[1]戴小华,简桂女,喻华妹,等.俯卧位通气联合振动排痰在吸入性损伤并发ARDS中的应用[J].医学信息,2021,34(01):182-184.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.01.051]
　DAI Xiao-hua,JIAN Gui-nv,YU Hua-mei,et al.Application of Prone Position Ventilation Combined with Vibration Expectoration in Inhalation Injury Complicated by ARDS[J].Medical Information,2021,34(01):182-184.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.01.051]
点击复制

俯卧位通气联合振动排痰在吸入性损伤并发ARDS中的应用()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年01期
页码:
182-184
栏目:
护理研究
出版日期:
2021-01-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of Prone Position Ventilation Combined with Vibration Expectoration in Inhalation Injury Complicated by ARDS
文章编号:
1006-1959（2021）01-0182-03
作者:
戴小华; 简桂女; 喻华妹; 等
（南昌大学第一附属医院烧伤科，江西 南昌 330006）
Author(s):
DAI Xiao-hua; JIAN Gui-nv; YU Hua-mei; et al.
(Department of Burns,the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University,Nanchang 330006,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
俯卧位通气; 振动排痰; 吸入性损伤; ARDS
Keywords:
Prone position ventilation; Vibration expectoration; Inhalation injury; ARDS
分类号:
R473
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.01.051
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 观察俯卧位通气联合镇痛排痰治疗吸入性损伤并发急性呼吸窘迫综合征（ARDS）的效果。方法 选取2018年2月~2020年2月我院接诊的64例吸入性损伤并发ARDS患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组，各32例。对照组采用俯卧位通气治疗，观察组在对照组基础上行予振动排痰治疗，比较两组呼吸动力学指标[心率（HR）、动脉血氧分压（PaO2）、动脉血二氧化碳分压（PaCO2）、动脉压（MAP）、血氧饱和度（SaO2）、氧合指数（OI）、气道峰压（PIP）、气道阻力（Raw）]血流动力学指标[中心静脉压（CVP）、血管通透性指数（PVPI）、血管外肺水指数（EVLWI）]、舒适度评分及并发症发生情况。结果 治疗后观察组HR、PaCO2、PIP、Raw均低于对照组，PaO2、MAP、SaO2、OI均高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；治疗后观察组CVP高于对照组，PVPI、EVLW均低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；治疗后观察组舒适度评分均高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组并发症发生率为15.62%，低于对照组的28.12%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 俯卧位通气联合振动排痰可促进呼吸功能和血流动力学改善，增加排痰量，减轻患者痛苦，提高其舒适度，降低并发症发生率。
Abstract:
Objective To observe the effect of prone position ventilation combined with analgesia and expectoration in the treatment of inhalation injury complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).Methods 64 patients with inhalation injury complicated by ARDS who were admitted to our hospital from February 2018 to February 2020 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 32 cases in each group. The control group was treated with prone position ventilation, and the observation group was treated with vibration expectoration on the basis of the control group. The respiratory dynamics indexes of the two groups were compared [heart rate (HR), arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), arterial pressure (MAP), blood oxygen saturation (SaO2), oxygenation index (OI), peak airway pressure (PIP), airway resistance (Raw)] hemodynamic indicators [central venous pressure (CVP) , Vascular Permeability Index (PVPI), Extravascular Lung Water Index (EVLWI)], comfort score, and complications.Results After treatment, HR, PaCO2, PIP and Raw of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, PaO2, MAP, SaO2, and OI were all higher than those of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05); CVP of the observation group was higher than the control group after treatment,PVPI and EVLW were lower than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05); the comfort scores of the observation group were higher than the control group after treatment, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05);the incidence of complications in the observation group was 15.62%, which was lower than 28.12% in the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Prone position ventilation combined with vibration sputum excretion can improve respiratory function and hemodynamics, increase sputum excretion, relieve patients’ pain, improve their comfort, and reduce the incidence of complications.

参考文献/References:

[1]童朝巧,贺航咏.机械通气治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征的生理学基础与策略[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2014,37(11):865-869. [2]朱峰.吸入性损伤的临床诊断和防治对策[J].中华烧伤杂志,2018,34(5):293-296. [3]刘浏.应用呼吸机辅助治疗吸入性损伤的临床疗效观察[J].中国医药指南,2018,16(2):160-161. [4]历虎,张明珠,齐长春.重度吸入性损伤治疗中肺保护性通气的应用研究[J].国际医药卫生导报,2017,11(5):32. [5]徐风瑞,乔亮,韩伟,等.大面积烧伤并发脓毒症的独立危险因素[J].中华创伤杂志,2016,32(3):237-240. [6]韩国鑫,王本超,李朔朔,等.高频正压通气模式対烟雾吸入性肺损伤致急性呼吸窘迫综合征青年患者白介素水平的影响[J].中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志,2017,12(2):120-122. [7]Bass CM,Sajed DR,Adedipe AA,et al.Pulmonary ultrasound andpulse oximetry versus chest radiography and arterial blood gasanalysis for the diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome:a polot study[J].Crit Care,2015,19(1):282. [8]姚玉龙,雷鸣,李文放,等.肺通气评分评估急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者血管外肺水的价值[J].第二军医大学学报,2018,39(1):57-61. [9]马红,周敏,陈晓娟.人工鼻在烧伤合并吸入性损伤气管切开术中的应用及护理[J].华西医学,2014,29(4):770-771. [10]米洁,黄桃,高西.俯卧位通气在急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的应用及护理干预研究[J].重庆医学,2017,46(14):1904-1906. [11]Volpicelli G,Skurzak S,Boero E,et al.Lung ultrasound predicts well extravascular lung water but is of limited usefulness in the prediction of wedge pressure[J].Anesthesiology,2014,121(2): 320-327. [12]张瑞霞,李玉凤.ARDS18例实施俯卧位通气的护理难点及对策[J].中国误诊学杂志,2014,11(26):6504-6505. [13]Kim WY,Hong SB.Sepsis and acut erespiratory distress syndrome:recent up date[J].Tuberc Respir Dis(Seoul),2016,79(2):53-57. [14]熊恩平,周泽云.不同气道湿化和吸痰方法对预防急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者痰痂形成的影响[J].中华护理杂志,2014,16(4):341-343. [15]刘笑雷,张国强.俯卧位通气治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征研究进展[J].实用医院临床杂志,2015,9(1):15-18.

相似文献/References:

[1]何 林.纤支镜吸痰联合俯卧位通气治疗 重症吸入性肺炎的效果观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(15):103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.15.032]
　HE Lin.Observation on the Effect of Fibrobronchoscope Suction Combined with Prone Position Ventilation in the Treatment of Severe Aspiration Pneumonia[J].Medical Information,2018,31(01):103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.15.032]
[2]刘 伟,郑丽红,梁晓丽,等.俯卧位通气在复杂先天性心脏病患儿延迟关胸术后低氧血症的应用[J].医学信息,2020,33(02):181.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.02.059]
　LIU Wei,ZHENG Li-hong,LIANG Xiao-li,et al.Application of Prone Ventilation in Children with Complex Congenital Heart Disease with Delayed Hypoxemia after Delayed Chest Closure[J].Medical Information,2020,33(01):181.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.02.059]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01