[1]黄瑞岁,赵沁萍,丁 可,等.多模态MRI对乳腺X线摄影非肿块病变的诊断价值[J].医学信息,2020,33(08):84-86,91.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.08.027]
 HUANG Rui-sui,ZHAO Qin-ping,DING Ke,et al.Diagnostic Value of Multi-modality MRI in Non-mass Lesions of Mammography[J].Medical Information,2020,33(08):84-86,91.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.08.027]
点击复制

多模态MRI对乳腺X线摄影非肿块病变的诊断价值()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
33卷
期数:
2020年08期
页码:
84-86,91
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2020-04-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Diagnostic Value of Multi-modality MRI in Non-mass Lesions of Mammography
文章编号:
1006-1959(2020)08-0084-04
作者:
黄瑞岁赵沁萍丁 可
(南宁市第二人民医院放射科,广西 南宁 530031)
Author(s):
HUANG Rui-suiZHAO Qin-pingDING Keet al
(Department of Radiology,the Second People’s Hospital of Nanning,Nanning 530031,Guangxi,China)
关键词:
磁共振成像乳腺X线摄影乳腺肿瘤BI-RADS
Keywords:
Magnetic resonance imagingMammographyBreast tumorBI-RADS
分类号:
R445.2;R737.9
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.08.027
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨多模态MRI成像对乳腺X线摄影非肿块病变的诊断价值。方法 收集2018年1月~2019年8月我院行乳腺X线摄影检查诊断为非肿块类病变,经手术或活检病理证实为乳腺疾病的68例患者临床资料,患者均行常规平扫、动态增强扫描(DCE)和扩散加权成像(DWI)等乳腺MRI检查,依据乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)标准对X线和MRI表现进行分析和评估,以病理诊断为金标准,计算两种检查方法诊断病变的敏感度、特异度和准确度并比较。结果 病理结果示68例患者共有83个病灶,恶性病灶37个,良性病灶46个。乳腺X线摄影检出病灶75个,检出率为90.36%;其诊断恶性病灶35个,良性病灶40个,正确诊断恶性病灶28个,良性病灶32个,诊断的敏感度、特异度和准确度分别为77.78%、82.06%和80.00%。MRI检出病灶81个,检出率为97.59%;其诊断恶性病灶39个,良性病灶42个,正确诊断恶性病灶36个,良性病灶40个,诊断的敏感度、特异度和准确度分别为94.74%、93.03%和93.83%。乳腺X线摄影与MRI检查诊断非肿块病变的敏感度和准确度比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两种方法特异度比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 与乳腺X线摄影比较,多模态MRI成像不但能提高病变的检出率,还可提高非肿块病变诊断的敏感度和准确度,为良恶性病变的鉴别提供更多的影像学支持。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the diagnostic value of multimodal MRI imaging in non-mass lesions of mammography.Methods Collected clinical data of 68 patients diagnosed as non-mass lesions by mammography in our hospital from January 2018 to August 2019, and confirmed to be breast disease by surgery or biopsy.All patients underwent routine plain scan and dynamic enhancement Breast MRI examinations such as scan (DCE) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), analyze and evaluate the X-ray and MRI performance according to the breast imaging report and data system (BI-RADS) standard, with pathological diagnosis as the gold standard examination method diagnoses the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the lesion and compares.Results The pathological results showed that 68 patients had 83 lesions, 37 malignant lesions, and 46 benign lesions. Mammography detected 75 lesions with a detection rate of 90.36%; it diagnosed 35 malignant lesions, 40 benign lesions, 28 correctly diagnosed malignant lesions, and 32 benign lesions. The degrees were 77.78%, 82.06% and 80.00%, respectively. MRI detected 81 lesions with a detection rate of 97.59%; its diagnosis was 39 malignant lesions, 42 benign lesions, 36 correctly diagnosed malignant lesions, and 40 benign lesions. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the diagnosis were: 94.74%, 93.03% and 93.83%,the difference between the sensitivity and accuracy of mammography and MRI in the diagnosis of non-mass lesions was statistically significant(P<0.05). The specificity comparison between the two methods was not statistically significant (P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with mammography, multimodal MRI imaging can not only improve the detection rate of lesions, but also improve the sensitivity and accuracy of the diagnosis of non-mass lesions, and provide more imaging support for the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions.

参考文献/References:

[1]张亚平,董光,耿海,等.DCE-MRI和DWI对乳腺腺病和乳腺癌的诊断价值[J].实用放射学杂志,2017,4(33):533-536,553.[2]Li L,Wang K,Sun X,et al.Parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as imaging markers for angiogenesis and proliferation in human breast cancer[J].Med Sci Monit,2015(21):376-382.[3]李晶英,赵殿江.乳腺MRI非肿块样强化病变的影像学诊断进展[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2018,26(7):547-551.[4]刘媛,归奕飞.致密型乳腺影像学筛查技术及进展[J].实用放射学杂志,2017,33(1):138-140,164.[5]陈倩,沈玉英,陈双庆,等.多模态MRI对致密型乳腺中乳腺癌的诊断价值[J].实用放射学杂志,2016,32(10):1535-1538.[6]中华医学会影像技术分会,中华医学会放射学分会.乳腺影像检查技术专家共识[J].中华放射学杂志,2016,50(8):561-565.[7]Orel SG,Schnall MD.MR imaging of the breast for the detection,diagnosis,and staging of breat cancer[J].Radiology,2001,220(1):13-30.[8]中华医学会放射学分会乳腺专业委员会专家组.乳腺磁共振检查及诊断规范专家共识.肿瘤影像学[J].2017,26(4):241-249.[9]韦苇,黄仲奎,谢东,等.动态增强MRI结合DWI对乳腺疾病BI-RADS分类的诊断价值[J].广东医学,2016,37(2):256-260.[10]Brandao AC,Lehman CD,Partridge SC,et al.Breast magnetic resonance imaging; diffusion-weighted imaging[J].Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am,2013,21(2):321-336.[11]赵欣,苏丹柯,阳君,等.MRI时间-信号强度曲线测量区域选择对乳腺病变的定性诊断[J].临床放射学杂志,2017,36(8):1093-1096.[12]陈传新,胡春洪,马岩,等.MRI摄影对乳腺X线摄影中“局灶性不对称”征象的诊断价值[J].实用放射学杂志,2016,32(5):710-712,724.[13]彭琲,龙莉玲.乳腺MRI与乳腺X线摄影在乳腺疾病中的诊断价值分析[J].放射学实践,2017,32(3):248-252.

相似文献/References:

[1]雷少晖,张永海.脑氧代谢的影像学测定方法研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(05):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.015]
 LEI Shao-hui,ZHANG Yong-hai.Imaging Study of Brain Oxygen Metabolism[J].Medical Information,2018,31(08):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.015]
[2]管海生.膝关节剥脱性骨软骨炎MRI诊断[J].医学信息,2018,31(06):158.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.06.056]
 GUAN Hai-sheng.MRI Diagnosis of Exfoliative Osteochondritis in Knee Joint[J].Medical Information,2018,31(08):158.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.06.056]
[3]刘 钢,李志伟,田 晞,等.磁共振检查对冯·希佩尔·林道综合征诊断的意义[J].医学信息,2018,31(18):145.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.18.047]
 LIU Gang,LI Zhi-wei,TIAN Xi,et al.The Significance of Magnetic Resonance Examination in the Diagnosis of Von Hippel-Lindau Disease[J].Medical Information,2018,31(08):145.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.18.047]
[4]马平平,程宇琪,许秀峰,等.抑郁症脑磁共振成像与抗抑郁治疗临床改善间关系的研究进展[J].医学信息,2018,31(24):31.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.24.009]
 MA Ping-ping,CHENG Yu-qi,XU Xiu-feng,et al.Advances in Research on the Relationship between Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Improvement of Antidepressant Therapy[J].Medical Information,2018,31(08):31.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.24.009]
[5]刘姗灵,冉 冉,涂 刚.乳腺Paget′s 病诊断与治疗相关研究进展[J].医学信息,2019,32(07):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.07.001]
 LIU Shan-ling,RAN Ran,TU Gang.Advances in Research on Diagnosis and Treatment of Paget's Disease in Breast[J].Medical Information,2019,32(08):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.07.001]
[6]蔡 彬,黄 伟,储正达,等.直肠腔内超声与相控阵线圈磁共振在直肠癌术前局部分期中的Meta分析[J].医学信息,2019,32(10):70.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.024]
 CAI Bin,HUANG Wei,CHU Zheng-da,et al.Meta-analysis of Intra-rectal Ultrasound and Phased-array Magnetic Resonance in the Preoperative Partial Phase of Rectal Cancer[J].Medical Information,2019,32(08):70.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.024]
[7]黄亚勇,师毅冰,陈国芳,等.颅内生殖细胞瘤的MRI影像表现及诊断[J].医学信息,2019,32(20):167.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.20.053]
 HUANG Ya-yong,SHI Yi-bing,CHEN Guo-fang,et al.MRI Imaging Findings and Diagnosis of Intracranial Germ Cell Tumor[J].Medical Information,2019,32(08):167.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.20.053]
[8]王召华,李小虎,钱银锋,等.MRI对胰腺导管内乳头状粘液瘤良恶性的诊断价值[J].医学信息,2019,32(14):166.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.14.056]
 WANG Zhao-hua,LI Xiao-hu,QIAN Yin-feng,et al.Diagnostic Value of MRI for Benign and Malignant Intraductal Papillary Myxoma of the Pancreas[J].Medical Information,2019,32(08):166.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.14.056]
[9]刘军莲,戴 娜,杨 迎,等.全脊柱MRI对强直性脊柱炎急性炎症的诊断价值[J].医学信息,2019,32(16):167.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.16.057]
 LIU Jun-lian,DAI Na,YANG Ying,et al.Diagnostic Value of Total Spine MRI in Acute Inflammation of Ankylosing Spondylitis[J].Medical Information,2019,32(08):167.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.16.057]
[10]陈 萍,王培军,石瑛琦,等.安氏III类错颌畸形患者颞下颌关节的MRI检查研究[J].医学信息,2020,33(08):51.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.08.017]
 CHEN Ping,WANG Pei-jun,SHI Ying-qi,et al.MRI Examination of Temporomandibular Joint in Patients with Angle class Ⅲ Malocclusion[J].Medical Information,2020,33(08):51.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.08.017]
[11]李瑞梅.1.5T磁共振成像与乳腺X线摄影诊断乳腺良恶性肿瘤的价值[J].医学信息,2021,34(21):168.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.21.048]
 LI Rui-mei.Value of 1.5T MRI and Mammography in Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors[J].Medical Information,2021,34(08):168.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.21.048]

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-04-15