[1]张 莹,马素荣,朱琳虹,等.iRoot SP糊剂用于根管再治疗的疗效[J].医学信息,2019,32(21):106-107.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.21.033]
　ZHANG Ying,MA Su-rong,ZHU Lin-hong,et al.Effect of iRoot SP Paste for Root Canal Retreatment[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(21):106-107.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.21.033]
点击复制

iRoot SP糊剂用于根管再治疗的疗效()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
32卷
期数:
2019年21期
页码:
106-107
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2019-11-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of iRoot SP Paste for Root Canal Retreatment
文章编号:
1006-1959（2019）21-0106-02
作者:
张 莹; 马素荣; 朱琳虹; 冯 佳; 姜 靓
（宁夏医科大学总医院口腔医院特诊科，宁夏 银川 750004）
Author(s):
ZHANG Ying; MA Su-rong; ZHU Lin-hong; FENG Jia; JIANG Liang
(Department of Stomatology,General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University,Yinchuan 750004,Ningxia,China)
关键词:
iRoot SP; AH-Plus; 根管再治疗; 术后疼痛
Keywords:
iRoot SP; AH-Plus; Root canal retreatment; Postoperative pain
分类号:
R781.05
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.21.033
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨iRoot SP糊剂用于根管再治疗的疗效。方法 选取2016年5月~2017年12月我院接受非手术性根管再治疗患者158例（患牙174颗），采用随机数字表法分为A组和B组，每组87例。A组使用iRoot SP糊剂，B组使用AH-Plus糊剂，两组患牙放置根管充填糊剂后，均采用热牙胶连续波垂直加压法充填根管，比较两组治疗48 h、10 d后疼痛反应以及6个月、1年临床疗效。结果 治疗后48 h，A组疼痛率低于B组（8.05% vs 24.14%），差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；治疗后10 d，两组疼痛率比较（5.75% vs 11.49%），差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。治疗后6个月、1年，A组成功率均高于B组，但差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 iRoot SP糊剂用于根管再治疗可减轻根管再治疗患牙充填后的急性疼痛，并且远期疗效稳定。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the efficacy of iRoot SP paste for root canal retreatment. Methods From May 2016 to December 2017, 158 patients (174 teeth) were treated with non-surgical root canal therapy. The patients were divided into group A and group B by random number table, 87 cases in each group. Group A used iRoot SP paste, group B used AH-Plus paste, two groups of teeth placed root canal filling paste, were filled with hot tooth gel continuous wave vertical compression method, compared with two groups for 48 h treatment the pain response after 10 d and the clinical efficacy of 6 months and 1 year. Results At 48 h after treatment, the pain rate in group A was lower than that in group B (8.05% vs 24.14%), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The pain rate was compared between the two groups (5.75% vs 11.49%) at 10 d after treatment,the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). At 6 months and 1 year after treatment, the power of A was higher than that of group B, but the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05). Conclusion iRoot SP paste for root canal retreatment can reduce the acute pain after root canal retreatment for tooth filling, and the long-term effect is stable.

参考文献/References:

[1]Er K,Ayar A,Kalkan OF,et al.Neurotoxicity evaluation of three root canal sealers on cultured rat trigeminal ganglion neurons[J].J Clin Exp Dent,2017,9(1):e34-e39. [2]Chang SW,Lee SY,Kang SK,et al.In vitro biocompatibility,inflammatory response,and osteogenic potential of 4 root canal sealers:Sealapex,Sankin apatite root sealer,MTA Fillapex,and iRoot SP root canal sealer[J].J Endod,2014,40(10):1642-1648. [3]洪硕.iRootSP 用于根管充填的临床疗效观察[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2014,30(1):37-39. [4]颜雯,吴友农.iRootSP 糊剂用于根管充填的临床疗效评价[J].口腔医学,2016,36(6):532-535. [5]李薇,吕翔.四种不同根管封闭剂用于根管充填后的临床疗效评价[J].医学理论与实践,2016,29(6):709-711.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-11-01