[1]邹 宏.处方点评对中药调配差错的影响[J].医学信息,2019,32(18):129-131.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.18.043]
 ZOU Hong.The Effect of Prescription Comments on the Mismatch of Traditional Chinese Medicine[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(18):129-131.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.18.043]
点击复制

处方点评对中药调配差错的影响()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
32卷
期数:
2019年18期
页码:
129-131
栏目:
调查分析
出版日期:
2019-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Effect of Prescription Comments on the Mismatch of Traditional Chinese Medicine
文章编号:
1006-1959(2019)18-0129-03
作者:
邹 宏
江西省宜丰县人民医院药剂科,江西 宜丰 336300
Author(s):
ZOU Hong
Department of Pharmacy,People's Hospital of Yifeng County,Yifeng 336300,Jiangxi,China
关键词:
处方点评中药调配差错对策影响分析
Keywords:
Key words:Prescription reviewChinese medicine allocation errorCountermeasureImpact analysis
分类号:
R288
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.18.043
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨处方点评对中药调配差错的影响。方法 选取2017年4月~2018年3月我院门诊开具的69张中药处方未进行处方点评作为对比组,另选取2018年4月~2019年3月我院门诊开具的78张中药处方已实施处方点评作为研究组,比较两组中草药处方、中药针剂处方、中成药处方调配差错发生率,及中药调配差错原因。结果 两组中草药处方、中药针剂处方调配差错发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组中成药处方调配差错发生率为0.57%,低于对比组的5.80%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组处方中药调配差错总发生率为2.56,低于对比组的8.70%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组处方剂量差错、发药差错、错配、多配以及少配中药调配差错发生率均低于对比组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 实施中药处方点评能够及时发现中药调配常见问题,降低处方调配差错发生率,保证用药的科学性和安全性。
Abstract:
Abstract:Objective To explore the effect of prescription comments on the mismatch of traditional Chinese medicines.Methods From April 2017 to March 2018, 69 Chinese medicine prescriptions issued by our hospital were not submitted as prescriptions, and 78 prescriptions of Chinese medicines issued by our hospital from April 2018 to March 2019 were implemented. As a research group, the prescription review compares the incidence of Chinese herbal medicine prescriptions, Chinese medicine injection prescriptions, Chinese medicine prescriptions, and the reasons for the errors in Chinese medicine dispensing.Results There was no significant difference in the incidence of Chinese herbal medicine prescriptions and Chinese medicine injection prescriptions (P>0.05). The incidence of prescription dispensing errors in the study group was 0.57%, which was lower than the 5.80% of the comparison group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); the total incidence of prescription Chinese medicine dispensing errors in the study group was 2.56, which was lower than the 8.70% in the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of prescription dose error, drug error, mismatch, multi-match and less allocation of Chinese medicine were lower in the study group than in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).Conclusion The implementation of traditional Chinese medicine prescription reviews can promptly find common problems in Chinese medicine dispensing, reduce the incidence of prescription dispensing errors, and ensure the scientific and safety of medication.

参考文献/References:

[1]黄伟,韩洁,张碧华.北京医院2015-2016年门诊中药饮片处方点评与分析[J].临床药物治疗杂志,2017,15(7):44-48. [2]李晓辉,张丽娜,高娜.中药处方点评在中药调剂中的应用[J].中外女性健康研究,2017(3):34-35. [3]任晓莉.中药处方调配常见问题及防范措施[J].航空航天医学杂志,2013,24(6):740-741. [4]林小娟,钱静芬.门诊中药房饮片调配的常见差错及中药处方点评干预效果观察[J].中国药物经济学,2018,13(4):15-17. [5]钟仲,麦蕴华.基层医院中药处方分析及其在处方调配中的应用[J].中医临床研究,2018,10(12):137-139. [6]邵飞.处方点评对中药调配差错及其对策的影响研究[J].中国处方药,2017,15(11):29-30. [7]祝未名.中药调配中影响临床疗效的因素调查与分析[J].中医药管理杂志,2016(12):60-61. [8]张丹阳.我院门诊中药房饮片调配的常见差错及中药处方点评干预效果分析[J].医学理论与实践,2016,29(22):3157-3159. [9]江梅兰.实施处方点评制度对中药饮片调配差错的影响[J].中外医学研究,2018,16(6):178-179. [10]吴蔚苗,梁智,欧阳燕婷,黄华德.我院2015~2016年门诊中药饮片处方点评与分析[J].海峡药学,2017,29(7):244-246. [11]万瑾,季敏,胡茵,王飞.73588张门诊中药饮片处方点评与分析[J].中国医院用药评价与分析,2018,18(1):122-124. [12]霍铭.分析中药饮片处方的规范性及其用药合理性[J].中国处方药,2017,15(5):42-43.

相似文献/References:

[1]张艳娟,李纪伟.门急诊处方点评与分析[J].医学信息,2019,32(13):123.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.13.036]
 ZHANG Yan-juan,LI Ji-wei.Door Emergency Prescription Review and Analysis[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(18):123.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.13.036]

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-09-15