[1]贾振杰.麦默通微创旋切手术与常规乳腺肿物切除术治疗良性乳腺肿物的疗效比较[J].医学信息,2021,34(20):132-134.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.20.034]
　JIA Zhen-jie.Efficacy Comparison of Mammotome Minimally Invasive Surgery and Conventional BreastTumor Resection in the Treatment of Benign Breast Tumor[J].Medical Information,2021,34(20):132-134.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.20.034]
点击复制

麦默通微创旋切手术与常规乳腺肿物切除术治疗良性乳腺肿物的疗效比较()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年20期
页码:
132-134
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Efficacy Comparison of Mammotome Minimally Invasive Surgery and Conventional BreastTumor Resection in the Treatment of Benign Breast Tumor
文章编号:
1006-1959（2021）20-0132-03
作者:
贾振杰
天津市黄河医院外科，天津 300110
Author(s):
JIA Zhen-jie
Department of Surgery,Tianjin Huanghe Hospital,Tianjin 300110,China
关键词:
麦默通微创旋切术; 乳腺肿物切除术; 乳腺良性肿物
Keywords:
Mammotome minimally invasive surgery; Breast tumor resection; Benign breast tumor
分类号:
R737.9
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.20.034
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较麦默通微创旋切与常规乳腺肿物切除术治疗良性乳腺肿物的临床效果。方法 选取2017年12月-2020年12月在我院诊治的80例良性乳腺肿物患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组，各40例。对照组采用常规乳腺肿物切除术治疗，观察组采用麦默通微创旋切手术治疗，比较两组治疗优良率、手术指标、美观满意度、生活质量和不良反应发生率。结果 观察组治疗优良率为92.50%，高于对照组的80.00%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组手术时间、术中出血量、术后愈合时间、瘢痕长度均小于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组美观满意度为97.50%，高于对照组的82.50%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；两组术后生活质量评分均高于术前，且观察组高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组并发症发生率为5.00%，低于对照组的17.50%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 麦默通微创旋切手术治疗良性乳腺肿物效果优于常规乳腺肿物切除术，可提高治疗总优良率，缩短手术时间，减少术中出血量，减小瘢痕长度，提高美观满意度和生活质量，且不良反应发生率少，具有良好的临床应用有效性和安全性。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the effect of mammotome minimally invasive surgery and conventional breast tumor resection in the treatment of benign breast tumor.Methods A total of 80 patients with benign breast tumors who were treated in our hospital from December 2017 to December 2020 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 40 cases in each group. The control group was treated with conventional breast tumor resection, and the observation group was treated with mammotome minimally invasive surgery. The excellent and good rate of treatment, surgical indicators, aesthetic satisfaction, quality of life and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results The excellent and good rate of treatment in the observation group was 92.50%, which was higher than 80.00% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05); the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative healing time and scar length of the observation group were less than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05); the aesthetic satisfaction of the observation group was 97.50%, which was higher than 82.50% of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05); the postoperative quality of life scores of the two groups were higher than those before operation, and the observation group was higher than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05); the incidence of complications in the observation group was 5.00%, which was lower than 17.50% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).Conclusion The effect of mammotome minimally invasive surgery is better than that of conventional breast tumor resection in the treatment of benign breast tumor, which can increase the total excellent and good rate of treatment, shorten the operation time, reduce the amount of bleeding during operation and reduce the length of scar, improve the satisfaction of beauty and quality of life, and the incidence of adverse reactions are less, with good clinical application effectiveness and safety.

参考文献/References:

[1]杨梅,高海燕,张晓兰.麦默通微创旋切手术与常规乳腺肿物切除术治疗良性乳腺肿物的疗效比较[J].实用临床医药杂志,2017,21(21):107-108.[2]姚慧韬,范庆浩,赵涵.乳腺良性肿瘤应用单人操作麦默通旋切系统治疗疗效分析[J].中华内分泌外科杂志,2017,11(2):127-130.[3]秦艳,周东华,朱婧.44例乳腺肿物麦默通微创旋切术后的病理结果[J].临床与病理杂志,2019,39(1):39-43.[4]李亚玲,朱铖.ECMR四步法降低麦默通乳腺良性肿瘤切除的残留率[J].中华普通外科杂志,2017,32(6):526-527.[5]李勇,贾晓斌.超声引导下麦默通旋切系统在乳腺纤维腺瘤治疗中的价值[J].中国妇幼保健,2017,32(16):3994-3996.[6]那将超,狄长安,殷咏梅.麦默通微创旋切术与传统手术治疗乳腺肿块效果对比分析[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2015,14(6):435-438.[7]邵超,张晶晶,凌飞海,等.经乳晕切口治疗乳腺良性疾病中麦默通微创旋切系统与传统手术的临床效果对比[J].实用医学杂志,2015,31(7):1142-1144.[8]齐久梅,王钢乐,唐欣,等.麦默通微创旋切术与传统切开手术在乳腺肿物治疗中的对比研究[J].中国医学装备,2015,12(9):86-89.[9]王超,张乘,冯海湛,等.麦默通微创旋切术加置引流对乳腺良性肿物患者术后恢复与并发症的影响[J].实用医学杂志,2018,34(11):1881-1884,1888.[10]程少先,徐文礼,艾瑞华.超声引导麦默通乳腺肿物切除术的并发症及防治[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2017,20(9):712-714.[11]李建,樊华,贺晓斌,等.超声引导麦默通乳腺术治疗良性肿瘤的疗效及激素水平观察[J].实用癌症杂志,2017,32(10):1628-1630.[12]倪道勇,朱建东,卓文方.超声引导下麦默通微创旋切手术治疗乳腺良性肿块的效果观察[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2018,25(S1):55,57.[13]林俊青,高峰,冯艳玉,等.麦默通微创旋切术与传统手术治疗乳腺良性肿块的对比研究[J].国际外科学杂志,2017,44(3):171-175.[14]廖桦,方志红,陈龙林.麦默通微创旋切系统与传统手术治疗乳腺良性病变的对比分析[J].中国医药科学,2019,9(11):211-213,247.[15]王蓉,郑媛,钱崇崴,等.麦默通旋切术治疗乳腺导管内乳头状瘤疗效观察[J].医学临床研究,2018,35(9):1844-1845.[16]林菊丽,朱瞻琳,毛贺辉,等.麦默通微创术治疗较大乳腺肿物的效果及并发症分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2018,33(9):228-231.[17]宋先旭,李宏海,吴妍.麦默通旋切手术在良性乳腺肿物中的作用[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2018,21(3):204.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01