[1]陈加富,陈新生.右正中神经电刺激对高血压脑出血后昏迷患者早期促醒治疗的研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(22):85-88.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.22.023]
 CHEN Jia-fu,CHEN Xin-sheng.Study of the Clinical Effect of the Early Right Median Nerve Electrical Stimulation to Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage-induced Coma[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(22):85-88.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.22.023]
点击复制

右正中神经电刺激对高血压脑出血后昏迷患者早期促醒治疗的研究()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
31卷
期数:
2018年22期
页码:
85-88
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2018-11-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study of the Clinical Effect of the Early Right Median Nerve Electrical Stimulation to Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage-induced Coma
文章编号:
1006-1959(2018)22-0085-04
作者:
陈加富陈新生
(安徽医科大学附属安庆医院神经外科,安徽 安庆 246003)
Author(s):
CHEN Jia-fuCHEN Xin-sheng
(Department of Neurosurgery,Anqing Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University,Anqing 246003,Anhui,China)
关键词:
右正中神经电刺激高血压脑出血昏迷促醒脑电图评分
Keywords:
Right median nerve stimulationHypertensive cerebral hemorrhageComaWakefulness EEG score
分类号:
R651.1+2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.22.023
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨早期右正中神经电刺激对于高血压脑出血后昏迷患者的促醒效果以及对其远期康复的影响。方法 选择2016年1月~2018年6月安徽医科大学附属安庆医院收治的高血压脑出血性昏迷患者41例,按照随机数字表法分为对照组(n=20)和实验组(n=21),对照组给予常规临床治疗,实验组在此基础上增加右正中神经电刺激治疗。通过比较两组患者治疗前后的脑电图(EEG)评分、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)、残疾分级量表(DRS)评分、NICU住院日以及6个月时两组患者的苏醒率,了解早期右正中神经电刺激对于高血压脑出血性昏迷患者的疗效。结果 在接受不同治疗措施后,实验组NICU住院日低于对照组,6个月的苏醒率高于对照组,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在治疗后的不同时间维度,实验组的EEG评分,GCS评分,DRS评分均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 右正中神经电刺激治疗可提高HICH昏迷患者苏醒率,减少NICU平均住院日,改善患者预后,提高生存质量。该方案经济有效,操作简便,作为一种早期临床辅助促醒治疗措施,值得临床借鉴应用。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the effect of early right median nerve stimulation on the recovery of coma patients after hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage and the effect on its long-term rehabilitation.Methods From January 2016 to June 2018, 41 patients with hypertensive hemorrhagic coma were selected from Anqing Hospital affiliated to Anhui Medical University and were divided into two groups: control group(n=20) and experimental group(n=21) according to the method of random number table.The control group was treated with routine clinical therapy, and the experimental group was treated with right median nerve stimulation on this basis.By comparing the electroencephalogram (EEG) scores before and after treatment in the two groups, the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), the Disability Rating Scale (DRS) score, the NICU hospitalization day, and the awake rate of the two groups of patients at 6 months, The effect of right median nerve stimulation on patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhagic coma.Results After receiving different treatment measures, NICU in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, and the recovery rate in 6 months was higher than that in the control group,the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).The scores of EEG, GCS and DRS in the experimental group were better than those in the control group in different time dimensions after treatment,the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Right median nerve electrical stimulation can improve the recovery rate of HICH coma patients, reduce the average hospitalization days of NICU patients, improve the prognosis of patients and improve the quality of life.The measurement is economical, effective and easy to operate. As an early clinical assistant therapy, it is worthy of clinical reference.

参考文献/References:


[1]Feigin VL,Krishnamurthi RV,Parmar P,et al.Update on the Global Burden of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke in 1990-2013:The GBD 2013 Study[J].Neuroepidemiology,2015,45(3):161-176.
[2]Wannez S,Gosseries O,Azzolini D,et al.Prevalence of coma-recovery scale-revised signs of consciousness in patients in minimally conscious state[J].Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 2017(4):1-10.
[3]钟四海.高血压性脑出血CT检查的诊断价值及特点分析[J].临床合理用药杂志,2018(9):104-105.
[4]Rae-grant AD,Barbour PJ,Reed J.Development of a novel EEG rating scale for head injury using dichotomous variables[J].Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,1991,79(5):349 -357.
[5]Zhen F,Du Q.Mechanisms responsible for the effect of median nerve electrical stimulation on traumatic brain injury-induced coma:orexin-A-mediated N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit NR1 upregulation[J].Neural Regeneration Research,2016,11(6):951-956.
[6]Rizoli SB,Jaja BN,Di BA,et al.Catecholamines as outcome markers in isolated traumatic brain injury: the COMA-TBI study[J].Critical Care,2017,21(1):37-47.
[7]Andriessen TM,Horn J,Franschman G,et al.Epidemiology, severity classification, and outcome of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury:a prospective multicenter study[J].J Neurotrauma, 2011,28(10):2019-2031.
[8]Hadanny A,Efrati S.The efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in traumatic brain injury[J].Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics,2016,16(4):359-360.
[9]Harris GF,Miliar EA,Hemmy DC,et al.Neuroelectric Stimulation in Cerebral Palsy:Long-Term Quantitative Assessment[J].Stereotactic & Functional Neurosurgery,1993,61(2):49-59.
[10]Jin L,Lei W,Guoyi G,et al.Right Median Nerve Electrical Stimulation for Acute Traumatic Coma Patients[J].Journal of Neurotrauma,2015,32(20):1584-1589.
[11]Yokoyama TK.Right median nerve electrical stimulation for comatose patients[J].The Society for Treatment of Coma,1996,(5):117-122.
[12]Xiang W,Chao Z,Feng J,et al.Right median nerve electrical stimulation for acute traumatic coma (the Asia Coma Electrical Stimulation trial):study protocol for a randomised controlled trial[J].Trials,2017,18(1):311.
[13]Peri CV,Shaffrey ME,Farace E,et al.Pilot study of electrical stimulation on median nerve in comatose severe brain injured patients:3-month outcome[J].Brain Injury,2001,15(10):903-910.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘伟兰,罗丽珍.围手术护理干预在高血压脑出血小骨窗开颅血肿清除术中的效果观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(02):166.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.02.064]
 LIU Wei-lan,LUO Li-zhen.Effect of Perioperative Nursing Intervention on Craniotomy Hematoma Clearance of Small Bone Window in Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(22):166.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.02.064]
[2]韩 冬.小骨窗血肿清除术与微创穿刺血肿引流术治疗 高血压脑出血的效果比较[J].医学信息,2018,31(05):105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.035]
 HAN Dong.Comparison of Small Window Hematoma Clearance and Minimally Invasive Hematoma Drainage in the Treatment of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(22):105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.035]
[3]雷 明.微创穿刺引流联合开颅血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血 并发脑疝临床效果观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(07):89.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.028]
 LEI Ming.Clinical Effect of Minimally Invasive Puncture Drainage Combined with Craniotomy Hematoma in the Treatment of Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage Complicated with Cerebral Hernia[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(22):89.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.028]
[4]陈春香,顾宇丹.循证护理干预对高血压脑出血与患者心理状态恢复及 并发症的影响[J].医学信息,2018,31(14):180.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.14.057]
 CHEN Chun-xiang,GU Yu-dan.Effect of Evidence-based Nursing Intervention on Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage and Recovery of Patients' Psychological State and Complications[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(22):180.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.14.057]
[5]袁新春,董 伟,潘泰峰.血清D-二聚体水平与高血压脑出血患者病情严重程度及术后预后的关系[J].医学信息,2022,35(13):165.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.13.041]
 YUAN Xin-chun,DONG Wei,PAN Tai-feng.The Relationship Between Serum D-dimer Level and the Severity and Postoperative Prognosis of Patients with Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(22):165.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.13.041]
[6]王春城.神经内镜辅助对高血压脑出血中患者神经缺损及安全性的影响[J].医学信息,2019,32(08):139.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.08.041]
 WANG Chun-cheng.Effect of Neuroendoscopy on Neurological Deficit and Safety in Patients with Hypertensive Brain Hemorrhage[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(22):139.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.08.041]
[7]刘 宏,吴政俊,何明方.开颅减压结合脑室外引流术对高血压脑出血破入脑室 感染及预后的影响[J].医学信息,2019,32(12):112.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.035]
 LIU Hong,WU Zheng-jun,HE Ming-fang.Effect of Craniotomy and Decompression Combined with Extraventricular Drainage on Cerebral Ventricular Infection and Prognosis of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(22):112.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.035]
[8]韩 晋,陈淑媛,董瑞宾,等.神经生长因子与盐酸氟桂利嗪联合治疗高血压脑出血的疗效[J].医学信息,2019,32(21):81.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.21.025]
 HAN Jin,CHEN Shu-yuan,DONG Rui-bin,et al.Effect of Nerve Growth Factor Combined with Flunarizine Hydrochloride on Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(22):81.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.21.025]
[9]吴六仔.纳络酮联合局部亚低温治疗高血压脑出血的疗效及对患者神经功能恢复、认知改善的影响[J].医学信息,2022,35(16):125.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.16.031]
 WU Liu-zi.Effect of Naloxone Combined with Local Mild Hypothermia on Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage and its Effect on Neurological Function Recovery and Cognitive Improvement[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(22):125.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.16.031]
[10]赵 雷,封浩野.血肿穿刺引流术与开颅手术治疗高血压脑出血疗效比较[J].医学信息,2021,34(12):136.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.12.036]
 ZHAO Lei,FENG Hao-ye.Comparison of Curative Effect Between Hematoma Puncture Drainage and Craniotomy in the Treatment of Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(22):136.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.12.036]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-12-03