[1]刘长爱.不同方法检测女性生殖道病原微生物感染的临床价值[J].医学信息,2021,34(18):180-182.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.18.050]
 LIU Chang-ai.The Clinical Value of Different Methods for Detecting Pathogenic Microbial Infections in Female Reproductive Tract[J].Medical Information,2021,34(18):180-182.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.18.050]
点击复制

不同方法检测女性生殖道病原微生物感染的临床价值()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年18期
页码:
180-182
栏目:
诊疗技术
出版日期:
2021-09-18

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Clinical Value of Different Methods for Detecting Pathogenic Microbial Infections in Female Reproductive Tract
文章编号:
1006-1959(2021)18-0180-03
作者:
刘长爱
天津市东丽区东丽医院妇科,天津 300300
Author(s):
LIU Chang-ai
Department of Gynecology,Dongli Hospital,Tianjin 300300,China
关键词:
核酸恒温扩增检测法培养法乳胶法病原微生物感染
Keywords:
Nucleic acid constant temperature amplification detection methodCulture methodLatex methodPathogenic microorganism infection
分类号:
R711.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.18.050
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 分析不同方法检测女性生殖道病原微生物感染的临床价值。方法 选取我院2019年12月-2020年12月共200例疑似生殖道病原微生物感染女性作为研究组,另选取200例正常女性体检者作为对照组,以固体培养法为标准,分析核酸恒温扩增检测技术(SAT)与液体培养法或乳胶法检测生殖道病原微生物感染情况及其临床价值。结果 研究组检出阳性率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。SAT法检测UU阳性率与培养法比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),且以培养法为参考标准,SAT敏感度为94.00%,特异度为84.00%。乳胶法检测CT阳性率与SAT法比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),且以乳胶法为参考标准,SAT敏感度为100.00%,特异度为96.15%。结论 女性生殖道病原微生物感染中以UU最为常见,其次分别为CT、MG。目前临床中常用的SAT法、液体培养法、乳胶法在检测方面均有一定的应用价值,其中SAT法对病原微生物感染的检出率更高,可作为临床首选的检测方案之一。
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the clinical value of different methods for detecting pathogenic microbial infections in female reproductive tract.Methods A total of 200 women with suspected reproductive tract pathogenic microbial infections in our hospital from December 2019 to December 2020 were selected as the research group, and 200 normal females were selected as the control group.The solid culture method is used as the standard to analyze nucleic acid constant temperature amplification detection technology (SAT) and liquid culture method or latex method to detect the infection of reproductive tract pathogenic microorganisms and its clinical value.Results The positive rate of detection in the study group was higher than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the positive rate of UU detected by SAT method and culture method (P>0.05).And taking the culture method as the reference standard, the sensitivity of SAT was 94.00%, and the specificity was 84.00%. There was no statistically significant difference in the positive rate of CT detection by latex method and SAT method (P>0.05).And taking the latex method as the reference standard, the SAT sensitivity was 100.00%, and the specificity was 96.15%.Conclusion UU is the most common infection of female genital tract pathogenic microorganisms, followed by CT and MG respectively.The SAT method, liquid culture method, and latex method commonly used in clinical practice have certain application value in detection. Among them, the SAT method has a higher detection rate for pathogenic microbial infections, and can be used as one of the first clinical detection programs.

参考文献/References:

[1]徐洁玲,方运香,余锦燕.泌尿生殖道感染女性患者宫颈分泌物和白带常见病原微生物的感染情况及特点[J].中国当代医药,2018,25(9):120-122. [2]王素英.5848例液基细胞学对女性下生殖道病原微生物感染的诊断分析[J].医学理论与实践,2016,29(5):672-673.[3]程莲花,杨秀贤.女性生殖道病原微生物检测分析[J].临床医学研究与实践,2017,2(19):123-124. [4]任亚青.显微镜在妇科泌尿生殖道病原微生物检测中诊断与应用[J].现代医用影像学,2019,28(1):172-173,195.[5]唐玉芳,杨靖,李世林.867例妇科门诊女性生殖道分泌物病原菌分离鉴定及耐药情况[J].安徽医药,2019,23(2):300-303. [6]周燕,位争伟,何莹莹,等.泌尿生殖道微生物感染检测与药敏结果分析[J].临床合理用药杂志,2020,13(8):169-170. [7]吴小春,唐丽娟.妊娠晚期孕妇生殖道感染病原微生物培养状况及妊娠结局分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2019,34(20):4753-4756. [8]李桂玲,孙爽,董惠杰.长春汽开区女性下生殖道致病微生物分析[J].中国卫生产业,2017,14(4):46-47. [9]张甜,杨春,纪春花,等.孕妇B族链球菌感染调查及其对生殖道微生物水平与妊娠结局的影响[J].中国病原生物学杂志,2019,14(8):959-961. [10]邱曙光,王志伟.300例支原体性阴道炎合并病原微生物感染分析[J].中国医药科学,2019,9(20):174-177. [11]李康怡.微生物鉴定仪检测妊娠晚期孕妇生殖道B族链球菌感染率及阴道微生物对感染影响[J].中国医疗器械信息,2019,25(12):55-56. [12]吴舒,李慧.某全自动微生物鉴定药敏分析仪对病原菌的鉴定能力及临床价值[J].检验医学与临床,2019,16(23):3530-3533. [13]马淑云,闫坤,周藤,等.1000例妇产科患者HPV筛查结果及相关微生物检测分析[J].中国病原生物学杂志,2019,14(1):92-95.[14]王晓东,王然,李凤焕,等.实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应联合检测6种性病病原微生物的研究[J].国际检验医学杂志,2016,37(20):2919-2921. [15]韩慕天,程洪波,王家雄,等.不孕女性生殖道UU,CT,NG和MG感染状况分析及不同检测方法结果比较[J].现代检验医学杂志,2018,33(1):137-140. [16]王达.2100例女性泌尿生殖道感染的病原学检测及耐药性分析[J].吉林医学,2020,41(1):186-187.[17]陈燕明.解脲支原体、沙眼衣原体及淋球菌联合检测在女性泌尿生殖道感染诊断中的价值[J].中国医药指南,2020,18(22):111-113.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01