[1]杜向钰.改良头皮半冠状切口在颧骨颧弓骨折患者切开复位内固定术中的应用[J].医学信息,2023,36(18):128-131.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.18.024]
　DU Xiang-yu.Application of Modified Scalp Semi-coronal Incision in Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Patients with Fracture of Zygoma and Zygomatic Arch[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(18):128-131.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.18.024]
点击复制

改良头皮半冠状切口在颧骨颧弓骨折患者切开复位内固定术中的应用()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2023年18期
页码:
128-131
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2023-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of Modified Scalp Semi-coronal Incision in Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Patients with Fracture of Zygoma and Zygomatic Arch
文章编号:
1006-1959（2023）18-0128-04
作者:
杜向钰
（新沂市人民医院口腔科，江苏 新沂 221400）
Author(s):
DU Xiang-yu
(Department of Stomatology,Xinyi People’s Hospital,Xinyi 221400,Jiangsu,China)
关键词:
改良头皮半冠状切口; 颧骨颧弓骨折; 切开复位内固定术
Keywords:
Modified scalp semi-coronal incision; Fracture of zygoma and zygomatic arch; Open reduction and internal fixation
分类号:
R782.4
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.18.024
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 观察改良头皮半冠状切口在颧骨颧弓骨折患者切开复位内固定术中的应用效果。方法 选取2017年7月-2022年7月我院诊治的40例颧骨颧弓骨折患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组和治疗组，各20例。两组均采用内固定钛板进行内固定，对照组选择常规头皮半冠状切口，治疗组采用改良头皮半冠状切口，比较两组临床手术指标（切口长度、术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间）、骨折愈合优良率、双侧颧弓突度差、软组织畸形、张口度、并发症发生率、咀嚼功能评分以及治疗满意度。结果 治疗组手术切口、术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间均小于对照组（P＜0. 05）；治疗组颧骨颧弓骨折愈合优良率为95.00%，高于对照组的80.00%（P＜0.05）；治疗组双侧颧弓突度差、软组织畸形均小于对照组，张口度大于对照组（P＜0.05）；治疗组并发症发生率为5.00%，低于对照组的20.00%（P＜0.05）；治疗组咀嚼功能评分低于对照组（P＜0.05）；治疗组治疗满意度为100.00%，高于对照组的85.00%（P＜0.05）。结论 在颧骨颧弓骨折切开复位内固定术中选择改良头皮半冠状切口，可减小术中出血量，缩短手术和住院时间，提高骨折愈合优良率，减小双侧颧弓突度差和软组织畸形，增加张口度，降低并发症发生率，促进咀嚼功能恢复，提升患者治疗满意度。
Abstract:
Objective To observe the application effect of modified scalp semi-coronal incision in open reduction and internal fixation for patients with fracture of zygoma and zygomatic arch.Methods A total of 40 patients with fracture of zygoma and zygomatic arch in our hospital from July 2017 to July 2022 were randomly divided into control and treatment groups, with 20 patients in each group. Both groups were treated with internal fixation with titanium plate, while the control group was treated with conventional scalp semi-coronal incision, and the treatment group was treated with modified scalp semi-coronal incision. The clinical operation indexes (incision length, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, hospitalization time), excellent and good rate of fracture healing, poor bilateral zygomatic arch protrusion, soft tissue deformity, mouth opening, complication rate, masticatory function score and treatment satisfaction were compared between the two groups.Results The surgical incision, intraoperative blood loss, operation time and hospitalization time in the treatment group were less than those in the control group (P<0.05). The excellent and good rate of fracture of zygoma and zygomatic arch healing in the treatment group was 95.00%, which was higher than 80.00% in the control group (P<0.05). The bilateral zygomatic arch protrusion and soft tissue deformity in the treatment group were less than those in the control group, and the mouth opening was greater than that in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the treatment group was 5.00%, which was lower than 20.00% in the control group (P<0.05). The masticatory function score of the treatment group was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). The treatment satisfaction of the treatment group was 100.00%, which was higher than 85.00% of the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion The modified scalp semi-coronal incision in the open reduction and internal fixation of fracture of zygoma and zygomatic arch can reduce the intraoperative blood loss, shorten the operation and hospitalization time, improve the excellent and good rate of fracture healing, reduce the bilateral zygomatic arch protrusion and soft tissue deformity, increase the mouth opening, reduce the incidence of complications, promote the recovery of masticatory function, and improve the treatment satisfaction of patients.

参考文献/References:

[1]林钊锐.联合切口结合微型钛板在颧骨颧弓骨折治疗中的应用[J].海南医学,2017,28(15):2538-2539.[2]Vujcich N,Gebauer D.Current and evolving trends in the management of facial fractures[J].Aust Dent J,2018,63 Suppl 1:S35-S47.[3]孙玉华,王天啸,石利新,等.颧骨复合体骨折不同手术切口的对比观察[J].徐州医科大学学报,2018,38(12):827-831.[4]Peretti N,MacLeod S.Zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: diagnosis and treatment[J].Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2017,25(4):314-319. [5]梁非照,雷荣昌,马文涛.冠状切口不同入路治疗颧骨复合体骨折的临床研究[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2015,36(23):3482-3484.[6]周晓霖,陈辉,马力强,等.眉弓下及口内联合切口治疗颧骨复合体骨折的临床效果评价[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2020,13(2):123-126.[7]田荣祥,任玉峰.颧骨复合体骨折坚固内固定方法探讨[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2017,31(2):122-124.[8]刘正武,郑灵,丘小丽,等.冠状切口入路治疗颧骨颧弓骨折146例临床分析[J].广西医科大学学报,2014,31(4):653-655.[9]苏法仁,田李静.改良头皮半冠状切口在颧骨颧弓骨折患者切开复位内固定术中的应用[J].山东医药,2012,52(11):80-81.[10]Liu M,Lv K,Li Z,et al.Using a Modified Postauricular Hemicoronal Incision to Manage Unilateral Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fracture[J].J Craniofac Surg,2019,30(8):e740-e741.[11]郭骏,陈红洁,廖娟,等.局部联合小切口治疗颧骨复合体骨折的疗效评价[J].实用医院临床杂志,2019,16(3):117-120. [12]孟恋亲.局部小切口治疗颧骨颧弓骨折的临床疗效分析[D].芜湖:皖南医学院,2019.[13]寇强勇,李麒麟,赵晖,等.可吸收内固定材料在不完全颧骨骨折中的应用及临床效果[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2017,33(9):542-544.[14]李庆华.颧颞区微创切口治疗颧骨颧弓骨折的疗效观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(19):185-186.[15]张雷,霍永力,孙志干.半冠状切口在颧骨颧弓多发性骨折坚固内固定术中的应用[J].宁夏医学杂志,2000,22(9):565.[16]谢潇,邢乐君.眉弓下切口与冠状切口治疗老年人颧骨颧弓骨折的比较研究[J].中华老年口腔医学杂志,2022,20(3):138-143.[17]李树华,关建,张玉君,等.改良头皮冠状切口在治疗颧骨复杂性骨折中的临床应用[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2018,25(1):38-40.[18]李昆仑.局部小切口结合可吸收接骨板内固定治疗颧骨颧弓骨折[J].实用中西医结合临床,2017,17(4):70-71.[19]尹霞.不同切口对颧骨颧弓复合体骨折治疗效果的对比研究[D].吉林:吉林大学,2020.

相似文献/References:

[1]李庆华.颧颞区微创切口治疗颧骨颧弓骨折的疗效观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(19):185.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.19.059]
　LI Qing-hua.Therapeutic Effect of Fracture of Zygoma and Zygomatic Arch by Minimally Invasive Incision in Zygomaticotemporal Region[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(18):185.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.19.059]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01