[1]王金英.卡前列甲酯栓联合麦角新碱预防瘢痕子宫剖宫产产后出血的临床效果及安全性[J].医学信息,2023,36(23):107-110.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.23.027]
 WANG Jin-ying.Clinical Effect and Safety of Methyl Carprost Suppositories Combined with Ergonovine in Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage of Cesarean Section of Scar Uterus[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(23):107-110.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.23.027]
点击复制

卡前列甲酯栓联合麦角新碱预防瘢痕子宫剖宫产产后出血的临床效果及安全性()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2023年23期
页码:
107-110
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2023-12-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Effect and Safety of Methyl Carprost Suppositories Combined with Ergonovine in Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage of Cesarean Section of Scar Uterus
文章编号:
1006-1959(2023)23-0107-04
作者:
王金英
(莲花县妇幼保健院妇产科,江西 莲花 337100)
Author(s):
WANG Jin-ying
(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Lianhua County Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Lianhua 337100,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
瘢痕子宫剖宫产产后出血卡前列甲酯栓麦角新碱血红蛋白
Keywords:
Scarred uterusCesarean sectionPostpartum hemorrhageMethyl carprost suppositoriesErgometrineHemoglobin
分类号:
R714
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.23.027
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探究卡前列甲酯栓联合麦角新碱对瘢痕子宫(SU)剖宫产患者产后出血(PPH)的预防效果及安全性。方法 以2020年10月-2022年10月我院拟行剖宫产分娩的60例SU产妇为研究对象,依据随机数字表法分为对照组(30例)与观察组(30例)。对照组于胎儿娩出后采用卡前列甲酯栓舌下给药,观察组在其基础上联合麦角新碱子宫颈注射,比较两组PPH预防效果、产后出血量(术后2、24 h)、血常规[血红蛋白(Hb)及红细胞压积(HCT)]、产后恢复情况(术后住院时间、恶露持续时间、子宫底下降速度)、不良反应。结果 观察组PPH预防总有效率高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组术后2、24 h出血量均少于对照组(P<0.05);两组术后HCT低于术前(P<0.05),但组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组术后Hb低于术前,但观察组Hb高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组术后住院时间、恶露持续时间短于对照组,且子宫底下降速度大于对照组(P<0.05);两组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 卡前列甲酯栓联合麦角新碱对SU剖宫产产妇的PPH风险具有良好预防效果,可降低其产后出血量,减少血红蛋白流失,加速子宫复旧,且用药安全性高。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the preventive effect and safety of methyl carprost suppositories combined with ergometrine on postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in cesarean section patients with scar uterus (SU).Methods From October 2020 to October 2022, 60 pregnant women with SU who planned to undergo cesarean section in our hospital were selected as the research objects. According to the random number table method, they were divided into control group (30 pregnant women) and observation group (30 pregnant women). The control group was given sublingual administration of methyl carprost suppositories after delivery, and the observation group was combined with ergometrine cervical injection on the basis of the control group. The preventive effect of PPH, postpartum hemorrhage (2 h and 24 h after operation), blood routine [hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (HCT)], postpartum recovery (postoperative hospitalization time, duration of lochia, decline rate of uterine fundus) and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rate of PPH prevention in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The amount of bleeding at 2 and 24 h after operation in the observation group was less than that in the control group (P<0.05). The HCT of the two groups after operation was lower than that before operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The Hb of the two groups after operation was lower than that before operation, but the Hb of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The postoperative hospitalization time and duration of lochia in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group, and the decline rate of uterine fundus was greater than that in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion Methyl carprost suppositories combined with ergometrine has a good preventive effect on PPH risk in women with SU cesarean section, which can reduce the amount of postpartum hemorrhage, reduce the loss of hemoglobin, accelerate uterine involution, and have high drug safety.

参考文献/References:

[1]王爱琴.瘢痕子宫再次妊娠经阴道分娩对产妇出血量 住院时间及新生儿健康的影响[J].中国药物与临床,2018,18(8):1350-1351.[2]Hochler H,Wainstock T,Lipschuetz M,et al.Induction of labor in women with a scarred uterus: does grand multiparity affect the risk of uterine rupture?[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM,2020,2(1):100081.[3]王改玲.比较初次剖宫产和瘢痕子宫再次妊娠二次剖宫产的母婴结局[J].河南外科学杂志,2019,25(3):149-150.[4]Miyakoshi K,Otani T,Kondoh E,et al.Retrospective multicenter study of leaving the placenta in situ for patients with placenta previa on a cesarean scar[J].Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2018,140(3):345-351.[5]孟贵琴.缩宫素联合卡贝缩宫素预防剖宫产术中子宫收缩乏力引起产后出血的临床疗效分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2020,35(15):2765-2767.[6]张冬梅.卡前列甲酯栓联合缩宫素治疗瘢痕子宫合并前置胎盘再次剖宫产对产后出血的影响[J].中国药物与临床,2020,20(24):4123-4124.[7]李莉,刘媛媛,邹佑军.卡前列甲酯栓联合缩宫素对瘢痕子宫剖宫产患者产后出血的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2017,9(2):33-35.[8]史琳娜,王艳妮.马来酸麦角新碱联合缩宫素预防宫缩乏力性产后出血的疗效及安全性观察[J].贵州医药,2022,46(1):94-95.[9]仇茜,姚荣华,黄俊杰,等.麦角新碱与卡前列素氨丁三醇联合预防瘢痕子宫再次剖宫产患者产后出血的效果及对GSH-px SOD MDA产后泌乳情况的影响[J].河北医学,2021,27(11):1901-1907.[10]韩秀慧,李增彦.马来酸麦角新碱联合卡前列素氨丁三醇治疗二次剖宫产产后出血患者的临床研究[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2020,36(6):606-609.[11]郑娟,刘艳萍.卡贝缩宫素、麦角新碱联合子宫压缩缝合预防瘢痕子宫剖宫产产后出血效果[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2020,28(6):922-924,930.[12]谢婷,卓庚秀,朱路芳.马来酸麦角新碱辅助治疗剖宫产产后出血的疗效[J].实用临床医药杂志,2020,24(9):104-107.[13]吴亚萍,瞿福娟,郭楚.卡孕栓联合缩宫素对瘢痕子宫剖宫产产后出血的预防效果[J].海南医学,2019,30(19):2518-2520.[14]何立梅,罗清,冯倩,等.卡前列甲酯栓联合葡萄糖酸钙防治瘢痕子宫阴道分娩产后出血的临床研究[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2019,11(1):56-58.[15]贾源君,焦娜.马来酸麦角新碱联合卡贝缩宫素预防瘢痕子宫妊娠产后出血效果[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2020,28(3):345-348.[16]冯晓云,韩冰,徐桂冉,等.缩宫素联合马来酸麦角新碱预防宫缩乏力产后出血的疗效及安全性探讨[J].解放军预防医学杂志,2019,37(1):111-113.[17]陈红红,蔡红,杨荣莉.卡前列甲酯联合马来酸麦角新碱预防瘢痕子宫产妇经阴道分娩产后出血的临床效果[J].中国妇幼保健,2020,35(24):4696-4698.[18]朱振宇,朱小进,王学.马来酸麦角新碱联合卡前列素氨丁三醇对宫缩乏力产后出血的效果[J].西北药学杂志,2022,37(4):107-111.[19]汪俊丽,胡南英,魏岩.缩宫素联合麦角新碱与单纯应用缩宫素预防选择性剖宫产产后出血的疗效与安全性研究[J].中国药理学通报,2018,34(9):1331-1332.[20]卫蔷,张力,吴琳,等.麦角新碱联合卡贝缩宫素与单用缩宫素预防剖宫产产后出血研究[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2018,34(6):640-644.[21]袁梅,余婧.麦角新碱联合卡贝缩宫素预防剖宫产产后出血效果及对炎症因子水平的影响研究[J].贵州医药,2021,45(3):412-413.[22]朱甜,陈风仁.麦角新碱联合卡孕栓治疗产后出血临床效果分析[J].临床军医杂志,2021,49(6):695-696,699.[23]金萍,石少权.麦角新碱联合缩宫素治疗临产后剖宫产产后出血的临床观察[J].药物评价研究,2018,41(2):302-304.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘汉芬.剖宫产术后护理干预对产妇康复效果的影响分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(01):169.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.01.067]
 LIU Han-fen.Effect of Nursing Intervention on Maternal Rehabilitation after Cesarean Section[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(23):169.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.01.067]
[2]李 欢,刘 俊,夏军辉.妊娠期高血压疾病患者血浆Pro BNP水平及其临床意义[J].医学信息,2018,31(04):158.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.059]
 LI Huan,LIU Jun,XIA Jun-hui.Plasma Pro BNP Levels in Patients with Hypertensive Disorder Complicating Pregnancy and their Clinical Significance[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(23):158.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.059]
[3]薛志雯.瘢痕子宫再次妊娠选择不同分娩方式的效果分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(04):186.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.071]
 XUE Zhi-wen.Analysis of Different Delivery Modes in the Second Pregnancy of Scar Uterus[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(23):186.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.071]
[4]鲁秋彤.经阴道彩色多普勒超声在诊断剖宫产子宫疤痕妊娠中的 价值研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(05):160.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.058]
 LU Qiu-tong.The Value of Transvaginal Color Doppler Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(23):160.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.058]
[5]张朝霞.瘢痕子宫再次妊娠阴道分娩的可行性及安全性评价[J].医学信息,2018,31(06):104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.06.033]
 ZHANG Zhao-xia.Feasibility and Safety Evaluation of Vaginal Delivery after Re-pregnancy in Scared Uterus[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(23):104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.06.033]
[6]蒋红梅.子宫下段横形环状压迫缝合术治疗前置胎盘剖宫产术中 胎盘剥离面出血的临床研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(07):120.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.040]
 JIANG Hong-mei.Clinical Study on the Treatment of Placental Exfoliation Bleeding in Caesarean Section of Placenta Previa by Transverse Annular Compression Suture of Lower Uterine Segment[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(23):120.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.040]
[7]冉会仁.小剂量舒芬太尼在剖宫产术麻醉中预防寒战及 牵拉痛的疗效评价[J].医学信息,2018,31(08):101.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.08.032]
 RAN Hui-ren.Evaluation of the Efficacy of Low-dose Sufentanil in Preventing Chills and Pulling Pain during Cesarean Section Anesthesia[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(23):101.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.08.032]
[8]岳凤洁.二次剖宫产术后并发症发生情况的临床分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(08):114.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.08.038]
 YUE Feng-jie.Clinical Analysis of Complications after Secondary Cesarean Section[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(23):114.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.08.038]
[9]王玉霞.剖宫产术后子宫疤痕妊娠的临床诊治[J].医学信息,2018,31(10):48.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.10.015]
 WANG Yu-xia.Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Uterine Scar Pregnancy after Cesarean Section[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(23):48.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.10.015]
[10]龙俊青.臀位外倒转术的应用研究[J].医学信息,2019,32(12):61.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.019]
 LONG Jun-qing.Application Study of Breech Presentation[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(23):61.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.019]
[11]刘 礼.影响剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫足月分娩结局的相关因素分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(02):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.02.039]
 LIU Li.Analysis of Related Factors Influencing the Outcome of Full Term Delivery of Scar Uterus after Cesarean Section[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(23):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.02.039]
[12]牛欣荣,郭咏珺,于 丽.瘢痕子宫产妇二次剖宫产与非瘢痕子宫剖宫产并发症发生情况比较[J].医学信息,2022,35(23):122.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.23.024]
 NIU Xin-rong,GUO Yong-jun,YU Li.A Comparative Study on the Complications of Second Cesarean Section in Women with Scarred Uterus and Cesarean Section with Non-scarred Uterus[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(23):122.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.23.024]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01