[1]郝保良.等离子针状电极剜切治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的效果[J].医学信息,2021,34(04):148-150.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.04.040]
　HAO Bao-liang.Effect Plasma Needle Electrode Enucleation for Non-muscular Invasive Carcinoma of Urinary Bladder[J].Medical Information,2021,34(04):148-150.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.04.040]
点击复制

等离子针状电极剜切治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的效果()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年04期
页码:
148-150
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-02-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect Plasma Needle Electrode Enucleation for Non-muscular Invasive Carcinoma of Urinary Bladder
文章编号:
1006-1959（2021）04-0148-03
作者:
郝保良
（辽阳泌尿外科医院泌尿外科，辽宁 辽阳 111000）
Author(s):
HAO Bao-liang
(Department of Urology,Liaoyang Urological Hospital,Liaoyang 111000,Liaoning,China)
关键词:
尿道双极; 等离子环状电极肿瘤切除术; 等离子针状电极剜切术; 非肌层浸润性; 膀胱癌
Keywords:
Urethral bipolar; Plasma ring electrode tumor resection; Plasma needle electrode enucleation; Non-muscle invasive; Carcinoma of urinary bladder
分类号:
R699.5
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.04.040
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探究等离子针状电极剜切治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的治疗效果，为临床实践提供理论依据。方法 选取2016年4月~2019年4月辽阳泌尿外科医院收治的非肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者80例，按照随机数字表法分为参照组与研究组，每组40例。参照组采用尿道双极等离子环状电极肿瘤切除术，研究组采用尿道双极等离子针状电极剜切术治疗，比较两组治疗情况、组织病理标本保留肌层率、并发症发病率、生活质量、复发情况。结果 研究组术中出血量、导尿管留置时间、住院时间均优于参照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。研究组组织病理标本保留肌层率高于参照组（10.00% vs 77.50%），差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。研究组术后并发症发病率低于参照组（5.00% vs 20.00%），差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。研究组术后生活质量评分高于参照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。研究组术后1年复发率低于参照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 非肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者实施尿道双极等离子针状电极剜切术治疗有助于减少术中出血量，缩短治疗时间，有效改善患者的生活质量，且该术式远期疗效良好，有助于降低复发率，治疗效果确切。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the therapeutic effect of plasma needle electrode enucleation for non-muscular invasive carcinoma of urinary bladder,to provide a theoretical basis for clinical practice.Methods A total of 80 patients with non-muscular invasive carcinoma of urinary bladderadmitted to Liaoyang Urological Hospital from April 2016 to April 2019 were selected and divided into a reference group and a study group according to a random number table, with 40 cases in each group.The reference group used urethral bipolar plasma ring electrode tumor resection, and the study group used urethral bipolar plasma needle electrode enucleation.The treatment conditions, the rate of histopathological specimen preservation, the incidence of complications, the quality of life, and the recurrence of the two groups were compared.Results The amount of blood loss, catheter indwelling time, and length of stay in the study group were better than those in the reference group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The muscle layer retention rate of histopathological specimens in the study group was higher than that in the reference group (10.00% vs 77.50%),the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications in the study group was lower than that in the reference group (5.00% vs 20.00%),the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The postoperative quality of life score of the study group was higher than that of the reference group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The 1 year postoperative recurrence rate in the study group was lower than that in the reference group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion Patients with non-muscular invasive carcinoma of urinary bladder undergoing urethral bipolar plasma needle electrode enucleation can help reduce intraoperative blood loss, shorten treatment time, and effectively improve the patient’s quality of life. The long-term effect of this procedure is good. It helps to reduce the recurrence rate, and the treatment effect is definite.

参考文献/References:

[1]韩雪,赵佳,黄辰曦,等.2002-2012年上海市杨浦区社区人群膀胱癌的发病和生存情况分析[J].第二军医大学学报,2014. [2]门群利,李涛,罗晓辉,等.经尿道等离子针状电极剜除术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱肿瘤的临床分析[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2017,22(5):365-367,372. [3]耿爱民,林西斌.经尿道等离子针状电极剜除术治疗非浸润性膀胱癌疗效观察[J].海南医学,2020,31(10):1266-1268. [4]王国桥,龚永明.经尿道双极等离子针状电极与环状电极治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的效果比较[J].中国民康医学,2019,31(15):55-57. [5]秦克松,李金乾.膀胱癌行经尿道肿瘤电切术应用吉西他滨行膀胱灌注化疗的疗效观察[J].现代诊断与治疗,2019,30(3):134-136. [6]丁友鹏,王志新,马亚南,等.经尿道双极等离子针状电极与环状电极治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的疗效对比分析[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2018,7(6):410-413. [7]童宏华,李忠来,桂金勇,等.经尿道等离子针状电极加凝固电极膀胱肿瘤逐层整块切除术的临床研究[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2019,34(6):459-462,465. [8]黄诗桥,马勇,王尚任,等.经尿道等离子针状电极膀胱肿瘤整块切除术的疗效观察[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2017,38(5):387-390. [9]闫伟,乔庐东,杜震,等.经尿道双极等离子针状电极肿瘤整块切除术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱尿路上皮癌的临床分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2016,37(9):672-676. [10]丁友鹏.经尿道双极等离子针状电极膀胱肿瘤精准切除术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的初步研究[D].吉林大学,2019. [11]涂涛,范大渊,唐亮,等.经尿道等离子棒状电极整块剜除治疗浅表性膀胱癌[J].中国微创外科杂志,2020,20(7):616-618. [12]吴宝军,薛春晓,徐庆祝.经尿道双极等离子电切术与传统开放手术治疗膀胱癌的效果及其对并发症发生率影响分析[J].中国处方药,2020,18(2):152-153. [13]胡嘏,叶章群,陈耀兵,等.经尿道膀胱肿瘤整块切除术标本病理学规范化检查的临床意义[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2019,40(7):492-497. [14]郭烽,魏辉,张晓忠,等.经尿道针状电极膀胱颈内切开治疗膀胱颈挛缩[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2006,21(10):772-773. [15]韩聪祥,林吓聪,黄宏伟,等.改良经尿道膀胱肿瘤整块切除术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌21例分析[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2020,25(7):614-616,630. [16]段晓波,代庆德,周婷婷.非肌层浸润性膀胱癌采用 两种TURBT术治疗的效果及预后对比研究[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2020,19(12):1322-1325.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01