[1]黄虹蓉,林钟石,臧德跃,等.经戊二醛固定的牛心包生物瓣膜材料的生物安全性评价[J].医学信息,2022,35(24):95-101.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.24.018]
　HUANG Hong-rong,LIN Zhong-shi,ZANG De-yue,et al.The Biosafety Evaluation of Glutaraldehyde-fixed Bovine Pericardium Biovalve Materials[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(24):95-101.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.24.018]
点击复制

经戊二醛固定的牛心包生物瓣膜材料的生物安全性评价()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2022年24期
页码:
95-101
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2022-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Biosafety Evaluation of Glutaraldehyde-fixed Bovine Pericardium Biovalve Materials
文章编号:
1006-1959（2022）24-0095-07
作者:
黄虹蓉; 林钟石; 臧德跃; 等
（深圳市医疗器械检测中心体外诊断试剂检测部1，无源医疗器械检测部2，广东 深圳 518000）
Author(s):
HUANG Hong-rong; LIN Zhong-shi; ZANG De-yue; et al.
(Department of In-vitro Diagnostic Reagent Testing1,Department of Passive Medical Device Testing2,Shenzhen Testing Center of Medical Divices,Shenzhen 518000,Guangdong,China)
关键词:
生物安全性; 戊二醛; 牛心包; 生物瓣膜
Keywords:
Biological safety; Glutaraldehyde; Bovine pericardium; Biological valve
分类号:
R318
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.24.018
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 对经戊二醛固定的牛心包瓣膜材料进行生物安全性评价，为其在未来的临床使用中提供安全有效的依据。方法 依据GB/T 16886/ISO 10993系列标准要求，选择体外细胞毒性试验噻唑盐比色法（MTT）、皮肤致敏试验、皮内反应试验、热原试验、急性全身毒性试验、遗传毒性组合试验（Ames 试验、体外小鼠淋巴瘤 tk 试验和体外哺乳动物染色体损伤的细胞遗传毒评估试验）和溶血试验等对经戊二醛固定的牛心包瓣膜材料进行生物安全性评价，通过细胞存活率、溶血率的计算结果及对动物皮肤红斑和水肿反应、刺激反应、毒性反应的观察以及对潜在的致突变性和致癌性的评估，判断牛心包瓣膜材料的生物安全性。结果 牛心包瓣膜材料的细胞存活率为73.60%；皮肤致敏反应等级为0级；皮内反应总平均记分为0；急性全身毒性试验浸提液组与对照组小鼠体重无显著性差异；热原试验家兔的体温升高均低于0.6 ℃；溶血率为1.26%；Ames试验浸提液组回变菌落数均未比阴性组回变菌落数增加1倍或者1倍以上；MLA试验浸提液组MF值与阴性对照相比无超过126×10-6的增长；体外哺乳动物染色体损伤的细胞遗传毒评估试验浸提液组染色体结构畸变率与阴性对照无显著性差异。结论 经戊二醛固定的牛心包瓣膜材料符合国家医疗器械标准的要求，表现出良好的生物安全性。
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the biosafety of glutaraldehyde-fixed bovine pericardial valve materials and provide a safe and effective basis for their future clinical use.Methods According to the requirements of GB/T 16886/ISO 10993 series standards, the biological safety of glutaraldehyde-fixed bovine pericardial valve materials was evaluated by MTT assay, skin sensitization test, intradermal reaction test, pyrogen test, acute systemic toxicity test, genetic toxicity combination test (Ames test, in vitro mouse lymphoma tk test and in vitro mammalian chromosome damage cell genetic toxicity assessment test) and hemolysis test. Through the calculation results of cell survival rate and hemolysis rate, the observation of animal skin erythema and edema reaction, stimulation reaction, toxicity reaction and the evaluation of potential mutagenicity and carcinogenicity, the biosafety of bovine pericardial valve material was judged.Results The cell survival rate of bovine pericardial valve material was 73.60%. The skin sensitization reaction grade was 0; the total average score of intradermal reaction was 0; there was no significant difference in body weight between the extract group and the control group in acute systemic toxicity test. The temperature rise of rabbits in pyrogen test was lower than 0.6 ℃. Hemolysis rate was 1.26%. The number of revertant colonies in the Ames test extract group did not increase by one time or more than one time compared with the negative group. The MF value of the MLA test extract group did not increase by more than 126×10-6 compared with the negative control; cytogenetic toxicity assessment of mammalian chromosome damage in vitroThere was no significant difference in chromosome structural aberration rate between the extract group and the negative control.Conclusion The glutaraldehyde-fixed bovine pericardial valve materials meets the requirements of national medical device standards and shows good biosafety.

参考文献/References:

[1]范阜东,汤鑫龙,周庆,等.50~60岁二尖瓣患者机械瓣与生物瓣植入术后临床疗效对比:倾向性评分匹配研究[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2021,1(1):1-5.[2]王寅,董念国.我国生物瓣临床应用现状与思考[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2018,25(6):458-460.[3]Tirone David.How to decide between a bioprosthetic and mechanical valve[J].Can J Cardiol,2021,37(7):1121-1123.[4]吴泽斌,金昌,王丽珍,等.经导管瓣膜瓣叶材料力学性能研究[C]//第十二届全国生物力学学术会议暨第十四届全国生物流变学学术会议会议论文摘要汇编.2018:114.[5]Song M,Tang Z,Liu Y,et al.Yak Pericardium as an Alternative Biomaterial for Transcatheter Heart Valves[J].Front Bioeng Biotechnol,2021,9:766991.[6]Luehr M,Wahlers T.Use of the BalMedic bovine pericardial bioprosthetic valve in China: a new light on the horizon?[J].Annals of Translational Medicine,2021,9(6):444.[7]Rassoli A,Li YM,Bao XH,et al.Donkey pericardium as a select sourcing to manufacture percutaneous heart valves: Decellularization has not yet demonstrated any clear cut advantage to glutaraldehyde treatment[J].Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices,2019,4(C):100029.[8]杨文笑,曲道旭,刘天起,等.戊二醛鞣制驴心包作为一种新型生物瓣膜材料的生物相容性研究[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2016,10(16):2434-2437.[9]GB/T16886.12-2017,医疗器械生物学评价第12部分:样品制备与参照材料[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017.[10]GB/T16886.5-2017,医疗器械生物学评价第5部分:体外细胞毒性试验[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017.[11]GB/T16886.10-2017,医疗器械生物学评价第10部分:刺激与皮肤致敏试验[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017.[12]林曦,张卫达,王晓武,等.TritonX-100、环氧氯丙烷联合改性处理牛颈静脉带瓣管道的体内外生物相容性研究[J].中国现代医学杂志,2011,21(35):4405-4408.[13]GB/T16886.4-2003,医疗器械生物学评价第4部分:与血液相互作用试验选择[S].北京:中国标准出版社，2003.[14]GB/T16886.3-2008,医疗器械生物学评价第3部分:遗传毒性、致癌性和生殖毒性试验[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.[15]黄虹蓉,林钟石,刘尧,等.一种肠镜润滑消泡剂的细胞毒性和遗传毒性生物学评价[J].医学信息,2019,32(16):62-65,79.[16]Zhuravleva IY,Karpova EV,Oparina LA,et al.Cross-linking method using pentaepoxide for improving bovine and porcine bioprosthetic pericardia: A multiparametric assessment study[J].Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl,2021,118:111473[17]王建光,刘天起,王雪梅,等.京尼平与戊二醛鞣制牛心包材料的对比研究[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2011,49(5):24-28.[18]田聪,万荣欣,刘欣,等.生物交联剂京尼平交联牛心包生物支架材料的性能[J].中国生物医学工程学报,2011,30(2):281-286.[19]Liu J,Li B,Jing H,et al.Curcumin-crosslinked acellular bovine pericardium for the application of calcification inhibition heart valves[J].Biomed Mater,2020,15(4):045002.[20]王云兵,雷洋,訾振军.一种采用酶交联和茶多酚组合联用处理生物瓣膜的方法:CN110841110B[P].2020-02-28.[21]温晓晓,张坤,潘孔荣,等.一种非戊二醛化学体系处理的生物瓣膜材料的生物相容性研究[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2022,29(12):1653-1659.

相似文献/References:

[1]王照华,杨 越,徐景超,等.家兔股骨植入可降解型镁合金加压螺钉的生物效应与抗菌性能研究[J].医学信息,2021,34(19):88.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.19.022]
　WANG Zhao-hua,YANG Yue,XU Jing-chao,et al.Observation on Biological Effects and Antibacterial Properties of Degradable Magnesium Alloycompression Screws Implanted into Rabbit Femur[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(24):88.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.19.022]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01