[1]郑 刚,郭 旭,管玉华,等.脑室镜清除脓苔及术后脑室灌洗、引流在脑室感染中的应用[J].医学信息,2021,34(18):119-121,125.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.18.031]
 ZHENG Gang,GUO Xu,GUAN Yu-hua,et al.Application of Ventriculoscopy to Remove Pus Moss,Lavage and Drainage of Ventricle After Operation in Ventricular Infection[J].Medical Information,2021,34(18):119-121,125.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.18.031]
点击复制

脑室镜清除脓苔及术后脑室灌洗、引流在脑室感染中的应用()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年18期
页码:
119-121,125
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-09-18

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of Ventriculoscopy to Remove Pus Moss,Lavage and Drainage of Ventricle After Operation in Ventricular Infection
文章编号:
1006-1959(2021)18-0119-04
作者:
郑 刚郭 旭管玉华姜 莱周 健陈少军
三峡大学人民医院神经外科,湖北 宜昌 443000
Author(s):
ZHENG GangGUO XuGUAN Yu-huaJIANG LaiZHOU JianCHEN Shao-jun
Department of Neurosurgery,People’s Hospital of Three Gorges University,Yichang 443000,Hubei,China
关键词:
脑室镜脑室灌洗脑室外引流脑室感染
Keywords:
VentriculoscopyVentricle lavageVentricular drainageVentricular infection
分类号:
R651.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.18.031
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨脑室镜清除脑室内脓苔及术后脑室灌洗、持续引流在脑室感染中的疗效。方法 选取2016年1月-2019年12月三峡大学人民医院收治的脑室感染患者60例,按照不同手术方式分为脑室镜组和单纯脑室外引流组,各30例。单纯脑室外引流组采用单纯脑室外引流治疗方案,脑室镜组采用脑室镜下清除脑室内脓苔及术后持续脑室灌洗、引流治疗方案,比较两组治疗效果、临床指标(退热时间、脑室外引流时间、住院费用、住院时间)、脑脊液及血糖、血WBC水平、感染相关细胞因子水平(C反应蛋白、降钙素原、一氧化氮)。结果 脑室镜组治疗有效率为86.66%,高于单纯脑室外引流组的50.00%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);脑室镜组退热时间、脑室外引流时间、住院费用、住院时间均优于单纯脑室外引流组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);脑室镜组脑脊液乳酸、血糖水平、脑脊液WBC、血WBC低于单纯脑室外引流组,脑脊液糖水平高于单纯脑室外引流组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);脑室镜组脑脊液和血清C反应蛋白、降钙素原、一氧化氮均低于单纯脑室外引流组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 脑室镜清除脓苔及术后脑室灌洗、引流可缩短脑室感染治疗疗程,减少脑室外引流时间,节约治疗费用,缩短住院天数,提高脑室感染的治愈率。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the effect of ventriculoscopy to remove pus coating in the ventricle, lavage and continuous drainage of the ventricle after operation in the treatment of ventricular infection.Methods A total of 60 patients with ventricle infection admitted to the First Hospital of YC from January 2016 to December 2019 were selected.According to different surgical methods, they were divided into ventriculoscopy group and ventricular drainage group alone, with 30 cases in each.The simple ventricular drainage group was treated with a simple ventricular drainage treatment plan, and the ventriculoscopy group was treated with ventricular endoscopy to remove ventricular pus moss and continuous ventricular lavage and drainage treatment plans. The treatment effects and clinical indicators (antipyretic time,extraventricular drainage time, hospitalization expenses, hospitalization time), cerebrospinal fluid and blood sugar, blood WBC level, infection-related cytokine levels (C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, nitric oxide).Results The effective rate of treatment in the ventriculoscopy group was 86.66%, which was higher than the 50.00% in the ventricular drainage group alone,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);Ventroscope group’s antipyretic time, ventricular drainage time, hospitalization cost, and hospitalization time were better than those of simple ventricular drainage group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);The cerebrospinal fluid lactic acid, blood sugar level, cerebrospinal fluid WBC, and blood WBC in the ventriculoscopy group were lower than those in the ventricular drainage group alone, and the cerebrospinal fluid glucose level was higher than that in the ventricular drainage group alone,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);The cerebrospinal fluid and serum C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and nitric oxide in the ventriculoscopy group were lower than those in the simple ventricular drainage group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Ventroscope removal of pus moss and postoperative ventricle lavage and drainage can shorten the treatment course of ventricular infection, reduce the time of ventricular drainage, save treatment costs, shorten the number of days in hospital, and improve the cure rate of ventricular infection.

参考文献/References:

[1]王硕,方华,徐建红.脑室镜下脑室内血肿清除术与骨瓣开颅手术治疗脑室内血肿的疗效比较[J].透析与人工器官,2019,30(1):44-45,50.[2]孙桂好,孙宏亮,王海鹏.血清与脑脊液中炎性因子检测对颅内感染早期诊断的临床意义[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2015,24(18):4665-4667. [3]李佳盛,肖友君,戴明湘.持续腰大池引流加脑室冲洗治疗脑室外引流术后并发感染的临床研究[J].医学信息,2015,28(2):275.[4]刘宏斌,周厚杰,吴涛,等.脑室外引流术后脑室感染治疗的疗效观察[J].吉林医学,2018,39(6):1144-1146.[5]沈旭明,邱玉发,唐冬梅,等.脑室出血行脑室外引流并发颅内感染相关因素分析[J].中华医学杂志,2015,95(42):3468-3469.[6]姜莱,赵东刚,韩晶,等.脑室外引流术后并发颅内感染的因素分析[J].中华神经外科杂志,2014,30(4):396-398.[7]熊方令,刘保华,蔡旺,等.脑室外引流相关脑室炎危险因素对比研究[J].中华神经外科杂志,2013,29(3):270-272. [8]Jamjoom AAB,Joannides AJ,Poon MT,et al.Prospective,multicentre study of ex-ternal ventricular drainage-related infections in the UK and Ireland[J].J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry,2018,89(2):120-126. [9]沈云龙,刘加令,漆松涛,等.脑室出血外引流术后继发颅 内感染危险因素分析[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2015,41(12):705-709. [10]Camacho EF,Boszezowski I,Basso M,et al.Infection rate and risk factors associated with infections related to external ventfieular drain[J].Infection,2011,39(1):47-51. [11]赵新亮,申长虹,甄自刚.神经外科术后颅内感染的临床研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2006,16(3):277-280.[12]郭见,黄国栋,纪涛,等.神经内镜在严重脑室感染并脑积水中的应用(附27例报道)[J].中华神经医学杂志,2016,15(7):727-732.[13]陈延,赵开胜,韦玮.脑室系统内引流与外引流的临床比较[J].世界临床医学,2017,11(22):1.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01