[1]冉瑞忠,王均强,戴永红,等.维稳执勤环境对官兵心理状态的影响分析[J].医学信息,2022,35(14):37-40.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.14.007]
　RAN Rui-zhong,WANG Jun-qiang,DAI Yong-hong,et al.Analysis of the Influence of Steady Work Environment on the Psychological State of Soldiers[J].Medical Information,2022,35(14):37-40.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.14.007]
点击复制

维稳执勤环境对官兵心理状态的影响分析()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2022年14期
页码:
37-40
栏目:
公共卫生信息学
出版日期:
2022-07-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of the Influence of Steady Work Environment on the Psychological State of Soldiers
文章编号:
1006-1959（2022）14-0037-04
作者:
冉瑞忠; 王均强; 戴永红; 等
（武警第二机动总队医院医学心理科1，内科2，骨科3，重症医学科4，江苏 无锡 214000）
Author(s):
RAN Rui-zhong; WANG Jun-qiang; DAI Yong-hong; et al.
(Department of Medical Psychology1,Department of Medicine2,Department of Orthopaedics3,Department of Critical Medicine4,the General Hospital of the Second Mobile Corps of the People’s Armed Police,Wuxi 214000,Jiangsu,China)
关键词:
维稳执勤环境; 执勤官兵; 心理状态; 社会支持
Keywords:
Maintenance of stability and duty environment; Officers and soldiers on duty; Mental state; Social support
分类号:
R395.6
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.14.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨执勤环境对官兵心理状态的影响，分析其影响因素。方法 于2019年12月-2020年2月采用症状自评量表（SCL-90）、自编适应环境问卷量表对武警某部南方某地区3150名居住在六类不同环境下的维稳执勤官兵进行心理评估，分析影响维稳执勤官兵心理状态的影响因素。结果 除事件刺激环境外，其余五类不同环境下维稳执勤官兵SCL-90评分均低于军人常模及地方常模，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），且不同环境下维稳执勤官兵SCL-90各因子分比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；自编适应环境量表显示，刺激源中的“批评责骂”占比达41.65%，“生活小事件”占41.29%，心理影响症状表现中“躯体症状”占比22.05%，“人际关系紧张”占比21.15%，而应对方式中“自身调整”占46.53%、“他人帮助”占30.42%、“参加集体活动”占16.81%；执勤官兵心理症状在开始执勤任务1个月内增加较多（30.06%），1~2个月时出现大幅减低（20.02%），2~4个月再次出现增幅（24.58%），4个月后增幅放缓（25.34%）。结论 环境改变、 刺激事件及缺少社会支持是影响官兵心理状态的主要因素，需在今后的工作中加以干预。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the effect of duty environment on the psychological state of soldiers and analyze its influencing factors.Methods From December 2019 to February 2020, the Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) and the self-designed adaptive environment questionnaire were used to assess the psychological status of 3150 stability-maintaining officers and soldiers living in six different environments in a certain southern part of the armed police, and the influencing factors of psychological status of stability-maintaining officers and soldiers were analyzed.Results In addition to the event-stimulated environment, the SCL-90 scores of the five types of stability maintenance officers and soldiers in different environments were lower than those of the military norm and the local norm, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05), there were significant differences in each factor score of SCL-90 among officers and soldiers in different environments (P<0.05). The self-made adaptive environment scale showed that "criticism and scolding" accounted for 41.65%, "life events" accounted for 41.29%, "physical symptoms" accounted for 22.05%, "interpersonal tension" accounted for 21.15%, and "self-adjustment" accounted for 46.53%, "help others" accounted for 30.42%, "participation in collective activities" accounted for 16.81%. The psychological symptoms of the officers and soldiers on duty increased more within one month after the start of duty (30.06%), decreased significantly within 1-2 months (20.02%), increased again within 2-4 months (24.58%), and slowed down after 4 months (25.34%).Conclusion Environmental change, stimulus events and lack of social support are the main factors affecting the psychological state of soldiers, which need to be intervened in future work.

参考文献/References:

[1]张川敏,梁铭,雷阳.新兵训练阶段心理工作要点探讨[J].武警医学,2012,23(11):998-1000.[2]郭旦峰,王岩,沈美华.武警官兵遂行处突反恐任务中的心理健康保障[J].武警后勤学院学报(医学版),2021,30(3):63-64.[3]袁媛,丁婷,高辉,等.我国南方盛夏气温主模态特征及其与海温异常的联系[J].大气科学,2018,42(6):1245-1262.[4]刘俊丽,刘云波,冯正直,等.12486名军人SCL-90测试结果分析[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2005,13(6):423-427.[5]Ram B,Limb ES,Shankar A,et al.Evaluating the effect of change in the built environment on mental health and subjective well-being: a natural experiment[J].J Epidemiol Community Health,2020,74(8):631-638. [6]范秀清.改变和创设环境,让学生更加自信[J].中国校外教育,2009(4):4-5.[7]Patel A,Joseph G,Killemsetty N,et al.Effects of residential mobility and migration on standards of living in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: A life-course approach[J].PLoS One,2020,15(9):e0239735.[8]Steenkamp MM,Litz BT,Hoge CW,et al.Psychotherapy for Military-Related PTSD: A Review of Randomized Clinical Trials[J].JAMA,2015,314(5):489-500. [9]Ozer EM,Rowe J,Tebb KP,et al.Fostering Engagement in Health Behavior Change: Iterative Development of an Interactive Narrative Environment to Enhance Adolescent Preventive Health Services[J].J Adolesc Health,2020,67(2S):S34-S44. [10]Medeiros E,Shrestha PN,Gaire H,et al.Life after armed group involvement in Nepal: A clinical ethnography of psychological well-being of former "child soldiers" over time[J].Transcult Psychiatry,2020,57(1):183-196.[11]Peterson C,Park N,Castro CA.Assessment for the U.S. Army Comprehensive Soldier Fitness program: the Global Assessment Tool[J].Am Psychol,2011,66(1):10-18. [12]Bestha D,Soliman L,Blankenship K,et al.The Walking Wounded: Emerging Treatments for PTSD[J].Curr Psychiatry Rep,2018,20(10):94.[13]Arora R,Rangnekar S.Relationships Between Emotional Stability, Psychosocial Mentoring Support and Career Resilience[J].Eur J Psychol,2015,11(1):16-33.[14]Li C,Martindale R,Sun Y.Relationships between talent development environments and mental toughness:The role of basic psychological need satisfaction[J].J Sports Sci,2019,37(18):2057-2065.[15]马志国.“南橘北枳”给班级管理的启示——发挥班级群体规范的心理环境作用[J].新班主任,2020(6):44-47.[16]Straud CL,Siev J,Messer S,et al.Examining military population and trauma type as moderators of treatment outcome for first-line psychotherapies for PTSD: A meta-analysis[J].J Anxiety Disord,2019,67:102133.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01