[1]熊红妹.PDCA护理模式应用于腹腔镜胃穿孔修补术中的临床效果观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(24):142-144.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.24.042]
　XIONG Hong-mei.Clinical Effect of PDCA Nursing Model in Laparoscopic Repair of Gastric Perforation[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(24):142-144.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.24.042]
点击复制

PDCA护理模式应用于腹腔镜胃穿孔修补术中的临床效果观察()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
31卷
期数:
2018年24期
页码:
142-144
栏目:
护理研究
出版日期:
2018-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Effect of PDCA Nursing Model in Laparoscopic Repair of Gastric Perforation
文章编号:
1006-1959（2018）24-142-03
作者:
熊红妹
南昌市新建区人民医院外科，江西 南昌 330100
Author(s):
XIONG Hong-mei
Department of Surgery,People's Hospital,Xinjian District,Nanchang 330100,Jiangxi,China
关键词:
PDCA护理模式; 胃穿孔修补术; 并发症; VAS疼痛评分
Keywords:
PDCA nursing model; Gastric perforation repair; Complications; VAS pain score
分类号:
R473.6
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.24.042
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨PDCA护理模式应用于腹腔镜胃穿孔修补术中的效果。方法 选择2015年12月~2017年12月在我院进行腹腔镜胃穿孔修补术的患者40例，分为观察组与对照组各20例。对照组采用常规护理，观察组采用PDCA护理模式进行护理，比较两组住院时间、排气时间及肠鸣音恢复时间、并发症发生情况，并采用VAS疼痛评分评价术后疼痛情况。结果 观察组护理后平均排气、肠鸣音恢复、住院时间及并发症发生率分别为（23.65±1.97）h、（22.18±2.13）h、（6.05±1.43）d、15.00%，均低于对照组的（29.71±2.28）h、（28.65±2.09）h、（8.73±1.82）d、40.00%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组术后1 d和3 d的VAS评分为（4.97±0.94）分、（3.85±0.72）分均低于对照组（6.83±1.30）分、（5.81±0.86）分，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 行腹腔镜胃穿孔修补术治疗的胃穿孔患者实施PDCA护理模式，能够有效降低痛感，减少围术期不良事件的发生，促进患者康复。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the effect of PDCA nursing mode in laparoscopic gastric perforation repair.Methods 40 patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric perforation repair from December 2015 to December 2017 in our hospital were divided into observation group (n=20) and control group (n=20).Routine nursing was used in the control group and PDCA nursing model was used in the observation group. The hospitalization time, exhaust time, recovery time of bowel sound and complications were compared between the two groups. The postoperative pain was evaluated by VAS pain score.Results In the observation group, the average exhaust, bowel sound recovery, hospitalization time and incidence of complications were (23.65±1.97) h, (22.18±2.13) h, (6.05±1.43) d,15.00%, respectively,all of them were significantly lower than those of the control group (29.71±2.28) h, (28.65 ±2.09) h, (8.73 ±1.82) d,40.00%, the difference was statistically significant(P<0 05).The VAS scores of the observation group at 1 and 3 d after operation were (4.97±0.94) and (3.85±0.72), which were lower than those in the control group (6.83±1.30) and (5.81±0.86),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion The implementation of PDCA nursing mode in patients with gastric perforation treated with laparoscopic gastric perforation can effectively reduce the pain, reduce the occurrence of perioperative adverse events, and promote the recovery of patients.

参考文献/References:

[1]陈婧,吴淑玲,徐萃锚.PDCA护理模式在腹腔镜胃穿孔修补术中的应用效果分析[J].中国医药指南,2016,14(13):229-230.
[2]王利玲.PDCA护理模式在腹腔镜胃穿孔修补术中的应用价值分析[J].中国社区医师,2016,32(17):164-165.
[3]陈杏梅,张红英.分析对比PDCA护理和常规护理对腹腔镜胃穿孔修补术中的影响效果[J].医学信息,2016,29(10):204.
[4]郭丽,廖志,张静.PDCA循环模式在护理不良及隐患缺陷事件中的应用[J].职业卫生与病伤,2016,31 (5):309-311.
[5]符红波,周燕琼,张耀峰,等.应用PDCA循环管理规范婴幼儿腹腔镜下内环口高位结扎术围手术期抗菌药物的预防使用[J].中国现代药物应用,2017,11(10):4-6.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-01-09