[1]廖春雨.胸腰段骨折的分型及治疗现状[J].医学信息,2020,33(15):34-36.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.15.012]
 LIAO Chun-yu.Classification and Treatment Status of Thoracolumbar Fractures[J].Medical Information,2020,33(15):34-36.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.15.012]
点击复制

胸腰段骨折的分型及治疗现状()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
33卷
期数:
2020年15期
页码:
34-36
栏目:
综述
出版日期:
2020-08-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Classification and Treatment Status of Thoracolumbar Fractures
文章编号:
1006-1959(2020)15-0034-03
作者:
廖春雨
天津市蓟州区人民医院骨一科,天津 301900
Author(s):
LIAO Chun-yu
Department of Orthopedics,Subject One,People’s Hospital of Jizhou District,Tianjin 301900,Chin
关键词:
胸腰段骨折骨折分型神经损伤手术治疗非手术治疗
Keywords:
Thoracolumbar fracturesFracture classificationNerve injurySurgical treatment Non-surgical treatment
分类号:
R687.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.15.012
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
胸腰段脊柱骨折是临床常见的骨折类型,通常合并神经损伤,尤其是高能量损伤后容易出现畸形或瘫痪,严重影响患者生活质量。对胸腰段骨折进行规范化分型,准确描述脊柱损伤特点和神经症状是有效治疗的基础。目前,关于胸腰段骨折分型缺乏统一的标准,且已有分型标准在指导制定治疗方案方面存在争议。本文主要对胸腰段骨折的分型、手术与非手术治疗进展进行综述,旨在为临床治疗该病提供参考依据。
Abstract:
Thoracolumbar spine fracture is a common type of fracture in clinic, usually combined with nerve injury, especially deformity or paralysis after high energy injury, which seriously affects the quality of life of patients. Standardized classification of thoracolumbar fractures and accurate description of the characteristics of spinal injuries and neurological symptoms are the basis for effective treatment. At present, there is no unified standard for the classification of thoracolumbar fractures, and the existing classification standards are controversial in guiding the formulation of treatment plans. This article mainly reviews the classification, surgical and non-surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures, and aims to provide a reference for the clinical treatment of the disease.

参考文献/References:

[1]范顺武,胡志军.胸腰段骨折分型及手术治疗的争议问题[J].中华创伤杂志,2017,33(7):585-588.[2]Curfs I,Grimm B,Van der Linde M,et al.Radiological prediction of posttraumatic kyphosis after thoracolumbar fracture[J].Open OrthopJ,2016,10(1):135-142.[3]聂锋锋,张英华,黄寿国,等.经皮微创椎弓根螺钉内固定与开放手术治疗胸腰椎骨折:Cobb’s 角与椎体前缘高度恢复的比较[J].中国组织工程研究,2014,18(44):7094-7099.[4]中国康复医学会脊柱脊髓损伤专业委员会.《新鲜胸腰段脊柱脊髓损伤评估与治疗》的专家共识[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2011,21(11):963-968.[5]王盛海,盛杰鑫,龙芳,等.胸腰椎骨折术中椎弓根损伤形态与伤椎置钉及植骨的选择[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2017,32(5):499-501.[6]曾忠友.伴完全性脊髓神经损伤胸腰椎骨折手术治疗的相关问题[J].中华创伤杂志,2015,31(7):581-584.[7]Hitchon PW,Abode-Iyamah K,Dahdaleh NS,et al.Nonoperative Management in Neurologically Intact Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes[J].Spine,2016,41(6):483-489.[8]Hiyama A,Watanabe M,Katoh H,et al.Relationships between posterior ligamentous complex injury and radiographic parameters in patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures[J].Injury,2015,46(2):392-398.[9]冯晶,杜世阳,黄觅,等.3 种手术方法治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效比较[J].实用医学杂志,2017,33(6):923-927.[10]刘少喻,谢超凡.创伤性胸腰椎骨折的手术指征及时机[J].中华创伤杂志,2015,31(9):796-799.[11]Chau AMT,Xu LL,Pelzer NR,et al.Timing of surgical intervention in cauda equina syndrome:a systematic critical review[J].World Neurosurgery,2014,81(3):640-650.[12]谭小欣,曹向军,曹飞.胸腰椎骨折患者手术部位感染的危险因素[J].中国感染控制杂志,2017,16(3):218-220.[13]赵漓波,胡文山.经皮微创与传统开放椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗老年胸腰段脊柱压缩性骨折患者的对比研究[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2018,17(10):757-761.[14]方钧,郑季男,杨培伟,等.椎弓根钉棒系统联合椎体支柱块治疗胸腰椎骨折的生物力学试验及临床应用[J].颈腰痛杂志,2016,37(3):176-181.[15]程伟.经伤椎固定治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的效果和安全性分析[J].中国当代医药,2014,21(21):65-66.[16]张骞,扈桂海,侯学全.经伤椎单侧固定和跨伤椎固定治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的疗效比较[J].中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2016,19(1):39-42.[17]陈晓斌,陈晓光.椎弓根螺钉联合连接棒内固定法治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的效果分析[J].河南医学研究,2017,26(14):2626-2627.[18]赵兴,朱刃,徐文斌,等.Ⅰ期后前路内固定治疗严重胸腰椎骨折的疗效[J].中华创伤杂志,2017,33(3):208-212.[19]Shao RX,Zhou H,Pan H,et al.Clinical efficacy of unilateral percutaneous transfacet screws combined with contralateral pedicle screw versus bilateral pedicle screws fixation in the treatment of the degenerative lumbar disease[J].China Journal of Orthopaedics&Traumatology,2017,30(9):817.[20]Zou W,Xiao J,Long H,et al.Design and clinical application of a newextracorporeal reduction device for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in treatment of thoracolumbar fractures[J].Chinese Journal of Repair and Reconstruction Surgery,2017,31(1):66.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01