[1]赵崇山,王宁方.脾脏硬度对初发骨髓增生异常综合征患者预后的影响[J].医学信息,2022,35(07):88-91.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.07.021]
 ZHAO Chong-shan,WANG Ning-fang.Effect of Spleen Stiffness Measurement on Prognosis of Patients with Primary Myelodysplastic Syndrome[J].Medical Information,2022,35(07):88-91.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.07.021]
点击复制

脾脏硬度对初发骨髓增生异常综合征患者预后的影响()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2022年07期
页码:
88-91
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2022-04-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Spleen Stiffness Measurement on Prognosis of Patients with Primary Myelodysplastic Syndrome
文章编号:
1006-1959(2022)07-0088-04
作者:
赵崇山王宁方
(河北中石油中心医院感染科1,血液科2,河北 廊坊 065000)
Author(s):
ZHAO Chong-shanWANG Ning-fang
(Department of Infection1,Department of Hematology2,Hebei Petro China Central Hospital,Langfang 065000,Hebei,China)
关键词:
脾脏硬度FibroScan骨髓增生异常综合征
Keywords:
Spleen stiffness measurementFibroScanMyelodysplastic syndrome
分类号:
R551.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.07.021
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨脾脏硬度(SSM)在骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者预后中的意义。方法 选取2016年2月-2020年3月在河北中石油中心医院就诊的40例初治MDS患者设为MDS组,同时选取18名健康志愿者设为对照组,分别进行SSM检测。比较两组SSM差异,进一步分析SSM与临床特征及预后的关系。结果 MDS组SSM为[34.53(19.11~55.20)]kPa,高于对照组的[13.51(8.32~26.53)]kPa,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);SSM<30 kPa及SSM≥30 kPa间ECOG评分、危险度分级、原始细胞比例、血小板计数、EPO比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);SSM<30 kPa及SSM≥30 kPa间年龄、CI、染色体核型、血红蛋白、铁蛋白比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);不同SSM、危险度分级、原始细胞比例、染色体核型间EFS、OS比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 SSM与危险度分级、染色体核型、原始细胞比例等有关,或可用来评估MDS患者预后。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the role of spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) in the prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).Methods From February 2016 to March 2020, 40 newly diagnosed MDS patients in Hebei Central Hospital of Petroleum were selected as the MDS group, and 18 healthy volunteers were selected as the control group. SSM tests were performed to compare the differences between the two groups, and further analyze the relationship between SSM and clinical characteristics and prognosis.Results The SSM of MDS group was[34.53(19.11-55.20)]kPa, which was higher than[13.51(8.32-26.53)]kPa of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There were significant differences in ECOG score, risk grade, proportion of primitive cells, platelet count and EPO between SSM<30 kPa and SSM≥30 kPa (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in age, CI, chromosome karyotype, hemoglobin and ferritin between SSM<30 kPa and SSM≥30 kPa (P>0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the comparison of EFS and OS among different SSMs, risk classification, proportion of primitive cells, and chromosome karyotypes (P<0.05).Conclusion SSM is related to risk classification, chromosome karyotype, proportion of primitive cells, or can be used to evaluate the prognosis of MDS patients.

参考文献/References:

[1]史仲珣,秦铁军,徐泽锋,等.平均红细胞体积≤100f1是骨髓原始细胞<5%骨髓增生异常综合征患者的独立预后因素[J].中华血液学杂志,2020,41(1):28-33.[2]Buechter M,Manka P,Theysohn JM,et al.Spleen stiffness is positively correlated with HVPG and decreasessignificantly after TIPS implantation[J].Dig Liver Dis,2018,50(1):54-60.[3]李琼,刘闪闪,徐丽红,等.肝、脾硬度预测食管胃底静脉曲张及出血风险[J].中国医学影像技术,2018,34(4):563-567.[4]Iurlo A,Cattaneo D,Giunta M,et al.Reply To: Assessment of Liver and Spleen Stiffness in Patients With Myelofibrosis Using FibroScan and Shear Wave Elastography[J].Ultrasound Q,2016,32(3):317.[5]武明莉,李琳.染色体异常核型八例[J].中华医学遗传学杂志,2020,37(8):906.[6]Choi SM,O’Malley DP.Diagnostically relevant updates to the 2017 WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms[J].Ann Diagn Pathol,2017,37(1):67-74.[7]Tag-Adeen M,Alsenbesy M,Ghweil AA,et al.Liver stiffness measurement and spleen diameter as predictors for the presence of esophageal varices in chronic hepatitis C patients[J].Medicine (Baltimore),2017,96(46):e8621.[8]Sharma P,Kirnake V,Tyagi P,et al.Spleen Stiffness in Patients With Cirrhosis in Predicting Esophageal Varices[J].Am J Gastroenterol,2013,108(7):1101-1107.[9]林欣,尚国臣,齐翠花,等.利用瞬时弹性成像技术对肝脏、脾脏硬度的测定及其与肝硬化食管静脉曲张程度的关系[J].中华消化杂志,2018,38(2):129-131.[10]Ravaioli F,Marasco G,Reggiani MB,et al.Spleen stiffness measurement: A useful prognostic tool in HCV patients treated with DAAs regimens[J].Digestive & Liver Disease,2017,49(1):e40-e41.[11]展世宏,成芳芳,缪洁,等.先天性白血病临床特征分析[J].临床儿科杂志,2019,37(3):170-172.[12]刘为易,全日城,赵攀,等.骨髓增生异常综合征患者基因突变情况分析[J].白血病·淋巴瘤,2018,27(8):449-452.[13]杨隽,蔡宇,姜杰玲,等.异基因造血干细胞移植治疗高龄髓系肿瘤30例临床分析[J].中华血液学杂志,2018,39(8):629-633.[14]叶芳,马东升,王洁,等.骨髓增生异常综合征转化为急性髓系白血病患者的临床研究[J].中国实验血液学杂志,2018,26(1):202-207.[15]Wang J,Wang Q,Zhang H,et al.Moderate to Severe Marrow Fibrosis As a More Advanced Risk Factor for MDS and MDS-AML Patients With Excess of Blasts Receiving Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation[J].Transplant Cell Ther,2021,27(8):666.e1-666.e9.[16]Yu Y,Zhang TT,Wang QR,et al.Counting bone marrow blasts as a percentage of nonerythroid cells improves the prognostic evaluation of MDS with erythroid predominance[J].American Journal of Hematology,2017,92(4):e55-e57.[17]Chan LSA,Gu LC,Leitch HA,et al.Intracellular ROS profile in hematopoietic progenitors of MDS patients: association with blast count and iron overload[J].Hematology,2021,26(1):88-95.[18]Zuanelli Brambilla C,Lobaugh SM,Ruiz JD,et al.Relapse after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation of Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome and the Importance of Second Cellular Therapy[J].Transplant Cell Ther,2021,27(9):771.e1-771.e10.[19]Fang H,Yabe M,Zhang X,et al.Myelodysplastic syndrome with t(6;9)(p22;q34.1)/DEK-NUP214 better classified as acute myeloid leukemia? A multicenter study of 107 cases[J].Mod Pathol,2021,34(6):1143-1152.[20]刘秋艳,王燕,龙珍珠玛,等.骨髓增生异常综合征转化为急性白血病的高危因素分析[J].临床血液学杂志,2017,30(7):524-526,531.[21]严雪芬,韦菊英,王敬瀚,等.298例骨髓增生异常综合征患者染色体核型与临床预后分析[J].中华血液学杂志,2015,36(4):297-301.[22]钱瑾,夏珺,谢新,等.伴21号染色体核型异常的骨髓增生异常综合征患者的临床特征[J].中国实验血液学杂志,2021,29(5):1528-1532.[23]吕晓东,李扬威,郭珍,等.骨髓增生异常综合征基因突变特征及突变负荷相关临床分析[J].中华医学杂志,2020,100(12):933-937. [24]Wu A,Gao P,Wu N,et al.Elevated mature monocytes in bone marrow accompanied with a higher IPSS-R score predicts a poor prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes[J].BMC Cancer,2021,21(1):546.

相似文献/References:

[1]赵崇山,王宁方,何文艳.脾脏硬度及细胞因子在原发性血小板增多症患者血栓预测中的价值[J].医学信息,2021,34(21):69.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.21.017]
 ZHAO Chong-shan,WANG Ning-fang,HE Wen-yan.The Value of Spleen Stiffness Measurement and Cytokines in Predicting Thrombosis in Patients with Essential Thrombocytosis[J].Medical Information,2021,34(07):69.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.21.017]
[2]赵崇山,王宁方.脾脏硬度联合流式细胞术在急性髓系白血病微小残留病监测中的意义[J].医学信息,2022,35(05):121.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.05.031]
 ZHAO Chong-shan,WANG Ning-fang.The Significance of Spleen Stiffness Measurement Combine with Flow Cytometry in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Minimal Residual Disease[J].Medical Information,2022,35(07):121.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.05.031]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01