[1]王彩霞.无痛内镜下高频电和微波切除胃十二指肠息肉的疗效观察[J].医学信息,2021,34(22):75-77.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.22.022]
　WANG Cai-xia.Observation on the Efficacy of High-frequency Electric and Microwave Resection of Gastroduodenal Polyps Under Painless Endoscopy[J].Medical Information,2021,34(22):75-77.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.22.022]
点击复制

无痛内镜下高频电和微波切除胃十二指肠息肉的疗效观察()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年22期
页码:
75-77
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2021-11-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Observation on the Efficacy of High-frequency Electric and Microwave Resection of Gastroduodenal Polyps Under Painless Endoscopy
文章编号:
1006-1959（2021）22-0075-03
作者:
王彩霞
（天津市武清区中医院内镜室，天津 301700）
Author(s):
WANG Cai-xia
(Endoscopy Room,Wuqing District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Tianjin 301700,China)
关键词:
无痛内镜; 高频电波; 微波; 胃十二指肠息肉
Keywords:
Painless endoscopy; High frequency radio; Microwave; Gastroduodenal polyps
分类号:
R656.6
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.22.022
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 观察无痛内镜下高频电和微波切除胃十二指肠息肉的临床疗效。方法 选取2019年10月-2020年10月在我院诊治的92例胃十二指肠息肉患者作为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组，各46例。对照组采用无痛内镜下微波切除术治疗，观察组采用无痛内镜下高频电和微波切除治疗，比较两组一次性切除率、手术指标、并发症发生率、生活质量评分及复发率。结果 观察组一次性切除率高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组手术时间、术中出血量均小于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；两组术后疼痛评分比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；观察组并发症发生率低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组生活质量各维度评分均高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；随访1年，观察组复发率低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 无痛内镜下高频电和微波切除胃十二指肠息肉效果确切，可提高一次性切除率，降低并发症发生率，提高患者的生活质量，降低复发率，确保远期疗效，值得临床应用。
Abstract:
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of high-frequency electric and microwave resection of gastroduodenal polyps under painless endoscopy.Methods A total of 92 patients with gastroduodenal polyps treated in our hospital from October 2019 to October 2020 were selected and randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 46 cases in each group. The control group was treated with painless endoscopic microwave resection, and the observation group was treated with painless endoscopic high-frequency electrical resection and microwave resection. The primary resection rate, surgical index, complication rate, quality of life score and recurrence rate were compared between the two groups.Results The primary resection rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The operation time and intraoperative blood loss of the observation group were less than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in postoperative pain score between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The scores of each dimension of quality of life in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). After 1 year of follow-up, the recurrence rate of the observation group was lower than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion High frequency electric and microwave endoscopic resection of gastroduodenal polyps is effective, which can improve the rate of primary resection, reduce the incidence of complications, improve the quality of life of patients, reduce the recurrence rate, and ensure long-term curative effect. It is worthy of clinical application.

参考文献/References:

[1]李继赋.无痛胃镜下高频电凝切除术治疗胃息肉的效果分析[J].河南医学研究,2018,27(3):454-455．[2]吴会芳,胡桂明,赵建波,等.十二指肠球部胃黏膜异位临床病理分析[J].胃肠病学和肝病学杂志,2018,27(5):54-56.[3]黄波,赵川,杨明.腹腔镜手术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔的疗效与安全性评价[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2015,20(3):245-246．[4]王祥耀,曾艳,梁浩.胃十二指肠神经内分泌瘤的诊治及预后分析[J].解放军医学杂志,2016,41(3):233-237．[5]戴欢.无痛胃镜下高频电凝切除术治闻胃息肉的安全性及疗效分析[J].医学理论与实践,2017,30(2):225-226．[6]孔凡荣.无痛内镜下高频电和微波切除胃十二指肠息肉患者的临床疗效观察[J].中国民康医学,2016,28(18):21-23．[7]王兰兰,闵敏,王桂良,等.以胃十二指肠多发息肉为表现的髓外浆细胞瘤一例[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2016,33(2):123-124．[8]莫海云,申古修,刘一武,等.口服胃肠超声造影剂与胃镜对儿童胃十二指肠疾病诊断价值的比较[J].中国医学创新,2015,12(15):58-60．[9]温志辉.无痛胃镜下高频电凝切除胃息肉的疗效[J].中国当代医药,2018,25(14):45-47.[10]任伟民,张友元,田培营,等.老年患者十二指肠息肉样病变的内镜形态及组织病理学分析[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2015,32(9):628-630.[11]高鹤,来文辉,张学丛,等．胆汁反流与贲门、胃和十二指肠息肉的关系[J].中华消化杂志,2017,37(1):49-51．[12]苏正虹.无痛肠镜下行肠息肉高频电凝切除术40 例临床疗效观察[J].实用中西医结合临床,2015,15(8):50-51．[13]卢晨霞,施正君,王雪明.胃肠镜下消化道息肉高频电切联合氩离子凝固术应用疗效及安全性观察[J].中国医疗设备,2018,33(5):55-57,65．[14]颜红梅,李荣海,美常安.胃增生性息肉和胃底腺息肉临床特征对比分析[J].临床医学,2018,38(2):37-38．[15]韦舒静．内镜下高频电切与微波治疗胃息肉186 例临床分析[J].临床医学研究与实践,2017,2(24):71-73．[16]孙华波.内镜下微波灼除术和高频电切术治疗消化道息肉效果比较[J].山东医药,2015,55(45):57-59.[17]孙丽丽,张健,何桦,等.胃十二指肠息肉经无痛胃镜下高频电联合微波切除的临床效果观察[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2019,24(9):1028-1031.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘小娟.大剂量奥美拉唑治疗消化性溃疡出血的有效性与安全性[J].医学信息,2020,33(17):143.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.17.041]
　LIU Xiao-juan.Efficacy and Safety of High-dose Omeprazole in the Treatment of Peptic Ulcer Bleeding[J].Medical Information,2020,33(22):143.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.17.041]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01