[1]王来毅,魏成建,吴 佳.双钢板与三钢板内固定治疗Schatzker V~Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折的Meta分析[J].医学信息,2021,34(15):60-65.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.15.016]
　WANG Lai-yi,WEI Cheng-jian,WU Jia.Meta-analysis of the Treatment of Schatzker Type V~Ⅵ Tibial Plateau Fractures with Double-plate and Triple-plate Internal Fixation[J].Medical Information,2021,34(15):60-65.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.15.016]
点击复制

双钢板与三钢板内固定治疗Schatzker V~Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折的Meta分析()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年15期
页码:
60-65
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2021-08-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Meta-analysis of the Treatment of Schatzker Type V~Ⅵ Tibial Plateau Fractures with Double-plate and Triple-plate Internal Fixation
文章编号:
1006-1959（2021）15-0060-06
作者:
王来毅; 魏成建; 吴 佳
（1.南京中医药大学第一临床医学院，江苏 南京 210000； 2.江苏省中医院骨伤科，江苏 南京 210000）
Author(s):
WANG Lai-yi; WEI Cheng-jian; WU Jia
(1.The First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine,Nanjing 210000,Jiangsu,China; 2.Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology,Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine,Nanjing 210000,Jiangsu,China)
关键词:
双钢板; 三钢板; 胫骨平台骨折
Keywords:
Double plate; Three plate; Tibial plateau fracture
分类号:
R683.42；R687.32；R687.4
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.15.016
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 系统评价双钢板与三钢板内固定治疗Schatzker V~Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折临床疗效，为临床应用提供理论依据。方法 运用计算机检索 1900 年 1 月1日~2020 年 8月31日的 PubMed、Web of Science、Ovid、Cochrane Library、中国知识资源总库、维普中文科技期刊全文数据库、万方数据学术论文总库、中国生物医学文献服务系统，搜集复杂型胫骨平台骨折临床疗效比较的对照研究。制定入选和剔除标准，筛选出符合纳入标准的文献，评价纳入研究的方法学质量。利用Rev-Man5.3进行Meta分析。结果 最终有7篇研究符合纳入标准，共420例患者，其中双钢板组209例，三钢板组211例。Meta分析结果显示：双钢板组与三钢板组的手术时间[MD=-0.74，95%CI（-0.95，-0.53），P＜0.00001；Test of SMD=0:z=4.74，P＜0.00001]、术中出血量[MD=-0.41，95%CI（-0.62，-0.20），P=0.736；Test of SMD=0:z=3.86，P＜0.00001]、膝关节功能恢复优良率[MD=0.21，95%CI（0.11，0.38），P=0.53；Test of OR=1:z=4.83，P=0.000]、HSS评分[MD=-0.82，95%CI（-1.36，-0.27），P=0.001；Test of SMD=0:z=2.93，P=0.003]，差异均有统计学意义。双钢板组与三钢板组的骨折愈合时间[MD=-0.64，95%CI（-0.03，1.32），P=0.00000；Test of SMD=0:z=1.87，P=0.062]、术后完全负重时间[MD=-0.87，95%CI（-0.19，1.92），P=0. 000；Test of SMD=0:z=1.61，P=0.108]、术后并发症[MD=1.77，95%CI（0.94，3.36），P=0.717；Test of OR=1:z=1.73, P=0.084]，差异均无统计学意义。结论 两种术式在手术时间及术后恢复情况大致相同情况下，三钢板内固定术相较之下优于双钢板内固定术，可缩短患者骨折愈合时间，有助于患者术后功能康复，但鉴于纳入研究存在选择性偏倚和测量性偏倚的高度可能性，还需更多科学慎密的临床随机对照研究加以证实。
Abstract:
Objective To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of double-plate and triple-plate internal fixation in the treatment of Schatzker V~Ⅵ tibial plateau fractures, and to provide a theoretical basis for clinical application.Methods A computer was used to search PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid, Cochrane Library, China Knowledge Resources Database, Weipu Chinese Science and Technology Journal Full-text Database, Wanfang Data Academic Papers Database from January 1, 1900 to August 31, 2020. The Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System collects comparative studies on the clinical efficacy of complex tibial plateau fractures.Formulate selection and rejection criteria, screen out documents that meet the inclusion criteria, and evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies.Meta analysis was performed using Rev-Man5.3.Results In the end, 7 studies met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 420 patients, including 209 in the double-plate group and 211 in the three-plate group.Meta-analysis results show: the operation time of the double-plate group and the three-plate group [MD=-0.74, 95%CI (-0.95, -0.53), P＜0.00001; Test of SMD=0:z=4.74, P＜0.00001],intraoperative blood loss [MD=-0.41, 95%CI (-0.62, -0.20), P=0.736;Test of SMD=0:z=3.86, P＜0.00001], excellent and good rate of knee joint function recovery [MD=0.21, 95%CI (0.11, 0.38), P=0.53;Test of OR=1:z=4.83, P=0.000], HSS score [MD=-0.82, 95%CI (-1.36, -0.27), P=0.001;Test of SMD=0:z=2.93, P=0.003], the differences were statistically significant.The fracture healing time of the double-plate group and the three-plate group [MD=-0.64, 95%CI (-0.03, 1.32), P=0.00000; Test of SMD=0:z=1.87, P=0.062], postoperative full weight bearing time [MD=-0.87, 95%CI (-0.19, 1.92), P=0. 000;Test of SMD=0:z=1.61, P=0.108], postoperative complications [MD=1.77, 95%CI (0.94, 3.36), P=0.717;Test of OR=1:z=1.73, P=0.084], the differences were not statistically significant.Conclusion When the operation time and postoperative recovery of the two surgical methods are roughly the same, the three-plate internal fixation is better than the double-plate internal fixation.It can shorten the fracture healing time of patients and help patients recover their functions after surgery.However, in view of the high possibility of selection bias and measurement bias in the included studies, more scientific and rigorous clinical randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm.

参考文献/References:

[1]孙豪君,潘宇杰,赵健宇,等.膝关节伸直状态下胫骨平台骨折受伤机制的有限元分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2017,19(10):866-873. [2]Hosokawa T,Arai Y,Nakagawa S,et al.Total knee arthroplasty with corrective osteotomy for knee osteoarthritis associated with malunion after tibial plateau fracture:a case report[J].BMC Res Notes,2017,10(1):223. [3]Bove F,Sala F,Capitani P,et al.Treatment of fractures of the tibial plateau(Schatzker VI)with external fixators versus plate osteosynthesis[J].Injury,2018,49(Suppl 3):S12-S18. [4]Rohra N,Suri HS,Gangrade K.Functional and Radiological Outcome of Schatzker type V and VI Tibial Plateau Fracture Treatment with Dual Plates with Minimum 3 years follow-up:A Prospective Study[J].J Clin Diagn Res,2016,10(5):RC05-RC10. [5]Dhillon MS,Patel S,Puneeth K.Simple four column classification can dictate treatment for intra articular tibial plateau fractures much better than ten segment classification [J].Injury,2017,48 (6):1276-1278. [6]顾立强.胫骨平台骨折的分类与功能评价[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2004(3):87-91. [7]谷鸿秋,王杨,李卫.Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具在随机对照研究Meta分析中的应用[J].中国循环杂志,2014(2):147-148. [8]杜道广.联合入路三钢板内固定治疗胫骨平台三柱骨折的临床疗效及其危险因素分析[D].郑州大学,2018. [9]孙超.联合入路三钢板与双钢板内固定对于胫骨平台三柱骨折疗效对比分析[D].吉林大学,2017. [10]叶鹏胜.联合入路下不同固定方式对胫骨平台三柱骨折患者膝关节功能恢复及术后并发症的影响[J].贵州医药,2018,42(3):322-323. [11]黄良库,徐涛,许玉本,等.联合入路下不同固定方式治疗胫骨平台三柱骨折疗效观察[J].海南医学,2019,30(24):3181-3183. [12]左斌,车彪,喻忠斌.前后联合双切口三固定方案治疗合并三柱损伤的复杂胫骨平台粉碎性骨折[J].中国现代医生,2016,54(31):54-56,63. [13]赵鹏鹏.三钢板治疗SchatzkerⅤ、Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折的临床疗效分析[D].山东中医药大学,2014. [14]陈其荣,穆洪鑫,花元春,等.三钢板及双钢板内固定治疗涉及三柱的复杂胫骨平台骨折的疗效[J].江苏医药,2019,45(8):838-841. [15]李红颜.Meta分析中识别发表偏倚方法的比较[D].第一军医大学,2007. [16]黄砖枝,林斌,何永志,等.mippo结合双钢板内固定治疗SchatzkerⅥ型胫骨平台骨折[J].临床骨科杂志,2014,17(5):572,575. [17]Timmers TK,Van Der Ven DJ,et al.Functional outcome after tibial plateau fracture osteosynthesis:a mean followup of 6years[J].Knee,2014,21(6):1210-1215. [18]李林涛,梁羽.应用三柱理论手术治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折的临床研究[J].现代医学,2018,46(6):704-706. [19]Krause M,Preiss A,Müller G,et al.Intra-articular tibial plateau fracture characteristics according to the quot;Ten segment classification quot[J].Injury-international Journal of the Care of the Injured,2016,47(11):2551-2557.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01