[1]张会方,张鹏俊,王 辰.基于因子分析的北京市某三甲医院医生对职称晋升制度的满意度研究[J].医学信息,2019,32(04):78.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.04.026]
　ZHANG Hui-fang,ZHANG Peng-jun,WANG Chen.A Study on the Satisfaction of Doctors in the Top Three Hospitals in Beijing on the Promotion System of Titles Based on Factor Analysis[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(04):78.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.04.026]
点击复制

基于因子分析的北京市某三甲医院医生对职称晋升制度的满意度研究()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
32卷
期数:
2019年04期
页码:
78
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2019-02-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Study on the Satisfaction of Doctors in the Top Three Hospitals in Beijing on the Promotion System of Titles Based on Factor Analysis
文章编号:
1006-1959（2019）04-0078-04
作者:
张会方1; 张鹏俊2; 王 辰3
（1.首都医科大学卫生管理与教育学院，北京 100069；2.北京医院/国家老年医学中心，北京 100730；3.中国医学科学院/北京协和医学院，北京 100730 ）
Author(s):
ZHANG Hui-fang1; ZHANG Peng-jun2; WANG Chen3
(1.School of Health Management and Education,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100069,China;2.Beijing Hospital/National Geriatrics Center,Beijing 100730,China;3.Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Beijing Union Medical College,Beijing 100730,China)
关键词:
医生; 职称晋升制度; 影响因素; 因子分析; 科研指标
Keywords:
doctor; title promotion; satisfaction;  influence factor;  factor analysis
分类号:
R197.32
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.04.026
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 通过了解某三甲医院医生对职称晋升制度的满意度情况，分析影响其满意度的主要因素，为进一步提出完善我国医院职称制度的合理建议提供理论参考依据。方法 采用问卷调查法，于2018年8~9月对北京市某三甲医院在职医生进行调查，通过因子分析将问卷中各条目按照相关性进行降维，通过多元线性回归分析，剖析其中医生对影响职称晋升制度满意度的显著因素。共计回收有效问卷103份，回收率99.03%。结果 科研指标、临床指标、评审程序、职级划分和教育指标5个公因子与职称晋升制度满意度有关（P＜0.05）；大学本科及以下学历对职级划分满意度得分最低，其满意度得分为（2.50±1.14）分；没有教学系列职称的医生对科研指标、教育指标满意度得分最低，其满意度得分分别为（0.72±0.24）分、（0.53±0.10）分。结论 科研指标成为影响医生对职称晋升制度满意度的首要因素，政府及相关人事部门应合理调整晋升标准中指标权重，设置具有专属晋升标准的独立职业路径，以临床能力为临床系列医生晋升的主要衡量标准。
Abstract:
Objective To understand the satisfaction of doctors in a top three hospitals on the promotion system of professional titles, and to analyze the main factors affecting their satisfaction, and to provide a theoretical reference for further suggesting reasonable suggestions for improving the hospital title system in China. Methods Questionnaire survey was used to investigate the in-service doctors in a top three hospital in Beijing from August to September 2018. Through factor analysis, the items in the questionnaire were reduced in accordance with the correlation, and the influence of doctors was analyzed through multiple linear regression analysis. A significant factor in the satisfaction of the title promotion system. A total of 103 valid questionnaires were recovered, with a recovery rate of 99.03%. Results The five public factors of scientific research indicators, clinical indicators, evaluation procedures, ranks and educational indicators were related to the satisfaction of the promotion system (P<0.05). The undergraduate and below qualifications had the lowest satisfaction scores for the ranks, and the satisfaction score was (2.50±1.14) points; doctors who did not have the title of teaching series had the lowest satisfaction scores for scientific research indicators and educational indicators, and their satisfaction scores were (0.72±0.24) points and (0.53±0.10) points respectively. Conclusion The scientific research index becomes the primary factor that affects the doctor's satisfaction with the professional title promotion system. The government and the related personnel departments should adjust the index weight of the promotion standard reasonably and set up the independent career path with the exclusive promotion standard. Clinical ability is the main measure of the promotion of clinical doctors.

参考文献/References:


[1]沈群红,曹英男,张宇成,等.中国医生职称制度存在的问题及其改革设计[J].医学与社会,2015,28(11):43-51.
[2]吴华.浅谈职称晋升工作在医院人才管理中的作用[J].当代临床医刊,2012,25(2):96-97.
[3]杨柳,余邦良,张清荣,等.海南省医护人员职称晋升制度满意度调查[J].海南医学,2015(15):2321-2323.
[4]Liu YF,Yang ZP,Fan DM.Professional title promotion among clinicians:a cross-sectional survey[J].The Lancet,2016.388(s1):s31.
[5]蒋晶晶,李建英,周斌.卫生专业技术人员对职称论文态度的调查分析[J].中国医院,2016,11(20):35-37.
[6]梅浙川.临床和科研业绩在医生职称晋升中的权重[J].中国医院,2014,3(18):51.
[7]周开宇,高晓琳,万朝,等.临床医生与临床科研-相辅相成、相促相长[J].医药前沿,2016,6(31):355-357.
[8]董秀玥.淡化临床医生晋升的论文要求[J].中国卫生人才,2015(8):92-93.
[9]宁光.不做科研，新知识从何而来？[N].医师报,2017-8-10.
[10]王秀勇.高校辅导员职业生涯规划定位与职业能力提升研究[J].华侨大学学报,2016(3):126-131.
[11]中华人民共和国人事部、卫生部.临床医学专业中、高级技术资格评审条件(试行)[Z].1999-8-18.
[12]杨凤翔,陈蕾,罗秀玲,等.临床护理岗位层级晋升考核方案[J].解放军医院管理杂志,2017,24(12):1181-1184.
[13]黄菊,代涛.三级甲等公立医院院长对医院改革认知的调查[J].中国医院管理,2016,36(2):1-3.
[14]范大力.美国医生的晋级之路.医学界,2016-03-16.[EB/OL]:http://www.medsci.cn/article/show_article.doid=528044e43ae
[15]程之红,蒋平,任飞.医院对外合作平台构建在人才培育中的研究与分析[J].中国医院管理,2011,10(2):60-61.
[16]北京市人社局.卫生系列高级职称及中级职称评审政策[Z]. 2002-10-1.
[17]郑延松,范利,王鲁宁.对高学历低年资临床医师培训的探索[J].中华医院管理,2008,24(11):758-760.
[18]罗小楠,徐勇勇,刘鉴汶.主治医师晋升副主任医师的临床能力评估指标的研究[J].中国卫生事业管理,2014,20(60):379-381.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-03-07