[1]王 梅.2016年~2020年天津市河北区医疗机构消毒质量监测结果分析[J].医学信息,2021,34(13):146-148.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.13.040]
　WANG Mei.Analysis of the Results of Disinfection Quality Monitoring in Medical Institutions in Hebei District,Tianjin from 2016 to 2020[J].Medical Information,2021,34(13):146-148.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.13.040]
点击复制

2016年~2020年天津市河北区医疗机构消毒质量监测结果分析()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年13期
页码:
146-148
栏目:
调查分析
出版日期:
2021-07-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of the Results of Disinfection Quality Monitoring in Medical Institutions in Hebei District,Tianjin from 2016 to 2020
文章编号:
1006-1959（2021）13-0146-03
作者:
王 梅
（天津市河北区疾病预防控制中心，天津 300150）
Author(s):
WANG Mei
(Tianjin Hebei District Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Tianjin 300150,China)
关键词:
医疗机构; 消毒质量; 医务人员; 手卫生; 高压蒸汽灭菌器
Keywords:
Medical institutions; Disinfection quality; Medical staff; Hand hygiene; Autoclave
分类号:
R187
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.13.040
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 了解天津市河北区各级医疗机构消毒质量情况，为提高医疗机构消毒质量提供参考依据。方法 按照GB15982-2012的要求，通过现场采样，对天津市河北区2016年~2020年各级医疗机构进行消毒质量监测。结果 2016年~2020年共采集监测样品3154份，合格样品3083份，合格率为97.75%；不同年份的监测合格率比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；不同监测项目中，医务人员手合格率最低（95.14%），其次为高压蒸汽灭菌器（95.95%），使用中的消毒剂合格率最高，为100.00%，不同监测项目合格率比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；公立医疗机构监测合格率高于非公立医疗机构，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；不同级别医疗机构监测合格率比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 天津市河北区辖区医疗机构消毒质量效果总体较好，但在医务人员手卫生、高压蒸汽灭菌器等方面仍需加强管理，规范消毒工作，提高消毒质量。
Abstract:
Objective To understand the disinfection quality of medical institutions at all levels in Hebei District, Tianjin, and provide a reference for improving the disinfection quality of medical institutions.Methods According to the requirements of GB15982-2012, through on-site sampling, the disinfection quality monitoring of medical institutions at all levels in Hebei District, Tianjin City from 2016 to 2020 was carried out.Results A total of 3154 monitoring samples and 3083 qualified samples were collected from 2016 to 2020, with a pass rate of 97.75%;Compared with the monitoring qualification rate in different years, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);Among different monitoring items, medical staff had the lowest pass rate (95.14%), followed by high-pressure steam sterilizers (95.95%), and the highest pass rate of disinfectants in use was 100.00%. Comparing the pass rates of different monitoring items,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);The monitoring qualification rate of public medical institutions was higher than that of non-public medical institutions,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);Comparing the monitoring qualification rate of different levels of medical institutions, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion The disinfection quality of medical institutions in Hebei District of Tianjin is generally good. However, it is still necessary to strengthen management, standardize disinfection work, and improve disinfection quality in terms of hand hygiene of medical staff and high-pressure steam sterilizers.

参考文献/References:

[1]李雪梅,狄佳,冯诚怿.某三甲医院消毒灭菌连续三年主动监测效果分析[J].医学信息,2019,32(10):126-128. [2]中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.GB50333-2013医院洁净手术部建筑技术规范[S].2014. [3]中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.GB15982-2012医院消毒卫生标准[S].2012. [4]中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.GB/T30690-2014小型压力蒸汽灭菌器灭菌效果监测方法和评价要求[S].2014. [5]中华人民共和国卫生部.WS310.3-2016医院消毒供应中心第3部分：清洗消毒及灭菌效果监测标准[S].2016. [6]王金柱,房云霞,孙慧,等.2014-2018年天津市河东区医疗机构消毒效果监测分析[J].医学动物防制,2020,36(2):197-198. [7]刘军,费春楠,纪学悦,等.2016-2018年天津市各级医疗机构消毒质量监测分析[J].现代预防医学,2019,35(7):3233-3236． [8]李洁,汪峰,何红伟,等.2014-2017年许昌市医疗机构消毒质量监测分析[J].中国消毒学杂志,2019,36(12):936-938． [9]王冲,吴起新,陆墨原,等.2016-2018年南京市不同级别医疗机构消毒质量监测结果分析[J].中国消毒学杂志,2018,35(12): 948-950． [10]张继涛,贺洪国,王涛,等.2014年-2018年北京市昌平区医疗机构消毒效果监测分析[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2020,30(17):2167-2169. [11]冯竞,鲜洪,朱双.2015-2017年绵竹市医疗机构消毒质量监测结果分析[J].职业卫生与病伤,2019,34(1):43-45,49. [12]李萍,张端强,汤晨,等.2015-2017年常州市武进区医疗机构消毒质量监测结果分析[J].环境卫生学杂志,2020,10(2):155-159.

相似文献/References:

[1]乔 书.网络时代下医疗机构防控网络舆情突发事件的应对措施[J].医学信息,2018,31(02):16.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.02.007]
　QIAO Shu.Countermeasures of Medical Institutions in Preventing and Controling Internet Public Opinions and Emergencies under the Internet Age[J].Medical Information,2018,31(13):16.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.02.007]
[2]肖 霖,安 寒,邓小华.2014~2016年成都市托幼机构消毒质量监测分析[J].医学信息,2019,32(08):146.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.08.044]
　XIAO Lin,AN Han,DENG Xiao-hua.Monitoring and Analysis of Disinfection Quality of Kindergarten Institutions in Chengdu from 2014 to 2016[J].Medical Information,2019,32(13):146.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.08.044]
[3]常路路,王义围,李 军.承德市下辖8个县医疗卫生机构发展趋势及公平性研究[J].医学信息,2020,33(18):122.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.18.039]
　CHANG Lu-lu,WANG Yi-wei,LI Jun.Research on the Development Trend and Equity of Medical and Health Institutions in 8 Counties in Chengde City[J].Medical Information,2020,33(13):122.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.18.039]
[4]王 帅,罗心源,雷 茵,等.贵州省互联网+医疗健康应用状况调查[J].医学信息,2020,33(21):118.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.21.036]
　WANG Shuai,LUO Xin-yuan,LEI Yin,et al.Survey of Internet+ Medical and Health Applications in Guizhou Province[J].Medical Information,2020,33(13):118.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.21.036]
[5]兰艳芳,陈 静,高哲敏,等.2017-2021年沧州市医疗机构信息报告质量管理现况[J].医学信息,2024,37(15):33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.15.007]
　LAN Yan-fang,CHEN Jing,GAO Zhe-min,et al.Current Situation of Information Report Quality Management of Medical Institutions in Cangzhou City from 2017 to 2021[J].Medical Information,2024,37(13):33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.15.007]
[6]刘小明.医疗机构HIV初筛阳性报告流行病学调查分析[J].医学信息,2024,37(19):58.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.19.009]
　LIU Xiaoming.Epidemiological Investigation and Analysis of HIV Screening Positive Report in Medical Institutions[J].Medical Information,2024,37(13):58.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.19.009]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01