infusion of cemented vertebroplasty, and the observation group was treated with bilateral infusion of cemented vertebroplasty. The operation time, hospitalization time, complication rate and quality of life were compared between the two groups. Results The operative time of fracture patients in the control group was shorter than that in the observation group, and the hospitalization time was significantly shorter than that in the observation group (P<0.05).The incidence of cement leakage, spinal stenosis and pulmonary embolism in the control group were higher than those in the control group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The total incidence of complications in the control group was higher than that in the observation group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no loss of follow-up in both groups. There was no significant difference in quality of life score between preoperative and post-discharge 3 months (P>0.05). 6 months after discharge,the 1-year life quality scores after discharge were higher in the observation group than in the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, bilateral bone cement injection can reduce the incidence of complications and shorten the hospital stay compared with unilateral injection of bone cement.

参考文献/References:

[1]沈永乐,王景续,宫树一,等.不同剂量骨水泥注入在单侧经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性压缩性骨折中的应用效果[J].中国医药导报,2018,15(30):71-74.
[2]刘琨,陈静,张鑫雨,等.骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折患者经皮椎体成形术后再次骨折的危险因素分析[J].现代生物医学进展,2018,18(19):3712-3715,3758.
[3]杨航,彭成忠,曾庆虎,等.单双侧穿刺椎体成形术对邻近椎体再骨折影响的比较[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究,2018,15(5):41-44.
[4]蔡玉钦.经皮椎体成形术治疗胸腰椎压缩性骨折的效果[J].中国继续医学教育,2018,10(33):90-92.
[5]赖宪良,陈鸥,苏嘉,等.双侧经皮椎体成形术中骨水泥注入量对压缩性颈椎骨折的影响[J].中国现代医学杂志,2018,28(5):68-72.
[6]邹向南,管四炎.经皮椎体成形术术中应用高/低黏度骨水泥治疗椎体压缩性骨折的疗效比较[J].脊柱外科杂志,2018,16(5):276-279.

相似文献/References:

[1]杨可佳,孙春华,洪全明,等.经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性压缩性椎体骨折的疗效观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(17):98.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.17.030]
　YANG Ke-jia,SUN Chun-hua,HONG Quan-ming,et al.Therapeutic Effect of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(24):98.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.17.030]
[2]谭兆惠.经皮椎体成形术与经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗重度骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效[J].医学信息,2019,32(24):111.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.24.038]
　TAN Zhao-hui.Efficacy of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty and Percutaneous Kyphoplasty for Severe Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(24):111.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.24.038]
[3]李卫科,诸赛玲.经皮椎体后凸成形术对老年胸腰椎骨折患者椎体功能恢复及并发症的影响[J].医学信息,2021,34(22):60.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.22.017]
　LI Wei-ke,ZHU Sai-ling.Effect of Percutaneous Kyphoplasty on Vertebral Function Recovery and Complications in Elderly Patients with Thoracolumbar Fractures[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(24):60.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.22.017]
[4]王彦金,周英杰,黄 勇.单、双侧椎弓根入路经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松型椎体压缩骨折的对比研究[J].医学信息,2023,36(08):127.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.08.027]
　WANG Yan-jin,ZHOU Ying-jie,HUANG Yong,et al.Comparative Study of Unilateral and Bilateral Pedicle Approach Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(24):127.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.08.027]

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-01-09