[1]程 杰,王士杰,孙寒蕾.Vitapex及AH plus糊剂联合应用治疗牙周牙髓联合病变的临床观察[J].医学信息,2023,36(02):138-140,144.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.02.029]
　CHENG Jie,WANG Shi-jie,SUN Han-lei.Clinical Observation of Vitapex Combined with AH Plus Paste in the Treatment of Combined Periodontal-endodontic Lesions[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(02):138-140,144.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.02.029]
点击复制

Vitapex及AH plus糊剂联合应用治疗牙周牙髓联合病变的临床观察()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2023年02期
页码:
138-140,144
栏目:
药物与临床
出版日期:
2023-01-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Observation of Vitapex Combined with AH Plus Paste in the Treatment of Combined Periodontal-endodontic Lesions
文章编号:
1006-1959（2023）02-0138-04
作者:
程 杰; 王士杰; 孙寒蕾
（天津市蓟州区中医院口腔科，天津 301900）
Author(s):
CHENG Jie; WANG Shi-jie; SUN Han-lei
(Department of Stomatology,Tianjin Jizhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Tianjin 301900,China)
关键词:
Vitapex; AH plus糊剂; 联合治疗; 牙周牙髓联合病变
Keywords:
Vitapex; AH Plus paste; Combined therapy; Combined periodontal-endodontic lesions
分类号:
R781.3；R781.4
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.02.029
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 观察Vitapex及AH plus糊剂联合应用治疗牙周牙髓联合病变的临床疗效。方法 选取2019年4月-2021年1月在我院诊治的82例牙周牙髓联合病变患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组，各41例。两组均给予常规牙周基础治疗，对照组采用AH plus糊剂填充根管，观察组采用Vitapex及AH plus糊剂联合填充根管，比较两组治疗1周内急症反应、临床疗效、牙周健康指标、疼痛评分、并发症发生率。结果 治疗1周内，观察组急症反应发生率为4.88%，与对照组的7.32%比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；观察组治疗总有效率为97.56%，高于对照组的85.37%（P＜0.05）；两组治疗后龈沟出血指数（SBI）、牙周探诊深度（PD）、探诊出血指数（BOP）、牙龈指数（GI）、松动度（TM）、菌斑指数（PLI）均低于治疗前，观察组低于对照组，观察组疼痛评分低于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组并发症发生率为7.32%，低于对照组的14.63%（P＜0.05）。结论 Vitapex及AH plus糊剂联合应用治疗牙周牙髓联合病变效果确切，可提高治疗疗效，改善牙周健康指标，减轻疼痛，降低并发症发生率，具有显著的临床应用优势，值得临床应用。
Abstract:
Objective To observe the clinical effect of Vitapex combined with AH plus paste in the treatment of combined periodontal-endodontic lesions.Methods A total of 82 patients with combined periodontal-endodontic lesions diagnosed and treated in our hospital from April 2019 to January 2021 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 41 cases in each group. Both groups were given routine periodontal basic treatment, while the control group was filled with AH plus paste, and the observation group was filled with Vitapex and AH plus paste. The emergency response, clinical efficacy, periodontal health index, pain score and complication rate were observed and compared between the two groups within 1 week of treatment.Results Within 1 week of treatment, the incidence of acute reaction in the observation group was 4.88%, which was compared with 7.32% in the control group, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 97.56%, which was higher than 85.37% in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the gingival sulcus bleeding index (SBI), periodontal probing depth (PD), probing bleeding index (BOP), gingival index (GI), mobility (TM) and plaque index (PLI) of the two groups were lower than those before treatment, while the observation group was lower than the control group, and the pain score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was 7.32%, which was lower than 14.63% in the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion The combination of Vitapex and AH plus paste is effective in the treatment of combined periodontal-endodontic lesions, which can improve the therapeutic effect, improve periodontal health indicators, reduce pain, and reduce the incidence of complications. It has significant clinical application advantages and is worthy of clinical application.

参考文献/References:

[1]贾彦,李新月.根管治疗术对重度牙周牙髓联合病变患牙牙周再生效果的影响[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2018,28(6):350-355.[2]侯亚静,黄定明.感染根管细菌内毒素的致病机制与清除策略[J].口腔医学研究,2020,36(1):7-9.[3]黄芳.牙周牙髓联合病变应用经根管注射Vitapex糊剂加盐酸米诺环素软膏治疗的预后情况研究[J].中国医药科学,2021,10(25):26-28.[4]郭莉,林彤,冯颖.盐酸米诺环素联合甲硝唑或替硝唑治疗慢性牙周炎的疗效及安全性比较[J].药物评价研究,2017,40(9):1294-1296.[5]谭学东.盐酸米诺环素缓释抗菌软膏修复牙周牙髓联合病变的临床分析[J].黑龙江医药科学,2017,40(1):121-122.[6]薛昌岚.经根管使用Vitapex联合米诺环素治疗牙髓牙周联合病变的临床研究[J].河北医科大学学报,2016,37(4):456-458.[7]Cho YD,Lee JE,Chung Y,et al.Collaborative management ofcombined periodontal-endodontic lesions with a palatogingivalgroove: a case series[J].Journal of Endodontics,2017,43(2):332-337.[8]张敏,周艳,宦泓,等.引导性组织再生联合植骨术对Ⅰ型牙周-牙髓联合病变的临床疗效分析[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2018,28(12):720-723.[9]黄晓君,赵书山.盐酸米诺环素联合多联抗生素糊剂对牙周炎合并牙髓病变相关炎症因子的影响[J].临床药物治疗杂志,2018,16(9):19-23.[10]申林,于淑玲,苏阳,等.半导体激光用于治疗窦道型慢性根尖周炎的临床效果观察[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2020,34(6):352-356.[11]刘宇明,段昌华,翟炜东.盐酸米诺环素缓释剂联合Vitapex治疗老年慢性牙周炎合并牙髓病变疗效分析[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2017,10(8):480-483.[12]Lukac N,Jezersek M.Amplification of pressure waves in laser-assisted endodontics with synchronized delivery of Er:YAG laserpulses[J].Lasers Med Sci,2018,33(4):823-833.[13]孟楠林.环氧树脂和生物陶瓷类糊剂用于口腔修复对牙周组织损伤的影响[J].海南医学院学报,2017,23(9):1301-1304.[14]李黎,槐勇,王洪萍.盐酸米诺环素联合Vitapex治疗牙周牙髓联合病变疗效观察[J].人民军医,2019,21(12):85-88.[15]范美君,王金龄,赵焱.盐酸米诺环素软膏局部用药联合Vitapex糊剂根管注射治疗牙周牙髓联合病变患者疗效观察[J].中国地方病防治杂志,2018,33(3):337,339.[16]朱晓云.超声冲洗联合氢氧化钙糊剂用于一次法根管治疗的疗效观察[J].河北医药,2018,40(11):1707-1710.[17]徐燕群,薛慧.经根管注射Vitapex糊剂联合派丽奥治疗牙周牙髓联合病变的疗效及对患者血清炎症因子的影响[J].广西医科大学学报,2017,34(12):1738-1741.[18]聂子林,黄荣.替硝唑片及盐酸米诺环素软膏辅助根管治疗牙周-牙髓联合病变[J].黑龙江医药,2018,31(5):1070-1072.[19]孙贺,刘彦.双波长激光联合辅助治疗牙周牙髓联合病变的疗效及对患者PLI、BI、PD和CAL指标的影响[J].海南医学,2019,30(3):349-352.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01