[1]李彦君,杨朝坤,李明前,等.胸腔镜肺叶切除术后应用单根负压引流球管支气管残端旁引流的临床研究[J].医学信息,2023,36(10):64-67.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.10.015]
　LI Yan-jun,YANG Chao-kun,LI Ming-qian,et al.Clinical Study of Bronchial Stump Drainage of Single Negative Pressure Drainage Tube After Thoracoscopic Lobectomy of Lung Cancer[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(10):64-67.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.10.015]
点击复制

胸腔镜肺叶切除术后应用单根负压引流球管支气管残端旁引流的临床研究()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2023年10期
页码:
64-67
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2023-05-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Study of Bronchial Stump Drainage of Single Negative Pressure Drainage Tube After Thoracoscopic Lobectomy of Lung Cancer
文章编号:
1006-1959（2023）10-0064-04
作者:
李彦君; 杨朝坤; 李明前; 等
（1.川北医学院临床医学系，四川 南充 637600；2.宜宾市第二人民医院胸心外科，四川 宜宾 644000）
Author(s):
LI Yan-jun; YANG Chao-kun; LI Ming-qian; et al.
(1.School of Medicine,North Sichuan Medical College,Nanchong 637600,Sichuan,China; 2.Department of Thoracic Surgery,Yibin Second People’s Hospital,Yibin 644000,Sichuan,China)
关键词:
胸腔镜肺叶切除术; 负压引流; 胸内残腔
Keywords:
Thoracoscopic lobectomy; Negative pressure drainage; Chest residual cavity
分类号:
R734.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.10.015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 对比支气管残端旁16F引流管接负压球引流和传统胸腔闭式引流在胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的临床价值。方法 选取2018年1月-2020年12月于宜宾市第二人民医院行三孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术的135例患者，试验组应用16F引流管支气管残端旁引流，末端接负压球，对照组应用32F硅胶引流管引流，末端接水封瓶，比较两组术后并发症、临床引流效果和疼痛情况。结果 试验组术后并发症总发生率低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；两组胸腔总引流量、引流管留置时间、术后住院时间、术后抗生素使用时间及住院费用比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；试验组术后24 h VAS评分低于对照组，术后镇痛药物使用天数短于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 对于胸腔镜肺叶切除术后，支气管残端旁16F引流管接负压球引流与传统胸腔闭式引流临床引流效果相当，而16F引流管接负压球引流有助于减轻术后疼痛，减少术后胸内残腔。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical value of 16F drainage tube combined with negative pressure ball drainage and traditional closed thoracic drainage in thoracoscopic lobectomy of lung cancer.Methods A total of 135 patients who underwent three-hole thoracoscopic lobectomy of lung cancer in Yibin Second People’s Hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 were selected. The experimental group was treated with 16F drainage tube bronchial stump drainage, and the end was connected with negative pressure ball. The control group was treated with 32F silicone drainage tube drainage, and the end was connected with water sealing bottle. The postoperative complications, clinical drainage effect and pain were compared between the two groups.Results The total incidence of postoperative complications in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in total thoracic drainage volume, drainage tube indwelling time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative antibiotic use time and hospitalization cost between the two groups (P>0.05). The VAS score at 24 h after operation in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, and the number of days of postoperative analgesic drug use was shorter than that in the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion For thoracoscopic lobectomy, the clinical drainage effect of 16F drainage tube next to the bronchial stump combined with negative pressure ball drainage is equivalent to that of traditional closed thoracic drainage, while 16F drainage tube combined with negative pressure ball drainage helps to reduce postoperative pain and reduce postoperative thoracic residual cavity.

参考文献/References:

[1]Liu ZJ,Zhang YL,Huang YG.Prehabilitation in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer: Current situation and future perspectives[J].Journal of Thoracic Disease,2020,12(8):4578-4580.[2]Yang CFJ,Kumar A,Deng JZ,et al.A National Analysis of Short-term Outcomes and Long-term Survival Following Thoracoscopic Versus Open Lobectomy for Clinical Stage II Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer[J].Annals of Surgery,2021,273(3):595-605.[3]Sihoe ADL.Uniportal Lung Cancer Surgery: State of the Evidence[J].Annals of Thoracic Surgery,2019,107(3):962-972.[4]Deng B,Qian K,Zhou JH,et al.Optimization of Chest Tube Management to Expedite Rehabilitation of Lung Cancer Patients After Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review[J].World Journal of Surgery,2017,41(8):2039-2045.[5]Li P,Li S,Che G.Role of chest tube drainage in physical function after thoracoscopic lung resection[J].Journal of Thoracic Disease,2019,11(Suppl 15):S1947-S1950.[6]Koryllos A,Eggeling S,Schega O,et al.Delphi Expert Consensus of the German Thoracic Surgery Society on the Management of Chest Tube Drainage[J].Zentralbl Chir,2020,145(1):99-107.[7]You J,Zhang H,Li W,et al.Single versus double chest drains after pulmonary lobectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].World Journal of Surgical Oncology,2020,18(1):1-9.[8]Nakanishi R,Fujino Y,Kato M,et al.Early chest tube removal after thoracoscopic lobectomy with the aid of an additional thin tube: a prospective multi-institutional study[J].General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery,2018,66(12):723-730.[9]Batchelor TJP,Rasburn NJ,Abdelnour-Berchtold E,et al.Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: Recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS)[J].European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery,2019,55(1):91-115.[10]Liu L,Che G,Pu Q,et al.A new concept of endoscopic lung cancer resection: Single-direction thoracoscopic lobectomy[J].Surgical Oncology,2010,19(2):e71-e77.[11]Stein C.New Concepts in Opioid Analgesia[J].Expert Opin Investig Drugs,2018,27(10):765-775.[12]Ye W,Hackett S,Vandevelde C,et al.Comparing the visual analog scale and the numerical rating scale in patient-reported outcomes in psoriatic arthritis[J].Journal of Rheumatology,2021,48(6):836-840.[13]Kehlet H,Joshi GP.Enhanced recovery after surgery: Current controversies and concerns[J].Anesthesia and Analgesia,2017,125(6):2154-2155.[14]Song Y,Zheng C,Zhou S,et al.The application analysis of 8F ultrafine chest drainage tube for thoracoscopic lobectomy of lung cancer[J].Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery,2021,16(1):1-7.[15]Patella M,Saporito A,Mongelli F,et al.Management of residual pleural space after lung resection: Fully controllable paralysis of the diaphragm through continuous phrenic nerve block[J].Journal of Thoracic Disease,2018,10(8):4883-4890.[16]Pan XJ,Ou DB,Lin X,et al.Management of Pleural Space after Lung Resection by Cryoneuroablation of Phrenic Nerve: A Randomized Study[J].Surgical Innovation,2017,24(3):240-244.[17]李悟,王小平,王忠华,等.胸部手术后残腔综合处理38例[J].临床军医杂志,2016,44(1):103-104.[18]Cui Z,Zhang Y,Xu C,et al.Comparison of the results of two chest tube managements during an enhanced recovery program after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: A randomized trial[J].Thoracic Cancer,2019,10(10):1993-1999.[19]Gonzalez-Rivas D,Fieira E,de la Torre M,et al.Bronchovascular right upper lobe reconstruction by uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery[J].Journal of Thoracic Disease,2014,6(6):861-863.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙素花,宋建防,褚海辰,等.右美托咪定经鼻给药在胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的疗效观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(07):78.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.025]
　SUN Su-hua,SONG Jian-fang,CHU Hai-chen,et al.Efficacy of Dexmetomidine in Thoracoscopic Lobectomy by Nasal Administration[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(10):78.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.025]
[2]朱书芳.纯次氯酸冲洗液应用1例创伤后骨髓炎的治疗[J].医学信息,2018,31(12):186.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.061]
　ZHU Shu-fang.Treatment of 1 Cases of Post-traumatic Osteomyelitis with Pure Hypochloric Acid Irrigating Solution[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(10):186.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.061]
[3]杨小强,丁 伟,张小亮,等.不同浓度罗哌卡因行胸椎旁神经阻滞麻醉对老年胸腔镜肺叶切除术患者围手术期镇痛的效果[J].医学信息,2021,34(24):131.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.24.033]
　YANG Xiao-qiang,DING Wei,ZHANG Xiao-liang,et al.Perioperative Analgesic Effect of Different Concentrations of Ropivacaine for Thoracic Paravertebral Block Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Lobectomy[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(10):131.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.24.033]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01