[1]钟伟博,杨 桥.硬膜外腔注射不同剂量盐酸氢吗啡酮对子宫切除术后疼痛及应激反应的影响[J].医学信息,2021,34(24):135-137.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.24.034]
　ZHONG Wei-bo,YANG Qiao.Effects of Epidural Injection of Different Doses of Hydromorphone Hydrochloride on Pain and Stress Response After Hysterectomy[J].Medical Information,2021,34(24):135-137.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.24.034]
点击复制

硬膜外腔注射不同剂量盐酸氢吗啡酮对子宫切除术后疼痛及应激反应的影响()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年24期
页码:
135-137
栏目:
药物与临床
出版日期:
2021-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of Epidural Injection of Different Doses of Hydromorphone Hydrochloride on Pain and Stress Response After Hysterectomy
文章编号:
1006-1959（2021）24-0135-03
作者:
钟伟博; 杨 桥
（1.赣南医学院，江西 赣州 341000；2.赣州市人民医院麻醉科，江西 赣州 341000）
Author(s):
ZHONG Wei-bo; YANG Qiao
(1.Gannan Medical University,Ganzhou 341000,Jiangxi,China;2.Department of Anesthesiology,Ganzhou People’s Hospital,Ganzhou 341000,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
硬膜外腔注射; 盐酸氢吗啡酮; 子宫切除术; 应激反应
Keywords:
Epidural injection; Hydromorphone hydrochloride; Hysterectomy; Stress response
分类号:
R971.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.24.034
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 观察硬膜外腔注射不同剂量盐酸氢吗啡酮对子宫切除术后疼痛及应激反应的影响。方法 选取2020年1月-2021年8月我院收治的子宫切除术患者92例，均应用腰-硬联合麻醉下，随机分为对照组和观察组，每组46例。对照组硬膜外腔注射盐酸氢吗啡酮0.6 mg与7.5 mg罗哌卡因混合液，观察组硬膜外腔注射盐酸氢吗啡酮0.4 mg与7.5 mg罗哌卡因混合液。比较两组患者不同时间点疼痛（VAS）评分、镇静评分、心率（HR）、有创平均动脉压（MAP）、血氧饱和度（SpO2）变化情况以及不良反应情况。结果 术后6 h观察组VAS评分大于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），术后12 h两组VAS评分均大于术后6 h（P＜0.05），但差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；术后6、12 h两组镇静评分比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；术后6、12 h两组HR、MAP均大于麻醉前，但观察组小于对照组（P＜0.05），两组不同时间点SpO2比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；观察组不良反应发生率为4.35%，低于对照组的13.04%（P＜0.05）。结论 硬膜外腔注射不同剂量盐酸氢吗啡酮对子宫切除术后疼痛均有一定的影响，但是0.4 mg基本可实现与0.6 mg相同的镇痛和镇静效果，且对HR、MAP、SpO2影响较小，可一定程度减轻应激反应，同时临床不良反应小，具有相对更优的安全性。
Abstract:
Objective To observe the effect of epidural injection of different doses of hydromorphone hydrochloride on pain and stress response after hysterectomy.Methods A total of 92 patients with hysterectomy admitted to our hospital from January 2020 to August 2021 were selected and randomly divided into control group and observation group under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, with 46 cases in each group. The control group received epidural injection of hydromorphone hydrochloride 0.6 mg and 7.5 mg ropivacaine mixture, and the observation group received epidural injection of hydromorphone hydrochloride 0.4 mg and 7.5 mg ropivacaine mixture. The pain (VAS) score, sedation score, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), oxygen saturation (SpO2) and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results The VAS score at 6 h after operation in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); the VAS scores at 12 h after operation in both groups were higher than those at 6 h after operation, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in sedation score at 6 and 12 h after operation between the two groups (P>0.05). At 6 and 12 h after operation, HR and MAP in the two groups were higher than those before anesthesia, but those in the observation group were lower than the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in SpO2 at different time points between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 4.35%, which was lower than 13.04% in the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion Epidural injection of different doses of hydromorphone hydrochloride has a certain effect on postoperative pain after hysterectomy, but 0.4 mg can basically achieve the same analgesic and sedative effects as 0.6 mg, and has little effect on HR, MAP and SpO2, which can reduce the stress response to a certain extent. At the same time, the clinical adverse reactions are small, and it has relatively better safety.

参考文献/References:

[1]郑华,陈超,郭珊娜,等.氢吗啡酮在骨科术后镇痛中应用的有效性与安全性[J].临床外科杂志,2016,24(1):68-70.[2]Sotiropoulos GC,Machairas N,Stratigopoulou P,et al.Laparo-scopic liver resection for malignancy in high-risk surgical patients according to ASA classification[J].J BUON,2016,21(6):1398-1402.[3]张安传,尹鸿.硬膜外复合全身麻醉与静吸复合全身麻醉对子宫切除术麻醉效果比较[J].医学综述,2016,22(16):3311-3312.[4]齐素敏,毛中鹏,潘鸿.老年腹腔镜下全子宫切除术采用不同麻醉方法的疗效对比[J].湖南师范大学学报:医学版,2016,13(5):42-44.[5]张海亮,郝静静,白延斌,等.静吸复合与全凭静脉麻醉在妇科腹腔镜手术中的临床应用研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,48(8):1038-1041.[6]贾丽玲,杨建新,李雁楠,等.依托咪酯复合瑞芬太尼对妇科腹腔镜手术麻醉效果及血流动力学的影响[J].中国基层医药,2020,27(1):59-63.[7]王晓光,李戈辉,齐晓非,等.不同麻醉方式对腹腔镜子宫切除术患者炎症反应及氧化应激反应的影响[J].海南医学院学报,2016,22(13):1446-1449.[8]陈宏福,张瑞东,高宝斌.全麻复合硬膜外麻醉在妇科腹腔镜手术中的效果及对血流动力学的影响[J].浙江医学,2016,38(16):1351-1353.[9]蔡哲,曾祥灵,顾祥阳,等.氢吗啡酮替代吗啡改善术后镇痛的效能[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2016,37(4):579-584.[10]雷波,王雷,贺淑君,等.盐酸氢吗啡酮在瘢痕子宫剖宫产术后镇痛的临床研究[J].中日友好医院学报,2016,30(3):150-152.[11]沈洪波,苗国庆,吕忠杰.盐酸氢吗啡酮不同模式术后镇痛的临床研究[J].世界临床医学,2016,10(2):106,119.[12]李丹,陈琦,康宇,等.硬膜外腔注射氢吗啡酮在剖宫产术后镇痛的临床观察[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2016,37(4):310-312.[13]蒋艳东,赵素敏.瑞芬太尼联合丙泊酚麻醉对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者应激反应,血气指标的影响[J].海南医学院学报,2016,22(7):677-679.[14]李艳华,刘容.全麻复合硬膜外麻醉在高血压患者腹腔镜全子宫切除术中的麻醉效果[J].实用临床医药杂志,2016,20(3):59-61.[15]陈吕富,余云明,高德胜,等.不同麻醉药物配伍对行腹腔镜下肿瘤切除手术的老年患者血流动力学及术后认知功能的影响[J].实用癌症杂志,2017,32(2):320-323.[16]陈宏福,张瑞东,高宝斌.全麻复合硬膜外麻醉在妇科腹腔镜手术中的效果及对血流动力学的影响[J].浙江医学,2016,38(16):1351-1353.[17]杜顺颜,梁肖霞,周子樱,等.七氟醚复合瑞芬太尼麻醉对腹腔镜子宫切除术患者应激反应的影响[J].北方药学,2017,14(12):78.[18]毛毛,王朝晖,冯善武,等.硬膜外注射吗啡用于缓解侧切产妇产后会阴部疼痛的效果[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2017,33(9):848-851.[19]占乐云,夏中元,张蕾,等.盐酸吗啡和盐酸氢吗啡酮用于前列腺电切术后硬膜外镇痛效果的比较[J].医药导报,2016,35(8):858-860.[20]李丹,陈琦,康宇,等.硬膜外腔注射氢吗啡酮在剖宫产术后镇痛的临床观察[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2016,37(4):310-312.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01