[1]梁元卿,朱婷燕,郑玉婷,等.电子信息化下的SBAR沟通模式在危重患儿交班中的应用[J].医学信息,2019,32(20):26-29.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.20.008]
　LIANG Yuan-qing,ZHU Ting-yan,ZHENG Yu-ting,et al.Application of SBAR Communication Mode under Electronic Informationization in the Handover of Critically Ill Children[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(20):26-29.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.20.008]
点击复制

电子信息化下的SBAR沟通模式在危重患儿交班中的应用()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
32卷
期数:
2019年20期
页码:
26-29
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-10-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of SBAR Communication Mode under Electronic Informationization in the Handover of Critically Ill Children
文章编号:
1006-1959（2019）20-0026-04
作者:
梁元卿; 朱婷燕; 郑玉婷; 钏 新
（昆明市儿童医院护理部，云南 昆明 650000）
Author(s):
LIANG Yuan-qing; ZHU Ting-yan; ZHENG Yu-ting; CHUAN Xin
(Department of Nursing,Kunming Children's Hospital,Kunming 650000,Yunnan,China)
关键词:
电子信息化; SBAR沟通模式; 危重患儿; 医护合作
Keywords:
Electronic informationization; SBAR communication mode; Critically ill children;  Medical cooperation
分类号:
R473
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.20.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨电子信息化下的SBAR沟通模式在危重患儿交班中的应用效果。方法 选取昆明市儿童医院PICU2018年4月1日~30日收治的148例患儿为对照组，采用常规交班模式；2018年7月1日~31日收治的154例患儿为实验组，采用电子化SBAR交班模式。比较两组交接班内容错漏情况、交接班时间、护士对危重患儿病情掌握程度及医护合作情况。结果 实验组医护人员在交接班中发生错交、漏交的次数低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；实验组书写交班时间、床旁交班时间均低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；实验组护士对患儿基本信息、病情诊断/病情变化、过敏史/特殊用药情况、主要异常检查/检验结果及风险评估掌握评分分别为（8.72±0.10）分、（9.37±0.09）分、（9.49±0.84）分、（9.56±0.83）分、（9.70±0.71）分，均高于对照组的（6.51±0.11）分、（6.70±0.12）分、（6.88±0.13）分、（6.81±0.13）分、（6.70±0.12）分，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；实验组患儿信息交流、共同参与治疗或护理的决策及护士、医生的关系及医护合作状况总分均高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 将SBAR理论应用于危重患儿的交接班中可有效改善交接班内容错漏，节省交接班时间，提高护士对患儿病情的掌握程度，增进医护合作。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the application effect of SBAR communication mode under electronic informationization in the handover of critically ill children. Methods The 148 children admitted to the Children's Hospital of Kunming from April 1st to 30th, 2018, were selected as the control group, and the routine delivery mode was adopted. The 154 children admitted from July 1st to 31st, 2018 were experimental groups, using electronic SBAR shift mode. Compare the content of the two groups of handovers, the time of handover, the nurse's mastery of critical illness and the status of medical cooperation. Results The number of misunderstandings and missed crossings in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The writing time and bedtime of the experimental group were lower than the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); the experimental group's basic information, disease diagnosis/condition change, allergy history/special drug use, main abnormality test/test result and risk assessment master score were (8.72±0.10 ), (9.37±0.09), (9.49±0.84), (9.56±0.83), and (9.70±0.71), respectively, which were higher than the control group (6.51±0.11) and (6.70±0.12),(6.88±0.13), (6.81±0.13), (6.70±0.12), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); the experimental group patients exchange information, participate in treatment or nursing decision-making and nurses, doctors the relationship between the relationship and the status of medical cooperation was higher than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Applying SBAR theory to the handover class of critically ill children can effectively improve the content of the handover class, save the handover time, improve the nurse's mastery of the child's condition, and enhance the medical cooperation.

参考文献/References:

[1]美国医疗机构评审国际联合委员会（美）.医院评审标准[M].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2017:36-37. [2]李建萍,钱火红.SBAR 沟通模式在护理工作中的应用现状[J].解放军护理杂志,2016,33(15):36-38,41. [3]黄培,易利华.基于JCI的医疗质量持续改进实践与思考[J].中国卫生质量管理,2016,23(4):前插1,1-3. [4]Leonard M,Graham S,Bonacum D.The human factor:the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care[J].Qual Saf Health Care,2004,13(Suppl 1):85-90. [5]岳雪艳,赵妮娜,唐云.标准化沟通方式在儿科医护间沟通中的应用[J].医学信息,2015,28(42):255. [6]Whittinghanq KA,Oldroyd LE.Using all SBAR-keeping it real! Demonstrating how improving safe cal'e delivery has been incorporated into a top-up degree programme[J].Nurse Educ Today,2014,34(6):e47-e52． [7]Ushiro R.Nurse-Physician Collaboratjon Scale：development and psychometric tesling[J].J Adv Nurs,2009,65(7):1497-1508. [8]王晓洁,高红梅.SBAR标准沟通模式在我国护理工作中应用效果的Meta分析[J].护理研究,2018,32(13):2040-2047. [9]王庆忠,何苗,柯艳,等.数字化医院检验信息系统(LIS)设计与应用[J].实验室研究与探索,2013,32(7):104-106. [10]医政医管局.2014病历书写基本规范详解[M].北京:科学出版社,2014:39-40. [11]丁枭伟,蔡燕,高黎,等.北京朝阳医院PACS建设项目管理的体会[J].中国数字医学,2011,6(10):80-83. [12]陈金雄.电子病历与电子病历系统[J].医疗卫生装备,2010,31(10):1-7. [13]张桂华,罗平,陈潇君.信息共享在简化护理交班系统中的应用[J].中华护理杂志,2011,46(12):1207-1208. [14]谷铮铮,张琳,严红,等.口腔专科医院医护合作行为现状的研究[J].中华现代护理杂志,2016,22(23):3326-3329.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-10-15