[1]罗 鑫,陈贵儒,李晓莉.电子病历系统调查问卷的汉化及信效度检验[J].医学信息,2020,(04):90-93.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.04.027]
 LUO Xin,CHEN Gui-ru,LI Xiao-li.Chinesization of Electronic Health Record System Questionnaire and Reliability and Validity Test[J].Medical Information,2020,(04):90-93.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.04.027]
点击复制

电子病历系统调查问卷的汉化及信效度检验()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
期数:
2020年04期
页码:
90-93
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2020-02-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Chinesization of Electronic Health Record System Questionnaire and Reliability and Validity Test
文章编号:
1006-1959(2020)04-0090-04
作者:
罗 鑫陈贵儒李晓莉
(阿坝藏族羌族自治州人民医院手术室1,神经内科2,护理部3,四川 马尔康 624000)
Author(s):
LUO XinCHEN Gui-ruLI Xiao-li
(Operation Room1,Department of Neurology2,Department of Nursing3,People’s Hospital of Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture,Maerkang 624000,Sichuan,China)
关键词:
患者安全文化医疗信息技术电子病例医务人员认知
Keywords:
Patient safety cultureMedical information technologyElectronic health recordMedical staffCognition
分类号:
R
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.04.027
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 对美国医疗卫生保健研究与质量促进机构(AHRQ)电子病历系统调查问卷进行汉化,并检验其信效度。方法 方便抽取2所综合性三级医院453名医务人员作为研究对象,自行设计一般资料调查表调查研究对象的基本情况,对AHRQ电子病历系统调查问卷进行汉化。采用探索性性因子分析和验证性因子分析检验问卷结构效度,采用克郎巴赫系数评定问卷信度。结果 共回收问卷612份,2所医院员工应答率分别为56.58%、78.31%,问卷有效回收率为97.22%。研究对象平均年龄(34.210±8.114)岁,受教育程度以本科及以上为主,职称以初级为主,多为护士,从事本专业时间以1~5年最多。汉化电子病历系统调查问卷的Cronbach’s α系数为0.891,各维度Cronbach’s α系数在0.689~0.912,内容效度指数为0.920;探索性因子分析提取3个公因子,累计方差贡献率为75.434%;验证性因子分析模型拟合结果:?字2=37.863,df=16,P =0.002;RMR=0.042,RMSEA=0.077,GFI=0.967,AGFI=0.906,CFI=0.982。结论 汉化的电子病历系统调查问卷信效度良好,可用于评价我国医务人员对电子病历系统质量与安全的认知。
Abstract:
Objective To Chinesize the American Medical Care Research and Quality Promotion Agency (AHRQ) electronic health record system questionnaire and test its reliability and validity. Methods It was convenient to select 453 medical staff from two comprehensive tertiary hospitals as the research objects, design the general information questionnaire to investigate the basic situation of the research objects, and Chinesize the AHRQ electronic health record system questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to test the validity of the questionnaire structure, and the reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated using the Cronbach coefficient. Results A total of 612 questionnaires were collected. The response rates of the employees in the two hospitals were 56.58% and 78.31%, and the effective recovery rate of the questionnaires was 97.22%. The average age of the study subjects was (34.210±8.114) years old. Their education level was mainly at the undergraduate level or above. Their professional titles were mainly junior. Most of them were nurses. The most time spent in this major was 1 to 5 years. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the Chinese medical electronic health record system questionnaire was 0.891, the Cronbach’s α coefficient of each dimension was 0.689~0.912, and the content validity index was 0.920. The exploratory factor analysis extracted 3 common factors, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 75.434%. Factor analysis model fitting results:?字2=37.863,df=16,P=0.002; RMR=0.042,RMSEA=0.077, GFI = 0.967,AGFI=0.906,CFI=0.982.Conclusion The reliability and validity of the Chinese medical electronic health record questionnaire is good, and it can be used to evaluate the medical staff’s perception of the quality and safety of the electronic health record system.

参考文献/References:

[1]薛万国,李包罗.临床信息系统与电子病历[J].中国护理管理,2009,9(2):77-80. [2]Alotaibi YK,Federico F.The impact of health information technology on patient safety[J].Saudi Med J,2017,38(12):1173-1180. [3]徐冬萍,王伟,胡柳,等.ICU结构化电子护理记录单的设计与应用[J].护理学杂志,2019,34(2):21-23. [4]中国医院协会.中国医院协会患者安全目标(2019版)[EB/OL].[2019-09-02].http://www.cha.org.cn/plus/view.php?aid=15808. [5]Dogac A,Yuksel M,Avcl A,et al.Electronic Health Record Interoperability as Realized in the Turkish Health Information System[J].Methods of Information in Medicine,2011,50(2):140-149. [6]林敏,陈京立,康晓凤,等.临床护理分类系统在电子病历中的研究及应用进展[J].中国护理管理,2019,19(5):735-739. [7]陈武朝,张国,林英忠,等.新常态下我国医院医疗质量管理面临问题与对策思考[J].中国医院管理,2019,39(1):37-39. [8]Smith SA,Yount N,Sorra J.Exploring relationships between hospital patient safety culture and Consumer Reports safety scores[J].Bmc Health Services Research,2017,17(1):143. [9]王萍,毛俊,曾兢.护理研究[M].第1版.北京:科学出版社,2017:169-170. [10]胡雁.护理研究[M].第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:126-127. [11]孙振球,徐勇勇.医学统计学[M].第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:369-383. [12]许明.把脉医院供应链信息化当下已进入升级“黄金期”[J].中国医疗设备,2019,34(1):177-178. [13]Feldman SS,Buchalter S,Hayes LW.Health information technology in healthcare quality and patient safety:literature review[J].JMIR Med Inform,2018,6(2):e10264. [14]Williams A.Nursing informaticians address patient safety to improve usability of health information technologies[J].Stud Health Technol Inform,2019(257):501-507. [15]Kutney-Lee A,Sloane DM,Bowles KH,et al.Electronic health record adoption and nurse reports of usability and quality of care:the role of work environment[J].Appl Clin Inform,2019,10(1):129-139. [16]Vasconcelos PF,Arruda LP,Sousa Freire VEC,et al.Instruments for evaluation of safety culture in primary health care:integrative review of the literature[J].Public Health,2018(156):147-151. [17]王媛媛,王燕,石慧峰,等.国内外医疗机构患者安全文化测评工具的系统综述[J].中国医院管理,2018,38(1): 36-39. [18]王丽敏,赵秋利.我国病人安全护理测评工具研究进展[J].护理研究,2018,32(14):2189-2192. [19]陆鹰.移动护理信息系统在护理安全中的应用进展[J].中国护理管理,2015,15(S1):33-35. [20]Battles J B,Sorra J,Famolaro T,et al.Results from the AHRQ Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture[C]//World Congress on Ergonomics.2009. [21]Giai J,Boussat B,Occelli P,et al.Hospital survey on patient safety culture(HSOPS): variability of scoring strategies[J].Int J Qual Health Care,2017,29(5):685-692.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-02-15