[1]穆红茹.电子阴道镜下定位活检在宫颈病变诊断中的应用价值[J].医学信息,2022,35(01):178-180.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.01.045]
　MU Hong-ru.Application Value of Localization Biopsy Under Electronic Colposcopy in Diagnosis of Cervical Lesions[J].Medical Information,2022,35(01):178-180.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.01.045]
点击复制

电子阴道镜下定位活检在宫颈病变诊断中的应用价值()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2022年01期
页码:
178-180
栏目:
诊疗技术
出版日期:
2022-01-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application Value of Localization Biopsy Under Electronic Colposcopy in Diagnosis of Cervical Lesions
文章编号:
1006-1959（2022）01-0178-03
作者:
穆红茹
（天津市蓟州区人民医院妇科，天津 301900）
Author(s):
MU Hong-ru
(Department of Gynecology,Tianjin Jizhou District People’s Hospital,Tianjin 301900,China)
关键词:
电子阴道镜; 定位活检; 宫颈病变; 慢性宫颈炎; 宫颈癌前病变; 宫颈癌
Keywords:
Electronic colposcopy; Location biopsy; Cervical lesions; Chronic cervicitis; Cervical precancerous lesions; Cervical cancer
分类号:
R446
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.01.045
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究电子阴道镜下定位活检在宫颈病变诊断中的应用价值。方法 选取2020年3月-2021年3月我院接诊的64例宫颈病变患者为研究对象，均进行电子阴道镜下定位活检及组织病理学检查，比较病理学诊断与电子阴道镜下定位活检诊断的准确率、不同病理类型阴道镜图像表现、宫颈上皮内瘤变（CIN）分级的检出率。结果 阴道镜下定位活检对慢性宫颈炎、宫颈癌前病变、宫颈癌的检出率及诊断准确率与组织病理学诊断结果比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；阴道镜下异常图像主要表现为发生不同程度的醋酸白色上皮，CIN主要表现为醋酸白上皮、镶嵌与点状血管，伴随宫颈病变程度的严重化，继而发生以白斑加镶嵌二联征、白色上皮加异型血管加镶嵌三联征，宫颈癌主要表现为四联征；阴道镜下定位活检CIN1、CIN2、CIN3检出率与病理学检出率比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 电子阴道镜下定位活检诊断宫颈病变准确率高，可明确CIN分级，提供异常图像特点，为临床定位活检提供可靠的依据，具有较高的应用价值。
Abstract:
Objective To study the application value of localization biopsy under electronic colposcopy in the diagnosis of cervical lesions.Methods A total of 64 patients with cervical lesions admitted to our hospital from March 2020 to March 2021 were selected as the research objects. All patients underwent electronic colposcopy positioning biopsy and histopathological examination. The accuracy of pathological diagnosis and electronic colposcopy positioning biopsy diagnosis, colposcopy image performance of different pathological types, and the detection rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade were compared.Results There was no significant difference in the detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of colposcopic biopsy for chronic cervicitis, cervical precancerous lesions and cervical cancer compared with histopathological diagnosis (P>0.05). The abnormal images under colposcopy were mainly manifested as different degrees of acetic acid white epithelium. CIN was mainly manifested as acetic acid white epithelium, mosaic and punctate blood vessels, accompanied by the severity of cervical lesions, followed by white spots and mosaic binary sign, white epithelium and atypical blood vessels and mosaic triple sign, and cervical cancer was mainly manifested as quadruple sign. There was no significant difference in the detection rates of CIN1, CIN2, and CIN3 between colposcopic biopsy and pathological biopsy (P>0.05).Conclusion The accuracy of localization biopsy under electronic colposcopy in the diagnosis of cervical lesions is high, which can clarify the CIN grade, provide abnormal image characteristics, provide reliable basis for clinical localization biopsy, and has high clinical application value.

参考文献/References:

[1]贺琳.电子阴道镜诊断宫颈疾病231例临床分析[J].基层医学论坛,2016,20(10):1361-1362.[2]殷美玲.电子阴道镜下定位活检在诊断宫颈病变中的价值分析[J].检验医学与临床,2016,12(14):2093-2094.[3]刘蓓蓓,闫洪超.阴道镜下宫颈活检联合EGFR、P16、P53蛋白检测诊断宫颈病变价值[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2021,29(1):168-170,174.[4]Crawford NW,Hodgson K,Gold M,et al.Adverse events following HPV immunization in australia:establishment of a clinical network[J].Hum Vaccin Immunother,2016,12(10):2662-2665.[5]秦英明,张秀菊,王维,等.TCT、HPV-DNA联合阴道镜检查在宫颈病变诊断中的应用价值[J].中国性科学,2016,25(7):45-47.[6]周晓花,宋芳,吕讷男,等.HR-HPV阳性TCT阴性女性的宫颈上皮组织病理学结果分析[J].医学综述,2020,26(1):183-186,191. [7]雷冬梅,林艳丽,郭瑞霞,等.TCT、HPV E6/E7 mRNA与hTERC基因联合检测在宫颈癌筛查中的应用价值研究[J].现代妇产科进展,2020,29(5):349-352,359.[8]黄珊珊,徐凤娟,成雁,等.高危型HPV E6/E7 mRNA与HC2 HPV-DNA联合检测在宫颈病变筛查中价值[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2020,34(6):577-580.[9]Kostaras D,Karampli E,Athanasakis K.Vaccination against HPV virus: a systematic review of economic evaluation studies for developed countries[J].Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res,2019,19(2):147-158.[10]刘蓓蓓,朱彦玲,章文华,等.128 例阴道镜检查宫颈多点活检和宫颈管诊刮术诊断宫颈病变的临床价值[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2018,40(7):539-542. [11]颛佳,张岱,贾芃,等.子宫颈四象限随机活检与阴道镜下定位活检 HSIL+检出率比较[J].现代妇产科进展,2019,28(2):101-104,108. [12]龙梅雪.阴道镜检查对宫颈病变的诊断价值[D].青岛:青岛大学,2017.[13]Luyten A,Buttmann-Schweiger N,Hagemann I,et al.Utility and Reproducibility of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy Classification of Transformation Zones in Daily Practice: A Multicenter Study of the German Colposcopy Network[J].J Low Genit Tract Dis,2015,19(3):185-188.[14]张凌,杜辉,张薇,等.阴道镜下子宫颈多点活检及颈管内膜刮取术对高级别子宫颈病变的诊断价值[J].中华妇产科杂志,2015(4):263-267. [15]薛金枝.HPV及TCT检查联合阴道镜下活检筛查宫颈癌的临床价值[J].贵州医药,2018,42(4):486-487. [16]徐海洋,王爽,梁华茂,等.阴道镜下宫颈量化指标在宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变宫颈萎缩患者术式选择中的价值[J].中国微创外科杂志,2020,20(12):1073-1076.[17]吴凡,宋岩,曾辉英,等.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间肝胆系统恶性肿瘤的诊疗策略探讨[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2020,42(3):187-191.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01