[1]高冬冬.责任制整体护理联合多元化教育对瘢痕子宫妊娠再次剖宫产产妇负性情绪及妊娠结局的影响[J].医学信息,2022,35(18):190-192.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.18.053]
 GAO Dong-gong.The Effect of Responsibility System Holistic Nursing Combined with Diversified Education on Negative Emotion and Pregnancy Outcome of Re-cesarean Section Women with Scarred Uterus Pregnancy[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(18):190-192.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.18.053]
点击复制

责任制整体护理联合多元化教育对瘢痕子宫妊娠再次剖宫产产妇负性情绪及妊娠结局的影响()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2022年18期
页码:
190-192
栏目:
护理研究
出版日期:
2022-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Effect of Responsibility System Holistic Nursing Combined with Diversified Education on Negative Emotion and Pregnancy Outcome of Re-cesarean Section Women with Scarred Uterus Pregnancy
文章编号:
1006-1959(2022)18-0190-03
作者:
高冬冬
(金溪县中医院门急诊,江西 抚州 344800)
Author(s):
GAO Dong-gong
(Emergency Outpatient of Jinxi County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Fuzhou 344800,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
瘢痕子宫再次剖宫产责任制整体护理多元化教育
Keywords:
Scarred uterusCesarean section againResponsibility system holistic nursingDiversified education
分类号:
R473.71
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.18.053
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨责任制整体护理联合多元化教育对瘢痕子宫妊娠再次剖宫产产妇负性情绪及妊娠结局的影响。方法 选取2019年1月-2021年8月我院收治的瘢痕子宫妊娠行再次剖宫产的产妇76例。以随机数字表法将分为妊娠A组和妊娠B组,每组38例。妊娠A组在围产期护理干预中给予常规护理联合多元化教育,妊娠B组给予责任制整体护理联合多元化教育。比较两组产妇干预前后负性情绪改善情况、妊娠结局、产后24h VAS评分、产后48h血清泌乳素(PRL)水平、产后至首次母乳喂养时间,以及对围产期护理干预的总体评价。结果 两组干预后负性情绪评分低于干预前,妊娠B组低于妊娠A组(P<0.05);妊娠B组不良妊娠结局发生率低于妊娠A组,产后24h VAS评分低于妊娠A组,产后48h PRL水平高于妊娠A组,产后至首次母乳喂养时间短于妊娠A组,总体评价高于妊娠A组(P<0.05)。结论 行二次剖宫产分娩的瘢痕子宫妊娠产妇采取责任制整体护理联合多元化教育干预模式,有利于减轻产妇负性情绪,减少不良妊娠结局,改善预后,且该护理干预模式获得产妇更高的总体评价。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the effect of responsibility system holistic nursing combined with diversified education on negative emotion and pregnancy outcome of re-cesarean section women with scarred uterus pregnancy.Methods A total of 76 pregnant women with scarred uterus who underwent cesarean section again in our hospital from January 2019 to August 2021 were selected. They were divided into pregnancy group A and pregnancy group B by random number table method, with 38 cases in each group. Pregnancy group A was given routine nursing combined with diversified education in perinatal nursing intervention, and pregnancy group B was given responsibility system holistic nursing combined with diversified education. The improvement of negative emotion, pregnancy outcome, VAS score at 24 h postpartum, serum prolactin (PRL) level at 48 h postpartum, time from postpartum to first breastfeeding, and overall evaluation of perinatal nursing intervention were compared between the two groups.Results The negative emotion scores of the two groups after intervention were lower than those before intervention, and the pregnancy group B was lower than the pregnancy group A(P<0.05). The incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in group B was lower than that in group A,the VAS score at 24 h after delivery was lower than that in pregnancy group A, the PRL level at 48 h after delivery was higher than that in pregnancy group A, and the time from delivery to the first breastfeeding was shorter than that in pregnancy group A(P<0.05). The overall evaluation of pregnancy group B was higher than that of pregnancy group A(P<0.05).Conclusion The responsibility system holistic nursing combined with diversified education intervention model is conducive to reducing maternal negative emotions, reducing adverse pregnancy outcomes and improving prognosis in pregnant women with scar uterus undergoing secondary cesarean section, and the nursing intervention model has a higher overall evaluation.

参考文献/References:

[1]王柯兰,叶小琴,毛永兵.瘢痕子宫再次妊娠患者经阴道分娩成功率的影响因素分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2021,36(4):880-884.[2]陈铭红,冯世萍,刘嘉.医护一体化管理在瘢痕子宫再次妊娠阴道分娩中的临床应用[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2019,11(10):64-67.[3]王灿辉,罗丽琼,郭悦慈,等.助产士干预对瘢痕子宫再次妊娠分娩结局影响研究[J].中国性科学,2019,28(7):73-76.[4]任春丽,唐兴国,张玉芳,等.二孩后瘢痕子宫高龄孕妇再妊娠并发症发生情况分析[J].河北医学,2020,26(11):1919-1923.[5]王皎皎.剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕部妊娠患者的诊治与护理进展评价[J].检验医学与临床,2017,14(2):366-367.[6]朱进璐,许张晔.剖宫产子宫瘢痕缺损程度与再妊娠分娩方式及母婴结局的相关性[J].中国妇幼保健,2021,36(6):1229-1231.[7]徐颖芬.助产士门诊干预对首次剖宫产再次妊娠孕妇分娩结局的影响研究[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2017,9(6):27-29.[8]朱玮,陈焱,陆婷,等.助产士连续性服务模式在瘢痕子宫孕妇阴道分娩中的应用[J].解放军护理杂志,2019,36(7):79-82.[9]陈羽保,苏银利,陈丹,等.剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠患者心理体验的质性研究[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2018,24(18):71-73.[10]周金英,孙杨芳,刘蓓,等.二胎瘢痕子宫孕妇孕期抑郁状况及影响因素分析[J].中华全科医学,2021,19(7):1179-1181,1235.[11]何敏芝,李益民,汤阿毛,等.瘢痕子宫再次妊娠孕产妇及其配偶围生期心理状况研究[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2018,29(10):1248-1251.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘 礼.影响剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫足月分娩结局的相关因素分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(02):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.02.039]
 LIU Li.Analysis of Related Factors Influencing the Outcome of Full Term Delivery of Scar Uterus after Cesarean Section[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(18):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.02.039]
[2]薛志雯.瘢痕子宫再次妊娠选择不同分娩方式的效果分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(04):186.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.071]
 XUE Zhi-wen.Analysis of Different Delivery Modes in the Second Pregnancy of Scar Uterus[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(18):186.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.071]
[3]张朝霞.瘢痕子宫再次妊娠阴道分娩的可行性及安全性评价[J].医学信息,2018,31(06):104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.06.033]
 ZHANG Zhao-xia.Feasibility and Safety Evaluation of Vaginal Delivery after Re-pregnancy in Scared Uterus[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(18):104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.06.033]
[4]岳凤洁.二次剖宫产术后并发症发生情况的临床分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(08):114.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.08.038]
 YUE Feng-jie.Clinical Analysis of Complications after Secondary Cesarean Section[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(18):114.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.08.038]
[5]宋晓娟.COOK水囊在瘢痕子宫足月妊娠经阴道分娩中的应用[J].医学信息,2018,31(21):112.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.21.031]
 SONG Xiao-juan.Application of COOK Water Sac in Vaginal Delivery of Full-term Pregnancy of ScarredUterus[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(18):112.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.21.031]
[6]燕素芳,戚秀娟.腹腔镜在瘢痕子宫全子宫切除术中的应用[J].医学信息,2019,32(22):100.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.22.031]
 YAN Su-fang,QI Xiu-juan.Laparoscopy in the Treatment of Scar Uterus Hysterectomy[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(18):100.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.22.031]
[7]杨 华,陈海凤.剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫再次妊娠阴道分娩的临床研究[J].医学信息,2021,34(24):87.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.24.019]
 YANG Hua,CHEN Hai-feng.Clinical Study on Subsequent Pregnancy of Vaginal Delivery with Scar Uterus After Cesarean Section[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(18):87.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.24.019]
[8]牛欣荣,郭咏珺,于 丽.瘢痕子宫产妇二次剖宫产与非瘢痕子宫剖宫产并发症发生情况比较[J].医学信息,2022,35(23):122.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.23.024]
 NIU Xin-rong,GUO Yong-jun,YU Li.A Comparative Study on the Complications of Second Cesarean Section in Women with Scarred Uterus and Cesarean Section with Non-scarred Uterus[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(18):122.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.23.024]
[9]熊文红,李木琴,刘 英.优质护理结合全程胎心监护对瘢痕子宫再次妊娠产妇阴道分娩成功率及母婴结局的影响[J].医学信息,2022,35(23):189.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.23.042]
 XIONG Wen-hong,LI Mu-qin,LIU Ying.Effect of High Quality Nursing Combined with Whole Course Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring on the Success Rate of Vaginal Delivery and Maternal and Infant Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Scar Uterus Repregnancy[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(18):189.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.23.042]
[10]王金英.卡前列甲酯栓联合麦角新碱预防瘢痕子宫剖宫产产后出血的临床效果及安全性[J].医学信息,2023,36(23):107.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.23.027]
 WANG Jin-ying.Clinical Effect and Safety of Methyl Carprost Suppositories Combined with Ergonovine in Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage of Cesarean Section of Scar Uterus[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(18):107.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.23.027]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01