[1]袁 越.PDCA循环护理联合追踪护理模式在凶险型前置胎盘患者中的应用[J].医学信息,2026,39(01):167-171.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2026.01.032]
　YUAN Yue.Application of PDCA Cycle Nursing Combined with Tracking Nursing Modein Patients with Pernicious Placenta Previa[J].Journal of Medical Information,2026,39(01):167-171.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2026.01.032]
点击复制

PDCA循环护理联合追踪护理模式在凶险型前置胎盘患者中的应用()

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
39卷
期数:
2026年01期
页码:
167-171
栏目:
照护实践信息
出版日期:
2026-01-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of PDCA Cycle Nursing Combined with Tracking Nursing Modein Patients with Pernicious Placenta Previa
文章编号:
1006-1959（2026）01-0167-05
作者:
袁 越
江西省妇幼保健院产科，江西 南昌 330008
Author(s):
YUAN Yue
Department of Obstetrics, Jiangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Nanchang 330008, Jiangxi, China
关键词:
PDCA循环护理; 追踪护理; 凶险型前置胎盘
Keywords:
PDCA cycle nursing;  Tracking nursing;  Pernicious placenta previa
分类号:
R473
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2026.01.032
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 分析PDCA循环护理联合追踪护理模式在凶险型前置胎盘患者中的应用效果。方法 选取2022年1月-2023年12月江西省妇幼保健院收治的60例凶险型前置胎盘孕妇为研究对象，按照随机数字表法将其分为研究组和对照组，每组30例。对照组应用常规护理模式，研究组接受PDCA循环护理联合追踪护理模式。比较两组心理状态（SDS评分、SAS评分）、并发症（输尿管损伤、膀胱损伤、子宫撕裂伤、产后出血）发生率、生活质量、满意度。结果 两组护理后SDS评分、SAS评分均低于护理前，且与对照组比较，研究组护理后SDS评分、SAS评分更低（P＜0.05）；与对照组并发症发生率的23.33%比较，研究组并发症发生率更低，仅为3.33%（P＜0.05）；两组护理后生活质量各维度评分均高于护理前，且与对照组比较，研究组护理后生活质量各维度评分更高（P＜0.05）；与对照组护理满意度的73.33%比较，研究组护理满意度更高，达96.67%（P＜0.05）。结论 PDCA循环护理联合追踪护理模式在凶险型前置胎盘患者中的应用效果确切，可改善患者心理状态和生活质量，提高患者满意度，降低术后并发症发生率，具有临床应用价值。
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the application effect of PDCA cycle nursing combined with tracking nursing mode in patients with pernicious placenta previa. Methods A total of 60 pregnant women with pernicious placenta previa admitted to Jiangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2022 to December 2023 were selected as the research objects, and they were divided into study group and control group according to the random number table method, with 30 pregnant women in each group. The control group received routine nursing mode, and the study group received PDCA cycle nursing combined with follow-up nursing mode. The psychological status (SDS score, SAS score), incidence of complications (ureteral injury, bladder injury, uterine laceration, postpartum hemorrhage), quality of life and satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The SDS score and SAS score of the two groups after nursing were lower than those before nursing, and compared with the control group, the SDS score and SAS score of the study group after nursing were lower (P<0.05). Compared with 23.33% of the complication rate in the control group, the complication rate in the study group was lower, only 3.33% (P<0.05). The scores of each dimension of quality of life in the two groups after nursing were higher than those before nursing, and compared with the control group, the scores of each dimension of quality of life in the study group after nursing were higher (P<0.05). Compared with 73.33% of the control group, the nursing satisfaction of the study group was higher, reaching 96.67% (P<0.05). Conclusion The application effect of PDCA cycle nursing combined with tracking nursing mode in patients with pernicious placenta previa is accurate, which can improve the psychological state and quality of life of patients, improve patient satisfaction, and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. It has clinical application value.

参考文献/References:

[1]Zhao H,Wang Q,Han M,et al.Current state of interventional procedures to treat pernicious placenta previa accompanied by placenta accreta spectrum: A review[J].Medicine (Baltimore),2023,102(37):e34770.[2]叶文馨,余幼芬,贺琰.PDCA护理方式应用于凶险型前置胎盘护理对患者并发症及妊娠结局的影响[J].中国药物与临床,2019,19(19):3434-3436.[3]郑晓玲,徐学军,陈朔晖.凶险型前置胎盘患者行回收式自体输血的护理[J].护理与康复,2020,19(2):39-40.[4]邱雪,李婷婷,李丽.凶险型前置胎盘剖宫产手术的护理配合[J].现代临床护理,2016,15(9):26-28,29.[5]罗小华,成志,黄水芳,等.凶险型与非凶险型前置胎盘对孕妇产后并发症及围产儿的影响[J].湖南师范大学学报(医学版),2019,16(4):26-29.[6]白冰,张增梅,赵海运,等.铅防护用具的设计及在凶险型前置胎盘复合手术患者中的应用[J].中华护理杂志,2018,53(2):251-254.[7]篙毳羽.优质护理服务模式指导下的护理干预措施对凶险性前置胎盘患者的影响分析[J].中国卫生标准管理,2016,7(14):179-180.[8]张蓓,徐慧慧.子宫填塞宫腔一次性压迫球囊在凶险性前置胎盘剖宫产术中应用观察及护理干预[J].贵州医药,2022,46(2):315-316.[9]侯宜萍,周昔红,石理红,等.凶险型前置胎盘植入的影响因素及妊娠结局[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2020,45(9):1074-1081.[10]Gu DF,Deng C.Balloon displacement during caesarean section with pernicious placenta previa: A case report[J].World J Clin Cases,2023,11(36):8574-8580.[11]蒙焕贞,谢红密,张秀英.PDCA护理管理模式在凶险性前置胎盘患者中的应用[J].国际护理学杂志,2021,40(10):1893-1895.[12]禹改君,周丽萍,李小亚.聚焦解决模式护理在凶险性前置胎盘合并胎盘植入患者中的应用效果[J].护理实践与研究,2020,17(24):93-95.[13]冯苗倩,黄伟,肖英,等.预见性护理干预对凶险性前置胎盘剖宫产患者母婴结局的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2019,25(24):29-32.[14]蔡梅香,陆珏敏,孙琪煖,等.手术室快速标准化护理流程对凶险性前置胎盘剖宫产产妇的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2020,26(22):66-68.[15]邓聪.聚焦解决模式护理干预对凶险性前置胎盘患者相关知识认知及分娩结局的影响[J].护理实践与研究,2020,17(10):83-85.[16]付文君,张连琴,刘璐,等.腹主动脉球囊阻断法在凶险性前置胎盘合并胎盘植入剖宫产手术中的应用护理[J].中国实用护理杂志,2018,34(1):30-33.[17]刘新博,程卫平.优质护理干预对凶险性前置胎盘患者及新生儿预后的影响[J].中国实用护理杂志,2018,34(9):701-705.[18]王建英,曹建用,陈芳,等.优质护理服务模式在凶险性前置胎盘患者中的应用效果[J].国际护理学杂志,2018,37(7):914-916.[19]肖雪梅.综合护理干预对凶险性前置胎盘患者妊娠结局的影响[J].实用临床医药杂志,2018,22(14):105-107.[20]徐凌燕,吴天霞,项珍珍,等.凶险性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入患者行髂内动脉球囊置管术的护理体会[J].护理与康复,2018,17(1):51-53.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01