[1]宋国涛.早期联合治疗对陈旧性股骨干骨折手术效果的影响研究[J].医学信息,2019,(04):110-112.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.04.035]
 SONG Guo-tao.Effect of Early Combined Therapy on the Surgical Outcome of Old Femoral Shaft Fractures[J].Medical Information,2019,(04):110-112.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.04.035]
点击复制

早期联合治疗对陈旧性股骨干骨折手术效果的影响研究()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
期数:
2019年04期
页码:
110-112
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2019-02-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Early Combined Therapy on the Surgical Outcome of Old Femoral Shaft Fractures
文章编号:
1006-1959(2019)04-0110-03
作者:
宋国涛
(佳木斯市中心医院骨外二科,黑龙江 佳木斯 154002)
Author(s):
SONG Guo-tao
(Department of Orthopaedics,Subject Two,Jiamusi Central Hospital,Jiamusi 154002,Heilongjiang,China)
关键词:
陈旧性股骨干骨折骨折愈合时间术中出血量
Keywords:
Old femoral shaft fractureFracture healing timeIntraoperative blood loss
分类号:
R687.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.04.035
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 分析早期联合治疗对陈旧性股骨干骨折手术治疗效果的影响。方法 选择我院2017年4月~2018年4月收治陈旧性股骨干骨折患者74例,随机分为对照组和观察组,各37例。对照组采用单一手术治疗,观察组在对照组基础上加用早期膝关节活动训练。比较两组患者的临床疗效和术中出血量、骨折愈合时间以及住院时长。结果 对照组的总有效率为75.68%,低于观察组的94.59%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术中出血量(80.37±4.62)ml、骨折愈合时间(152.67±10.71)d和住院时长(12.49±4.27)d均优于对照组术中出血量(230.68±9.01)ml、骨折愈合时间(198.73±12.49)d和住院时长(19.58±4.92)d,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 对陈旧性股骨干骨折患者采用早期联合治疗效果明显,有助于减少患者术中出血量、骨折愈合时间以及住院时长,应用效果较好。
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the effect of early combined therapy on the surgical treatment of old femoral shaft fractures. Methods 74 patients with old femoral shaft fractures from April 2017 to April 2018 were randomly divided into control group and observation group, 37 cases each. The control group was treated with a single operation, and the observation group was given an early knee joint activity training based on the control group. The clinical efficacy and intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of the control group was 75.68%, which was lower than that of the observation group 94.59%,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The intraoperative blood loss (80.37±4.62) ml and fracture healing time (152.67±10.71) in the observation group. d and length of hospitalization (12.49±4.27) d were better than the control group (230.68±9.01) ml, fracture healing time (198.73±12.49) d and hospitalization time (19.58±4.92) d,the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The early combination therapy for patients with old femoral shaft fractures is effective, which can help reduce the amount of intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time and hospitalization time.

参考文献/References:


[1]杨延涛.手术疗法与非手术疗法治疗股骨干骨折疗效比较[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2015(22):2465-2467.
[2]黄尊贤,林达生,余爱玉,等.两种翻修方法治疗股骨干骨折术后内固定失效的疗效比较[J].临床骨科杂志,2016,19(3):340-343.
[3]丁路,韩小平,吕青,等.股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨颈骨折的手术治疗[J].中国医药导刊,2016,18(9):875-876.
[4]刘杰,廖中亚,胡伟,等.小切口切开复位交锁髓内钉固定治疗难复性 B 型股骨干骨折效果分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2013,28(12):1216-1217.
[5]王荣诗,周欣,曾玉林.股骨干骨折内固定术后并发急性感染的外科治疗[J].临床骨科杂志,2015,18(1):52.
[6]侯继光,张楠,罗仕,等.早期联合治疗对陈旧性股骨干骨折手术治疗效果的影响[J].河北医学,2017,23(10):1649-1652.
[7]陈奇.锁定钢板结合骨板和髓内钉治疗股骨干陈旧性骨折的临床疗效对比[D].福建医科大学,2016.
[8]许金松.带锁髓内针并髂骨取骨植骨治疗陈旧性股骨干骨折疗效分析[J].航空航天医学杂志,2017,28(5):574-576.
[9]卢敏,陈建文,王勇.带锁髓内针并髂骨取骨植骨治疗陈旧性股骨干骨折的临床疗效观察[J].中医临床研究,2018,10(10):125-126.
[10]汪健.探讨股骨近端并股骨干骨折手术治疗的方法及临床效果[J].中国卫生标准管理,2017,8(15):43-44.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-03-07