[1]孙 睿.日常胎动记录图和评估脐带绕颈对胎儿宫内安危的价值研究[J].医学信息,2022,(09):151-153.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.09.038]
 SUN Rui.Study on the Value of Daily Fetal Movement Record and Evaluation of Umbilical Cord Around Neck on Fetal Safety in Uterus[J].Medical Information,2022,(09):151-153.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.09.038]
点击复制

日常胎动记录图和评估脐带绕颈对胎儿宫内安危的价值研究()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
期数:
2022年09期
页码:
151-153
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2022-05-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the Value of Daily Fetal Movement Record and Evaluation of Umbilical Cord Around Neck on Fetal Safety in Uterus
文章编号:
1006-1959(2022)09-0151-03
作者:
孙 睿
(天津市港口医院妇产科,天津 300456)
Author(s):
SUN Rui
(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Tianjin Port Hospital,Tianjin 300456,China)
关键词:
胎动记录图脐带绕颈胎儿宫内安危
Keywords:
Fetal movement recordUmbilical cord around neckFetusIntrauterine safety
分类号:
R714.43
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.09.038
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 分析日常胎动记录图和评估脐带绕颈对胎儿宫内安危的应用价值。方法 选取我院2019年12月-2020年12月共128例足月分娩孕妇作为研究对象,根据分娩结局分为宫内安全组(n=55)和宫内不安全组(n=73),分析日常胎动记录图和评估脐带绕颈对胎儿宫内安危的价值。结果 128例足月分娩孕妇入院后均接受自然分娩建议,分娩中转剖宫产46例,临产后选择剖宫产6例。两组S/D、脐带绕颈周数、FM、Fischer评分、分娩方式比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组年龄、AFI比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);多因素Logistic回归分析显示,FM异常、FM减少或消失以及剖宫产,均是影响脐带绕颈胎儿宫内安危的高危因素(P<0.05);日常胎动记录图预测灵敏度为87.27%,特异度为90.00%。结论 日常胎动记录图在评估脐带绕颈胎儿宫内安危中具有较高的应用价值,能够有效预测胎儿的状态,有利于指导临床采取针对性的分娩方式。
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the daily fetal movement records and evaluate the application value of the umbilical cord around neck on fetal safety in the uterus.Methods A total of 128 full-term pregnant women in our hospital from December 2019 to December 2020 were selected as the research objects. According to the delivery outcome, they were divided into an intrauterine safety group (n=55) and an intrauterine unsafe group (n=73). The daily fetal movement records and evaluate the value of the umbilical cord around neck on the fetal safety in the uterus were evaluated.Results A total of 128 cases of full-term delivery of pregnant women after admission were accepted natural childbirth Suggestions, 46 cases of delivery to cesarean section, 6 cases of cesarean section after labor. There were statistically significant differences in S/D, umbilical cord circumference, FM, Fischer score and delivery mode between the two groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in age and AFI between the two groups (P>0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that abnormality of FM, reduction or disappearance of FM, and cesarean section were all high-risk factors affecting the intrauterine safety of fetus with umbilical cord around neck (P<0.05). The prediction sensitivity and specificity of daily fetal movement record were 87.27% and 90.00%, respectively.Conclusion The daily fetal movement record has high application value in evaluating the intrauterine safety of the fetus with the umbilical cord around neck., which can effectively predict the state of the fetus and is helpful to guide the clinical adoption of targeted delivery methods.

参考文献/References:

[1]王雅丽,张丽娜,吴青青.多种胎儿宫内监测方法预测子痫前期新生儿不良结局的比较研究[J].临床超声医学杂志,2021,23(4):261-265.[2]李燕梅,蒋艳艳,张静宇,等.探讨妊娠晚期胎儿脐带绕颈使用彩超指导宫内松解的临床效果[J].国际医药卫生导报,2020,26(8):1076-1079.[3]Chen YH,Liu X,Xu CM,et al.Standardization of diagnosis for coiling of the umbilical cord around fetal neck by ultrasound[J].Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2019,147(1):96-101.[4]陈秋玲,高爽.胎心监护与脐动脉血流监测对胎儿窘迫的诊断价值[J].中国妇幼保健,2021,36(20):4867-4869.[5]张晓玲,和银侠,张红丽.风险管理在胎儿脐带绕颈产程护理过程中应用的可行性及有效性分析[J].贵州医药,2020,44(11):1830-1831.[6]叶爱梅,李子军,艾小玉.日常胎动记录图预测和评估脐带绕颈胎儿宫内安危的价值研究[J].中国全科医学,2021,24(6):690-695.[7]王立娟,勇强,包晶晶,等.胎儿脐带绕颈程度与胎儿左心室Tei指数及脐动脉S/D值相关性研究[J].中国超声医学杂志,2019,35(5):447-450.[8]Meganathan HS,Rajeshwaran R,Bhuvana S.MRI findings in a fetus with a tight cord around the neck[J].Neurol India,2017,65(5):1130-1131.[9]程昇,沈晓燕.胎儿动脉指数与脐带绕颈压迹深度的相关性[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2019,30(10):1201-1204.[10]李滟,佘铜生,陈珉.CDFI评估脐带绕颈胎儿宫内缺氧及围产结局的临床价值[J].西南国防医药,2019,29(1):41-43.[11]王冰,王敬民,柳雨辰,等.脐带过度扭转致母体D-二聚体异常升高、胎儿生长受限、新生儿红细胞增多症1例[J].大连医科大学学报,2021,43(2):187-190.[12]Nandhini S,Anuradha CR,Renuka S,et al.Incidence of umbilical cord around the neck and its eects on mode of delivery and fetal outcome at tertiary care hospital[J].Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol,2021,10(2):1-4.[13]陈路萍,张永清,张佳玲,等.胎动异常患者发生不良预后结局的相关因素分析[J].浙江医学,2019,41(9):912-915,923.[14]刘璇芝,姚怀齐,郑宝群,等.灰阶B超与彩色多普勒超声产前诊断胎儿脐带绕颈的准确性及其与围生儿预后的关系[J].广东医学,2015,36(15):2403-2406.[15]李燕丽.超声监测脐带缠绕胎儿脐动脉和大脑中动脉血流在预测胎儿窘迫中的应用价值[J].中国妇幼保健,2021,36(5):1202-1203.[16]Hemmanur SR,Koteswaramma B,Nagashree V.A novel daily fetal movement monitoring chart to detect the fetus at risk for IUD- A case-control study[J].Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,2019,36(3):398-402.[17]张艳,张之霞.非产时完整母胎动态心电图监测对胎儿窘迫的预测价值[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2020,28(10):1591-1595,1723.[18]姚彩云,刘会琴,张海荣.胎盘弹性平均值与脐带动脉S/D对胎儿预后不良的预测及其相关性分析[J].贵州医药,2020,44(3):432-434.[19]杨小娟,高翠萍.胎儿脐绕颈218例分娩方式及围产儿结局分析[J].陕西医学杂志,2013,42(6):669-670.[20]Dhungana PR,Adhikari R,Pageni PR,et al.Decreased fetal movement:Is it an alarm to Obstetrician and Pregnant Lady?[J].Medical Journal of Pokhara Academy of Health Sciences,2018,1(2):92-97.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01