[1]黄 玲,张传彬,钟 鸣.去甲肾上腺素与凝血酶冻干粉内镜下喷洒的止血效果比较[J].医学信息,2022,35(19):130-132.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.19.037]
　HUANG Ling,ZHANG Chuan-bin,ZHONG Ming.Comparison of Hemostatic Effects of Norepinephrine and Lyophilizing Thrombin Powder Sprayed Under Endoscopy[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(19):130-132.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.19.037]
点击复制

去甲肾上腺素与凝血酶冻干粉内镜下喷洒的止血效果比较()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2022年19期
页码:
130-132
栏目:
药物与临床
出版日期:
2022-10-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Hemostatic Effects of Norepinephrine and Lyophilizing Thrombin Powder Sprayed Under Endoscopy
文章编号:
1006-1959（2022）19-0130-03
作者:
黄 玲; 张传彬; 钟 鸣
（上犹县人民医院消化内科，江西 上犹 341200）
Author(s):
HUANG Ling; ZHANG Chuan-bin; ZHONG Ming
(Department of Gastroenterology,Shangyou County People’s Hospital,Shangyou 341200,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
去甲肾上腺素; 凝血酶冻干粉; 内镜; 止血效果
Keywords:
Noradrenaline; Lyophilizing thrombin powder; Endoscopy; Hemostatic effect
分类号:
R573.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.19.037
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较去甲肾上腺素与凝血酶冻干粉内镜下喷洒的止血效果。方法 选取2019年1月-2021年6月我院诊治的72例消化道出血患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组，各36例。对照组在内镜下喷洒去甲肾上腺素治疗，观察组在内镜下喷洒凝血酶冻干粉治疗，比较两组临床疗效、止血时间、潜血转阴时间、72 h再出血率、凝血功能指标[血浆凝血酶原时间（PT）、活化部分凝血活酶原时间（APTT）、纤维蛋白原（Fbg）]以及不良反应发生情况。结果 观察组治疗总有效率为94.44%，高于对照组的83.33%（P＜0.05）；观察组止血时间、潜血转阴时间均短于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组72 h再出血率为5.56%，低于对照组的19.44%（P＜0.05）；观察组PT、APTT短于对照组，Fbg高于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组不良反应发生率为8.33%，低于对照组的19.44%（P＜0.05）。结论 去甲肾上腺素与凝血酶冻干粉内镜下喷洒均具有一定的止血效果，但凝血酶冻干粉治疗效果更优，可降低72 h再出血率，缩短止血和潜血转阴时间，促进凝血功能恢复，且不良反应少。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the hemostatic effects of norepinephrine and lyophilizing thrombin powder under endoscopy.Methods A total of 72 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding diagnosed and treated in our hospital from January 2019 to June 2021 were selected as the study subjects. They were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 36 cases in each group. The control group was treated with endoscopic spraying of norepinephrine, and the observation group was treated with endoscopic spraying of lyophilizing thrombin powder. The clinical efficacy, hemostasis time, occult blood negative conversion time, 72 h rebleeding rate, coagulation function indexes [plasma prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), fibrinogen (Fbg)] and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 94.44%, which was higher than 83.33% in the control group (P<0.05). The hemostasis time and occult blood negative time in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). The rebleeding rate at 72 h in the observation group was 5.56%, which was lower than 19.44% in the control group (P<0.05). PT and APTT in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group, and Fbg was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 8.33%, which was lower than 19.44% in the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion Norepinephrine and lyophilizing thrombin powder for endoscopic spraying have certain hemostatic effect, but lyophilizing thrombin powder has better therapeutic effect, which can reduce the 72 h rebleeding rate, shorten the time of hemostasis and occult blood negative conversion, promote the recovery of coagulation function, and have fewer adverse reactions.

参考文献/References:

[1]张佳楠.消化道出血的病因及危险因素分析[D].南昌:南昌大学,2021.[2]钱燎.内镜下大剂量去甲肾上腺素靶控注射联合氩离子凝固术治疗老年非静脉消化道出血的临床观察[J].广西医科大学学报,2016,33(4):603-606.[3]王延庆.内镜下金属钛夹和喷洒药物治疗上消化道出血临床研究[J].中国合理用药探索,2017,14(10):67-70.[4]吴琦玮,沈榕,张莉.内镜下喷洒止血联合不同药物治疗非静脉曲张性消化道出血的疗效比较[J].中华保健医学杂志,2019,21(1):72-73,76.[5]胡柯峰,叶国良,金燕平,等.内镜下医用胶喷洒预防双联抗血小板药物治疗者上消化道早癌内镜黏膜下剥离术迟发性出血的疗效观察[J].中国中西医结合消化杂志,2017,25(3):226-229.[6]庞艳华,杜丽川,郝建宇,等.急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血内镜下诊治分析及Glasgow-Blatchford评分系统在急诊内镜检查前的预判作用[J].中国急救医学,2018,38(9):810-813.[7]翁慧斌,边君,林海,等.胃镜下重酒石酸去甲肾上腺素喷洒与注射治疗急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的疗效比较[J].中国内镜杂志,2019,25(4):19-23.[8]陈旻湖.优化质子泵抑制剂在非静脉曲张性上消化道出血中的应用[J].中华消化杂志,2019,39(3):145-147.[9]李科,陈竹林.内镜下不同止血方法在非静脉曲张性消化道出血治疗中的效果比较[J].中国疗养医学,2018,27(4):443-445.[10]白托娅.上消化道出血病例回顾性分析及NSAIDs相关性上消化道出血临床特点探讨[D].大连:大连医科大学,2021.[11]袁国钧,蔡华容.内镜止血治疗急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的临床观察[J].湖南师范大学学报(医学版),2017,14(5):113-116.[12]张吉桂,周翔禹.消化内镜下不同止血夹治疗上消化道出血的疗效及对白蛋白、血红蛋白和血小板水平的影响[J].中国内镜杂志,2021,27(2):76-82.[13]张献文,竹建强,冯凯祥.内镜下钛夹联合药物治疗非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的止血效果及机体的应激和炎症程度评估[J].海军医学杂志,2017,38(1):46-49.[14]黄理,陈丽芬,覃冬林,等.内镜止血在急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血治疗中的临床应用[J].现代生物医学进展,2016,16(20):3912-3914.[15]金国源,王立英.应用四种内镜下止血法治疗非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者的疗效及预后分析[J].中国医师杂志,2016,18(1):133-134.[16]崔萍.内镜下联合应用凝血酶和去甲肾上腺素治疗急性上消化道出血[J].河北医学,2007,13(8):954-955.[17]李韬,阮军忠,李福根,等.凝血酶冻干粉应用于肺癌根治术中的止血效果分析[J].中国医刊,2021,56(6):660-663.[18]熊康伟,程思乐,杨晶,等.吸引管联合内镜法治疗上消化道大出血三例[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2019,36(2):140-141. [19]D’Assuncao MA,Kroner PT,Kumar U,et al.Endoscopic reinforcement of the anastomosis followed by targeted endoscopic hemostasis for massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding after Whipple’s surgery[J].Endoscopy,2016,48(Suppl 1):E22-E23.[20]高颖.消化内镜下局部药物联合去甲肾上腺素治疗上消化道出血的疗效观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(10):104-106.

相似文献/References:

[1]高 颖.消化内镜下局部药物联合去甲肾上腺素治疗 上消化道出血的疗效观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(10):104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.10.032]
　GAO Ying.Clinical Observation of Digestive Endoscopy Combined with Norepinephrine in the Treatment of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.10.032]
[2]马 磊,张民旺.解郁丸联合草酸艾司西酞普兰治疗卒中后抑郁的临床观察[J].医学信息,2021,34(17):163.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.17.044]
　MA Lei,ZHANG Min-wang.Clinical Observation of Jieyu Pills Combined with Escitalopram Oxalate in the Treatment of Post-stroke Depression[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(19):163.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.17.044]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01