[1]潘健将,徐志杰.基于文献计量学的基本医疗领域定性研究现况分析[J].医学信息,2020,33(02):16-18.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.02.005]
　PAN Jian-jiang,XU Zhi-jie.An Analysis of the Current Status of Qualitative Research in Primary Care Fields Based on Bibliometrics[J].Medical Information,2020,33(02):16-18.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.02.005]
点击复制

基于文献计量学的基本医疗领域定性研究现况分析()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
33卷
期数:
2020年02期
页码:
16-18
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-01-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
An Analysis of the Current Status of Qualitative Research in Primary Care Fields Based on Bibliometrics
文章编号:
1006-1959（2020）02-0016-03
作者:
潘健将; 徐志杰
（浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院全科医学科，浙江 杭州 310016）
Author(s):
PAN Jian-jiang; XU Zhi-jie
(Department of General Medicine,Run Run Shaw Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016,Zhejiang,China)
关键词:
基本医疗; 定性研究; 文献计量学
Keywords:
Primary care; Qualitative research; Bibliometrics
分类号:
R-01
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.02.005
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
目的 分析2009~2018年被Web of Science 核心数据库收录的基本医疗领域内采用定性研究方法的原始研究类文献情况，探讨文献分布以及研究热点。方法 以Web of Science核心合集数据库为资料来源，采用标题检索查询的方式进行检索，检索式为[标题=（“primary care”）and标题=（“qualitative research”）OR（“qualitative study”）]。通过Web of Knowledge 网站中的分析检索工具，采用文献计量学方法分析文献的基本特征及研究热点。结果 共纳入文献623篇，2009~2018年年发文量呈增长趋势，2015年起年发文量快速增长；纳入文献来源于177种期刊出版物，其中发文量最多的期刊为BMC FAMILY PRACTICE和BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE，分别为90篇和83篇；文献被引次数最多为90次，平均被引次数为9.2次；以第一作者发文统计，发文量≥3篇的作者有5位。纳入的文献来自42个国家和地区，其中英国、美国、澳大利亚发文量最多，中国发文7篇；纳入文献的研究学科以内科学、卫生保健科学与服务、公共与环境卫生学3个学科为主，研究主题以内科疾病、初级卫生保健和保健科学服务为主。结论 2009~2018年基本医疗领域采用定性研究方法的文献逐年增多，其中以英国为代表的欧美国家发文量较多。目前该领域研究学科集中在内科学、卫生保健科学与服务、公共与环境卫生学，研究主题集中在内科疾病、初级卫生保健和保健科学服务。
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the original research literatures that used qualitative research methods in the primary care field included in the core database of Web of Science from 2009 to 2018, and to explore the literature distribution and research hotspots. Methods The core collection database of Web of Science was used as the data source. The search method was title search. The search formula was [title = ("primary care") and title = ("qualitative research") OR ("qualitative study")].Through the analysis and retrieval tools on the Web of Knowledge website, the bibliometric method is used to analyze the basic characteristics and research hotspots of the literature. Results A total of 623 articles were included, and the number of articles published increased from 2009 to 2018, and the number of articles published increased rapidly since 2015. The included documents came from 177 journal publications, of which the most frequently published journals were BMC FAMILY PRACTICE and BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 90 and 83, respectively; the maximum number of citations in the literature was 90, and the average number of citations was 9.2; according to the statistics of the first author, there were 5 authors with ≥3 articles. The literatures included were from 42 countries and regions, among which the United Kingdom, the United States, and Australia had the largest number of papers, and 7 papers were published in China.The research disciplines included in the literature are mainly three disciplines: internal medicine, health care science and services, and public and environmental health. The research topics are mainly medical diseases, primary health care and health science services. Conclusion From 2009 to 2018, the literature on qualitative research methods in the primary care field has been increasing year by year. Among them, the European and American countries represented by the United Kingdom have published more papers. At present, the research disciplines in this field are focused on internal medicine, health care science and services, public and environmental hygiene, and the research topics are focused on medical diseases, primary health care and health science services.

参考文献/References:

[1]WHO.The World Health Report 2008:primary health care - now more than ever[J].The World Health Report 2008:primary health care-now more than ever,2008,25(7):617. [2]Alterud K.Qualitative research:standards,challenges,and guidelines[J].Lancet,2001,358(9280):483-488. [3]Lee MS,Ray KN,Mehrotra A,et al.Primary care practitioners’perceptions of electronic consult systems a qualitative analysis[J].JAMA Intern Med,2018,178(6):782-789. [4]Rubinstein EB,Miller WL,Hudson SV,et al.Cancer survivorship care in advanced primary care practices a qualitative study of challenges and opportunities[J].JAMA Intern Med,2017,177(12):1726-1732. [5]Bower P,Macdonald W,Harkness E,et al.Multimorbidity,service organization and clinical decision making in primary care:a qualitative study[J].Family Practice,2011,28(5):579-587. [6]Fung C,Mercer S.A qualitative study of patients’views on quality of primary care consultations in Hong Kong and comparison with the UK CARE Measure[J].Bmc Family Practice,2009,10(1):10. [7]Wong SYS,Kung K,Wong MCS,et al.Primary care physicians’response to pandemic influenza in Hong Kong:a mixed quantitative and qualitative study[J].International Journal of Infectious Diseases,2012,16(9):e687-691. [8]Or C,Wong K,Tong E,et al.Private primary care physicians’perspectives on factors affecting the adoption of electronic medical records:a qualitative pre-implementation study[J].Work,2014,48(4):529. [9]Zhenyu M,Hui H,Qiang C,et al.Mental Health Services in Rural China:A Qualitativ Study of Primary Health Care Providers[J].BioMed Research International,2015(2015):1-6. [10]Zhang M,Wang W,Millar R,et al.Coping and compromise:a qualitative study of how primary health care providers respond to health reform in China[J].Human Resources for Health,2017,15(1):50. [11]Egui Z,Uno F,Smedberg A,et al.Exploring the needs and possibilities of physicians’continuing professional development - An exploitative qualitative study in a Chinese primary care context[J].PLOS ONE,2018,13(8):e0202635. [12]Wang M,Shao S,Li J,et al.The needs of informal caregivers and barriers of primary care workers toward dementia management in primary care:a qualitative study in Beijing[J].BMC Family Practice,2018,19(1):201. [13]于河,刘建平.定性研究方法及其在医学领域内的应用[J].循证医学,2008,8(5):292-296. [14]顾杰,潘志刚,沈瑶,等.上海市助理全科医生培训（3+2模式）配套政策的定性访谈研究[J].中华全科医师杂志,2015,14(7):516-520. [15]于河,刘建平,王思成.应用定性研究方法描述中医医患交流过程[J].北京中医药大学学报,2010,33(11):732-736. [16]玉婷,沈瑶,祝增珠,等.定性研究及其在全科医学科研中的应用[J].中华全科医师杂志,2014,13(1):18-21.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-01-15