[1]胡 愔,盛晓滨,高慧莉.妊娠合并帆状胎盘对胎儿结局影响分析[J].医学信息,2022,35(10):146-148.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.10.036]
 HU Yin,SHENG Xiao-bin,GAO Hui-li.Analysis of the Effect of Pregnancy with Velamentous Placenta on Fetal Outcome[J].Medical Information,2022,35(10):146-148.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.10.036]
点击复制

妊娠合并帆状胎盘对胎儿结局影响分析()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2022年10期
页码:
146-148
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2022-05-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of the Effect of Pregnancy with Velamentous Placenta on Fetal Outcome
文章编号:
1006-1959(2022)10-0146-03
作者:
胡 愔盛晓滨高慧莉
(首都医科大学石景山教学医院北京市石景山医院妇产科,北京 100043)
Author(s):
HU YinSHENG Xiao-binGAO Hui-li
(Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics,Shijingshan Teaching Hospital of Capital Medical University Beijing Shijingshan Hospital,Beijing 100043,China)
关键词:
妊娠帆状胎盘胎儿结局胎儿宫内窘迫新生儿窒息
Keywords:
PregnancyVelamentous placentaFetal outcomeFetal intrauterine distressNeonatal asphyxia
分类号:
R714.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.10.036
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究妊娠合并帆状胎盘对胎儿结局的影响。方法 选取2018年1月-2021年6月我院接诊的93例妊娠合并帆状胎盘产妇为观察组,另选取同期我院接诊的93例未合并帆状胎盘产妇为对照组,比较两组分娩结局、早产发生率、胎儿宫内窘迫发生率、羊水质量、新生儿窒息发生率和Apgar评分、产后感染和出血发生率。结果 观察组阴道自然分娩率低于对照组,剖宫产率、产钳助产率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组早产、胎儿宫内窘迫发生率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组羊水轻度污染率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);中度、重度污染率与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组新生儿窒息率高于对照组,新生儿Apgar评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组产后感染和出血发生率高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 妊娠合并帆状胎盘会增加剖宫产发生率,影响胎儿宫内安全,增加早产、胎儿宫内窘迫发生率、羊水轻度污染率以及新生儿窒息率和分娩质量,且会增加产妇产后并发症。临床应给予及时诊断、加强监测,以提高胎儿分娩结局。
Abstract:
Objective To study the effect of pregnancy with velamentous placenta on fetal outcome.Methods A total of 93 pregnant women with velamentous placenta admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to June 2021 were selected as the observation group, and 93 pregnant women without velamentous placenta admitted to our hospital during the same period were selected as the control group. The delivery outcome, the incidence of premature delivery, the incidence of fetal distress, the quality of amniotic fluid, the incidence of neonatal asphyxia and Apgar score, and the incidence of postpartum infection and bleeding were compared between the two groups.Results The vaginal natural delivery rate of the observation group was lower than that of the control group, and the cesarean section rate and forceps midwifery rate were higher than those of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of premature delivery and fetal intrauterine distress in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The mild pollution rate of amniotic fluid in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the moderate and severe pollution rates between the observation group and the control group (P>0.05). The neonatal asphyxia rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the neonatal Apgar score was lower than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of postpartum infection and bleeding in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion Pregnancy with velamentous placenta can increase the incidence of cesarean section, affect fetal intrauterine safety, increase the incidence of premature delivery, fetal distress, mild amniotic fluid pollution, neonatal asphyxia rate and delivery quality, and increase maternal postpartum complications. Clinically, timely diagnosis and monitoring should be given to improve the outcome of fetal childbirth.

参考文献/References:

[1]谢幸,孔北华,段涛.妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:161.[2]Ebbing C,Johnsen SL,Albrechtsen S,et al.Velamentous or marginal cord insertion and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth,prelabor rupture of the membranes,and anomalous cord length,a population-based study[J].Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2017,96(1):78-85.[3]朱成德.超声检查对胎儿脐带血管前置的诊断价值[J].分子影像学杂志,2018,41(2):178-180.[4]Costa-Castro T,Zhao DP,Lipa M,et al.Velamentous cord insertion in dichorionic and monochorionic twin pregnancies - Does it make a difference?[J].Placenta,2016,42:87-92.[5]王爱桃,王根枚,黄锦钿,等.妊娠晚期超声诊断帆状胎盘在产科的应用研究[J].中国医药科学,2016,6(17):146-148.[6]杨悦,张虹,程萌,等.157例帆状胎盘临床分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2016,31(21):4423-4425.[7]饶洪杰,柏艳红.彩色多普勒超声在诊断帆状胎盘及预测母婴结局中的应用[J].医学临床研究,2019,36(7):1421-1423.[8]胡维茜,黄枢,闫建平,等.球拍状胎盘与帆状胎盘的超声诊断分析[J].现代仪器与医疗,2017,23(5):13-14.[9]郭晓玥,邵辉,赵扬玉.前置血管25例临床分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2018,34(7):519-522.[10]王小倩,钟嘉杰,孙志伟.孕早期脐带附着部位与围产期并发症间的相关性研究[J].临床超声医学杂志,2019,21(5):362-365.[11]Ruiter L,Kok N,Limpens J,et al.Incidence of and risk indicators for vasa praevia:a systematic review[J].BJOG,2016,123(8):1278-1287.[12]张丹,花秋菊,林琳,等.前置血管14例临床分析[J].大连医科大学学报,2017,39(6):580-583. [13]Sullivan EA,Javid N,Duncombe G,et al.Vasa Previa Diagnosis,Clinical Practice,and Outcomes in Australia[J].Obstet Gynecol,2017,130(3):591-598.[14]汪淼,邓萍,李慧.产前超声诊断胎盘异常的临床意义[J].西部医学,2018,30(3):437-441.[15]薛梦玲.帆状胎盘相关危险因素及围产儿结局的临床研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2020.[16]Tsakiridis I,Mamopoulos A,Athanasiadis A,et al.Diagnosis and Management of Vasa Previa:A Comparison of 4 National Guidelines[J].Obstet Gynecol Surv,2019,74(7):436-442.[17]牟明燕,计晓娟.不同脐带入口部位的胎盘及脐带发育异常特征与诊断分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2017,32(22):5622-5624.[18]刘娜,王晓东,廖华,等.前置血管围产结局130例分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2020,36(3):214-218.[19]刘伟玲,曾莉,朱洁,等.帆状胎盘脐血管前置4例临床分析[J].江苏医药,2017,43(17):1277-1279.[20]李胜芳.帆状胎盘的高危因素分析及围产儿结局随访[J].中西医结合心血管病电子杂志,2017,5(13):183,186.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘 畅.牙周牙髓综合治疗在逆行性牙髓炎中的临床分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(03):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.03.036]
 LIU Chang.Clinical Analysis of Periodontal and Endodontic Comprehensive Treatment in Retrograde Pulpitis[J].Medical Information,2018,31(10):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.03.036]
[2]刘 丽.妊娠合并子宫肌瘤行剖宫产术中肌瘤切除的临床疗效分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(05):98.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.032]
 LIU li.Clinical Analysis of Myoma Resection during Cesarean Section for Pregnancy Complicated with Uterine Leiomyoma[J].Medical Information,2018,31(10):98.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.032]
[3]张朝霞.瘢痕子宫再次妊娠阴道分娩的可行性及安全性评价[J].医学信息,2018,31(06):104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.06.033]
 ZHANG Zhao-xia.Feasibility and Safety Evaluation of Vaginal Delivery after Re-pregnancy in Scared Uterus[J].Medical Information,2018,31(10):104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.06.033]
[4]李雪莲.妊娠合并糖尿病对分娩结局的影响观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(10):114.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.10.036]
 LI Xue-lian.Effect of Pregnancy Complicated with Diabetes on Delivery Outcome[J].Medical Information,2018,31(10):114.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.10.036]
[5]李正航,何松青.妊娠合并胰腺假性囊肿1例并文献复习[J].医学信息,2018,31(16):188.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.16.061]
[6]李 伟,陈素华.妊娠期人巨细胞病毒感染的中医药研究进展[J].医学信息,2019,32(01):37.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.01.013]
 LI Wei,CHEN Su-hua.Advances in Research on Traditional Chinese Medicine for Human Cytomegalovirus Infection during Pregnancy[J].Medical Information,2019,32(10):37.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.01.013]
[7]蒋红梅.丙基硫氧嘧啶与甲巯咪唑治疗妊娠合并甲状腺功能亢进的疗效比较[J].医学信息,2019,32(05):154.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.05.049]
 JIANG Hong-mei.Comparison of Propyl Thiouracil and Methimazole in the Treatment of Pregnancy with Hyperthyroidism[J].Medical Information,2019,32(10):154.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.05.049]
[8]王 红.复发性流产病因学研究现状分析[J].医学信息,2019,32(06):64.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.06.021]
 WANG Hong.Analysis of the Current Situation of Etiology of Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion[J].Medical Information,2019,32(10):64.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.06.021]
[9]林康杰,杨小敏.妊娠生理因素对甲状腺结节发病影响的研究进展[J].医学信息,2019,32(09):41.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.09.014]
 LIN Kang-jie,YANG Xiao-min.Advances in Research on the Effects of Physiological Factors of Pregnancy on the Pathogenesis of Thyroid Nodules[J].Medical Information,2019,32(10):41.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.09.014]
[10]帅秀芳,郑 慧.彩色多普勒超声诊断帆状胎盘和血管前置的临床价值及漏诊误诊原因分析[J].医学信息,2019,32(20):164.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.20.052]
 SHUAI Xiu-fang,ZHENG Hui.Clinical Value of Color Doppler Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Spiral Placenta and Vascular Preposition and Analysis of Misdiagnosis Causes of Missed Diagnosis[J].Medical Information,2019,32(10):164.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.20.052]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01