[1]余美英.量化评估策略护理在多发性子宫内膜息肉宫腔镜电切术中的应用效果[J].医学信息,2026,39(01):172-176.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2026.01.033]
　YU Meiying.Application Effect of Quantitative Evaluation Strategy Nursing in Hysteroscopic Electrotomyof Multiple Endometrial Polyps[J].Journal of Medical Information,2026,39(01):172-176.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2026.01.033]
点击复制

量化评估策略护理在多发性子宫内膜息肉宫腔镜电切术中的应用效果()

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
39卷
期数:
2026年01期
页码:
172-176
栏目:
照护实践信息
出版日期:
2026-01-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application Effect of Quantitative Evaluation Strategy Nursing in Hysteroscopic Electrotomyof Multiple Endometrial Polyps
文章编号:
1006-1959（2026）01-0172-05
作者:
余美英
铅山县人民医院妇产科，江西 铅山 334500
Author(s):
YU Meiying
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yanshan County People′s Hospital, Yanshan 334500, Jiangxi, China
关键词:
量化评估策略护理; 多发性子宫内膜息肉; 宫腔镜电切术
Keywords:
Quantitative evaluation strategy nursing;  Multiple endometrial polyps;  Hysteroscopic electrotomy
分类号:
R473.71
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2026.01.033
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨量化评估策略护理在多发性子宫内膜息肉宫腔镜电切术中的应用效果。方法 选择2020年1月-2023年12月在铅山县人民医院进行宫腔镜电切术治疗的60例多发性子宫内膜息肉患者为研究对象，按照随机数字表法分为对照组和研究组，每组30例。对照组给予常规护理，研究组在常规组基础上予以量化评估策略护理。比较两组护理满意度、相关临床指标（首次下床时间、术后1天疼痛程度、总住院时间）、生活质量（生理功能、情感职能、社会功能、一般健康）、心理状况（SDS评分、SAS评分）。结果 研究组护理满意度为96.67%，高于对照组的73.33%（P＜0.05）。研究组的首次下床时间、总住院时间短于对照组，术后1天疼痛程度评分低于对照组（P＜0.05）。研究组护理后生活质量评分高于对照组（P＜0.05）。研究组护理后SAS评分、SDS评分低于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论 量化评估策略护理在多发性子宫内膜息肉宫腔镜电切术中的应用效果确切，可改善患者心理状态与相关临床指标，提升护理满意度和生活质量。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the application effect of quantitative evaluation strategy nursing in hysteroscopic electrotomy of multiple endometrial polyps. Methods From January 2020 to December 2023, 60 patients with multiple endometrial polyps treated by hysteroscopic electrotomy in Yanshan County People′s Hospital were selected as the research objects. According to the random number table method, they were divided into control group and study group, with 30 patients in each group. The control group was given routine nursing, and the study group was given quantitative evaluation strategy nursing on the basis of the routine group. The nursing satisfaction, related clinical indexes (time to first ambulation, pain degree on the first day after operation, total hospitalization time), quality of life (physiological function, emotional function, social function, general health), mental status (SDS score, SAS score) were compared between the two groups. Results The nursing satisfaction of the study group was 96.67%, which was higher than 73.33% of the control group (P<0.05). The time to first ambulation and total hospitalization time in the study group were shorter than those in the control group, and the pain score on the first day after operation was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The quality of life score of the study group after nursing was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). After nursing, the SAS score and SDS score of the study group were lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of quantitative evaluation strategy nursing in hysteroscopic electrotomy of multiple endometrial polyps is effective, which can improve their mental status and related clinical indexes, and improve nursing satisfaction and quality of life.

参考文献/References:

[1]过佳俊,苏滢,郑慧,等.基于量化评估策略的手术室护理管理在急诊剖宫产孕妇中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2023,29(2):126-128.[2]左文定,刘丽云,邓小娟.基于量化评估策略的手术室护理在膝关节骨关节炎患者中的应用[J].护理实践与研究,2023,20(5):643-647.[3]刘啸辰.量化评估策略指导下手术室护理在冠脉搭桥术围术期老年冠心病患者中的应用效果[J].保健医学研究与实践,2023,20(6):81-84.[4]方勇霞,陈青,桑丽晓.基于量化评估策略的预防性护理对早发型重度子痫前期患者术后LEDVT风险的影响[J].检验医学与临床,2022,19(12):1690-1692.[5]安莉.基于量化评估策略干预模式对胃癌术后患者胃肠功能、生活质量的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2022,41(14):2630-2633.[6]徐玲玲.量化评估策略指导下的预防性护理干预在腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者中的应用效果评价[J].中国数字医学,2019,14(10):107-109.[7]陈洁,孙丽梅,程大鹏,等.精细化护理在子宫内膜息肉宫腔镜电切术病人中的应用[J].护理研究,2021,35(13):2440-2442.[8]陈辰.量化评估护理干预对预防心胸外科手术患者心律失常及其满意度的影响[J].医学临床研究,2018,35(5):1030-1032.[9]李珺,巨丽萍.手术室量化评估对乳腺癌血清内皮素、一氧化氮和C反应蛋白水平的影响[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2020,27(11):1385-1388.[10]孟雅,孙敏,王娅,等.基于量化评估策略下的延续性护理对老年慢性病患者的用药安全、生活质量及自我管理能力的影响[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2022,31(19):2738-2741.[11]王玲玲.基于综合护理的腔镜手术对子宫内膜息肉的干预作用[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2018,23(6):447,454.[12]周静,丁小萍,陈君霞.基于目标管理优化的护理路径在宫腔镜下子宫内膜息肉切除术中的应用[J].中华全科医学,2019,17(12):2147-2150.[13]方勇霞,陈青,桑丽晓.基于量化评估策略的预防性护理对早发型重度子痫前期患者术后LEDVT风险的影响[J].检验医学与临床,2022,19(12):1690-1692.[14]贾玉蕾,延丽霞,张则,等.基于量化评估策略下的心理护理干预对妇科恶性肿瘤化疗患者情绪状态及应对方式的影响[J].国际精神病学杂志,2018,45(2):357-360.[15]孙琼,姜慧萍,刘静,等.综合干预结合信息支持在子宫内膜息肉TCRP围手术期中的应用[J].广东医学,2019,40(22):3193-3197.[16]王雪梅,刘莉.手术室量化评估策略应用于早期宫颈癌的临床效果及对术后康复指标的影响[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2021,28(3):342-345.[17]曲延丽,刘东彦.围术期优质护理对行宫腔镜切除子宫内膜炎性息肉患者的临床辅助疗效[J].国际护理学杂志,2019,38(11):1657-1660.[18]沈海琴,林文颖.精细化手术室护理对宫腔镜下电切手术患者体温控制和应激反应的影响[J].山西医药杂志,2022,51(23):2746-2749.[19]钟慈新,刘海英,古丽华,等.优质护理对重度宫腔粘连宫腔镜电切术后患者生活质量及疼痛的影响[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2018,27(23):2607-2610.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01