[1]李燕雄,冯子豪,陈文忠.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠病灶切除术与子宫动脉栓塞术后 清宫的效果比较[J].医学信息,2019,(17):92-94.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.17.028]
 LI Yan-xiong,FENG Zi-hao,CHEN Wen-zhong.Comparison of the Effect of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Resection and Uterine Artery Embolization[J].Medical Information,2019,(17):92-94.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.17.028]
点击复制

剖宫产瘢痕妊娠病灶切除术与子宫动脉栓塞术后 清宫的效果比较()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
期数:
2019年17期
页码:
92-94
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2019-09-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the Effect of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Resection and Uterine Artery Embolization
文章编号:
1006-1959(2019)17-0092-03
作者:
李燕雄1冯子豪1陈文忠2
昆明市第一人民医院妇科1,介入室2,云南 昆明 650000
Author(s):
LI Yan-xiong1FENG Zi-hao1CHEN Wen-zhong2
Department of Gynecology1,Department of Intervention2,Kunming First People's Hospital, Kunming 650000,Yunnan,China
关键词:
剖宫产瘢痕妊娠瘢痕病灶切除术子宫动脉栓塞
Keywords:
Key words:Cesarean scar pregnancyScar lesion resectionUterine artery embolization
分类号:
R713.8
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.17.028
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较剖宫产瘢痕妊娠病(CSP)灶切除与子宫动脉栓塞后清宫的临床效果。方法 回顾性分析2015年1月~2018年6月我院收治的110例剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者的临床资料,根据手术方式分为手术组(52例)和清宫组(58例),手术组行瘢痕病灶切除术,清宫组同期行子宫动脉栓塞后清宫,比较两组术中出血量、血HCG下降至正常的时间、住院费用及术后第1次月经量改变情况。结果 手术组平均出血量为(80.59±17.12)ml,高于清宫组的(8.65±1.53)ml,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);手术组血HCG下降至正常时间为(22.40±7.45)d,少于清宫组的(31.80±8.24)d,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组住院费用比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);清宫组有9例出现术后第1次月经量减少,手术组无患者发生月经量改变。结论 瘢痕妊娠病灶切除与子宫动脉栓塞后清宫的住院费用相当,但子宫动脉栓塞后清宫有瘢痕持续存在、术后血HCG下降缓慢、部分患者出现月经量减少的缺点,故对于肌壁厚度<4 mm,有再生育要求的CSP患者,瘢痕病灶切除术应作为首选的治疗措施。
Abstract:
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical effects of cesarean scar pregnancy resection and uterine artery embolization.Methods The clinical data of 110 patients with cesarean scar pregnancy admitted to our hospital from January 2015 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical procedure, they were divided into operation group (52 cases) and Qinggong group (58 cases). The scar was resected, and the uterine artery embolization was performed in the Qinggong group. The intraoperative blood loss, blood HCG decreased to normal time, hospitalization cost and the change of menstrual volume after operation was compared.Results The mean bleeding volume in the operation group was (80.59±17.12) ml, which was higher than that in the Qinggong group (8.65±1.53) ml,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The blood HCG in the operation group decreased to the normal time (22.40±7.45) d, less than the Qinggong group (31.80 ± 8.24) d, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); the difference between the two groups of hospitalization costs, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05);9 cases of the Qinggong group after the operation the first menstrual flow was reduced, and no changes in menstrual flow occurred in the surgery group.Conclusion The cost of hospitalization for sacral pregnancy resection and uterine artery embolization is equivalent to that of uterine artery embolization. However, there is a scar in the uterus after embolization of the uterus, and the blood HCG declines slowly after operation. Some patients have the disadvantage of reducing menstrual flow, so the thickness of the muscle wall is less than 4 mm, CSP patients with re-fertility requirements, scar lesion resection should be the preferred treatment.

参考文献/References:

[1]Timor-Tritsch IE,Monteagudo A.Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries:early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy.A review[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2012,207(1):14-29. [2]Gonzalez N,Tulandi T.Cesarean Scar Pregnancy:A Systematic Review[J].J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2017,24(5):731-738. [3]Takahashi H,Matsubara S.Intrauterine hypoechoic mass cephalad to cesarean scar pregnancy[J].Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2015,94(6):670-671. [4]叶天和,潘峰,周国锋,等.预防性子宫动脉化疗栓塞术序贯超声导引下清宫术治疗瘢痕妊娠的临床观察[J].介入放射学杂志,2018,27(2):128-132. [5]王素华.剖宫产切口瘢痕妊娠患者采用宫腔镜及子宫动脉栓塞术联合治疗的效果及安全性分析[J].中国内镜杂志,2016,22(9):84-87. [6]李娜.宫腔镜联合子宫动脉栓塞术对剖宫产术后瘢痕异位妊娠的治疗效果及安全性分析[J].河北医学,2018(8):1332-1336. [7]Zeng Z,Ding SP,Zeng X,et al.The value of transvaginal ultrasound in clinical surgical treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy[J].J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci,2017,37(4):536-540. [8]周勤,谭丽峰,李丽,等.子宫动脉化疗栓塞术联合B超引导下清宫术治疗32例剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床疗效评价[J].河南医学研究,2016,25(9):1562-1565. [9]Mclucas B,Voorhees WD,Snyder SA.Anti-Mllerian hormone levels before and after uterine artery embolization[J].Müinim Invasive Ther Allied Technol,2018,27(3):186-190. [10]李恩苗.B超引导下清宫术联合子宫动脉栓塞术治疗剖宫产后瘢痕妊娠临床效果分析[J].中外医疗,2019,38(1):173-175. [11]姚群,范颖.曼月乐与热球子宫内膜去除术治疗异常子宫出血的效果及对性激素水平、生活质量的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2018,33(14):3324-3328. [12]Lu JY,Gu JP,Xu WJ,et al.Clinical application and prognostic analysis of interventional treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy[J].Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences),2016,48(6):1012-1018. [13]Birch Petersen K,Hoffmann E,Rifbjerg Larsen C,et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy:a systematic review of treatment studies[J].Fertil Steril,2016,105(4):958-967.

相似文献/References:

[1]杨凯悦,单 莉,何菊仙.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠治疗方式的选择[J].医学信息,2019,(02):48.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.02.016]
 YANG Kai-yue,SAHN Li,HE Ju-xian.Selection of treatment methods for cesarean scar pregnancy[J].Medical Information,2019,(17):48.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.02.016]
[2]杨树环,王志毅,蔡 钰.举宫杯在腹腔镜下剖宫产瘢痕妊娠病灶清除术中的临床应用[J].医学信息,2019,(17):72.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.17.022]
 YANG Shu-huan,WANG Zhi-yi,CAI Yu.Clinical Application of Uterine Cup in Laparoscopic Caesarean Scar Pregnancy Removal[J].Medical Information,2019,(17):72.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.17.022]

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-09-01