[1]李前进,马惠斌,拜合提亚·阿扎提,等.超声造影与增强CT对小肾癌诊断价值及不同病理类型超声造影表现的研究[J].医学信息,2019,32(10):163-165.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.054]
 LI Qian-jin,MA Hui-bin,Baihe Azati,et al.The Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography and Contrast-enhanced CT inthe Diagnosis of Small Renal Cell Carcinoma and the Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(10):163-165.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.054]
点击复制

超声造影与增强CT对小肾癌诊断价值及不同病理类型超声造影表现的研究()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
32卷
期数:
2019年10期
页码:
163-165
栏目:
诊疗技术
出版日期:
2019-05-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography and Contrast-enhanced CT inthe Diagnosis of Small Renal Cell Carcinoma and the Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography
文章编号:
1006-1959(2019)10-0163-03
作者:
李前进马惠斌拜合提亚·阿扎提木拉提·热夏提
(新疆医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830054)
Author(s):
LI Qian-jinMA Hui-binBaihe AzatiMulati Hothati
(Department of Urology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830054,Xinjiang,China)
关键词:
小肾癌超声造影增强CT
Keywords:
Small renal cell carcinomaContrast-enhanced ultrasoundEnhanced CT
分类号:
R73
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.054
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
目的 通过对比超声造影与增强CT在小肾癌中的诊断准确率及不同病理类型超声造影的表现,探讨超声对小肾癌及不同病理类型的诊断价值,提高小肾癌的诊断水平。方法 回顾性分析2010年6月~2017年12月我院收治的60例直径小于4 cm肾占位性病变患者的超声造影和增强CT检查资料,并根据病理检查结果进行对比研究,比较两种检查方法对小肾癌的诊断准确率、灵敏度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值,同时对比不同病理类型的小肾癌在超声造影下的灌注特点。结果 超声造影诊断准确率为96.67%,高于增强CT的95.00%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。肾透明细胞癌主要以快进快退为主(42.86%),其次为快进慢退(36.73%)、等进等退(8.16%)和其他(8.16%)、慢进慢退(4.08%);乳头状肾细胞癌主要以慢进慢退(57.14%),其次为快进快退为主(42.86%);嫌色细胞癌均为快进快退(100.00%);错构瘤为慢进慢退(100.00%);嗜酸性粒细胞瘤为快进慢退(100.00%)。结论 肾癌的病理类型以透明细胞癌为主,透明细胞癌的超声造影表现主要以快进快退为主,乳头状肾细胞癌以慢进慢退为主,嫌色细胞癌以快进快退为主。通过超声造影提示基本可以评估小肾癌的病理类型,超声造影、增强CT对小肾癌的诊断都具有较高的价值,但增强CT可以为小肾癌精确定位诊断提供重要参考。若两者联合使用,有助于提高诊断准确率,为临床的诊断及临床手术方案的拟定提供更大的帮助。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and enhanced CT in small renal cell carcinoma and the contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings of different pathological types, to explore the diagnostic value of ultrasound for small renal cell carcinoma and different pathological types, and to improve the diagnosis of small renal cell carcinoma.Methods A retrospective analysis of 60 patients with renal occlusion lesions less than 4 cm in diameter from June 2010 to December 2017 was performed. The results of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced CT examination were compared. The diagnostic method was used to diagnose the accuracy, sensitivity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of small renal cell carcinoma, and to compare the perfusion characteristics of small renal cell carcinoma with different pathological types under contrast-enhanced ultrasound.Results The diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound was 96.67%, which was higher than that of enhanced CT 95.00%,the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Renal clear cell carcinoma is mainly fast-forward and fast-recession (42.86%), followed by fast-forward and slow-recession (36.73%), equal-in and backward (8.16%) and other (8.16%), slow-in and slow-off (4.08%); papillary renal cell carcinoma mainly slowed down slowly (57.14%), followed by fast-forward and rapid retreat (42.86%); chromophobe cell carcinoma was fast-forward and retreat (100.00%); Slow progression and slow retreat (100.00%); eosinophilic tumor is fast-forward and slow-back (100.00%).Conclusion The pathological type of renal cell carcinoma is mainly clear cell carcinoma. The contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of clear cell carcinoma is mainly fast-forward and fast-return. Papillary renal cell carcinoma is mainly slow-moving and slow-returning. Retreat to the main. Ultrasound angiography can basically evaluate the pathological type of small renal cell carcinoma. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and enhanced CT have high value in the diagnosis of small renal cell carcinoma. However, enhanced CT can provide an important reference for accurate localization diagnosis of small renal cell carcinoma. If the two are used together, it will help to improve the diagnostic accuracy and provide greater help for clinical diagnosis and clinical surgical planning.

参考文献/References:

[1]李冬霞,齐学勤,李晓义,等.无症状型小肾癌应用彩色多普勒超声诊断的临床价值[J].河北医药,2015,37(13):2004-2006.
[2]谢梦雨,伍兵.CT灌注成像技术在肾脏肿瘤中的应用[J].影像诊断与介入放射学,2014,23(5):435-438.
[3]Chen L,Wang L,Diao X,et al.The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differentiating small renal carcinoma and angiomyolipoma[J].Biosci Trends,2015,9(4):252-258.
[4]刘周强,李俊平,陈朝晖,等.肾脏小肿瘤术前影像学研究[J].中华实验外科杂志,2014,31(3):652-653.
[5]Sun D,Wei C,Li Y,et al.Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with quantitative analysis allows differentiation of renal tumor histotypes[J].Sci Rep,2016(6):35081.
[6]曾红春,王颖鑫,杨文艳,等.超声造影及增强CT鉴别诊断肾脏小肿瘤良恶性的比较研究[J].新疆医科大学学报,2018,41(9):1092-1094,1098.
[7]万明军,叶波,马守军,等.螺旋CT增强扫描在肾癌鉴别诊断中的价值[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2017,15(2):63-65.
[8]Barr R G,Peterson C,Hindi A.Evaluation of Indeterminate Renal Masses with Contrast-enhanced US: A Diagnostic Performance Study[J].Radiology,2014,271(1):133-142.

相似文献/References:

[1]盛海龙,方长太,查佳安.超声造影对重症急性胰腺炎并发早期急性肾损的诊断价值[J].医学信息,2022,35(09):171.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.09.044]
 SHENG Hai-long,FANG Chang-tai,ZHA Jia-an.Diagnostic Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography in Severe Acute Pancreatitis Complicated with Early Acute Kidney Injury[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(10):171.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.09.044]
[2]杜鑫荣.超声造影在肝实质性肿块诊断及鉴别中的临床价值[J].医学信息,2019,32(19):176.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.19.059]
 DU Xin-rong.Clinical Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Liver Mass[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(10):176.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.19.059]
[3]董 建,褚志强,童 瑾.超声造影在经皮肝穿射频消融治疗小肝癌中的应用价值[J].医学信息,2020,33(15):174.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.15.056]
 DONG Jian,CHU Zhi-qiang,TONG Jin.Application Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in PercutaneousRadiofrequency Ablation for Small Liver Cancer[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(10):174.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.15.056]
[4]杜 慧,刘 昕.常规超声联合超声造影对非特殊型浸润性乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的预测价值[J].医学信息,2024,37(01):120.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.01.020]
 DU Hui,LIU Xin.Predictive Value of Conventional Ultrasound Combined with Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis for Invasive Breast Carcinoma of No Specific Type[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(10):120.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.01.020]

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-05-15