[1]孙言非,白经纬,王 然.尿常规干化学法联合尿沉渣镜检对尿白细胞、红细胞及尿蛋白的检验价值分析[J].医学信息,2023,36(13):134-137.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.13.028]
　SUN Yan-fei,BAI Jing-wei,WANG Ran.Value of Urine Routine Dry Chemical Method Combined with Urine Sediment Microscopy in the Detection of Urine White Blood Cells, Red Blood Cells and Urine Protein[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(13):134-137.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.13.028]
点击复制

尿常规干化学法联合尿沉渣镜检对尿白细胞、红细胞及尿蛋白的检验价值分析()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2023年13期
页码:
134-137
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2023-07-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Value of Urine Routine Dry Chemical Method Combined with Urine Sediment Microscopy in the Detection of Urine White Blood Cells, Red Blood Cells and Urine Protein
文章编号:
1006-1959（2023）13-0134-04
作者:
孙言非; 白经纬; 王 然
（佳木斯市中心医院检验科，黑龙江 佳木斯 154002）
Author(s):
SUN Yan-fei; BAI Jing-wei; WANG Ran
(Laboratory Department of Jiamusi Central Hospital,Jiamusi 154002,Heilongjiang,China)
关键词:
尿常规; 干化学法; 尿沉渣镜检; 尿白细胞; 红细胞; 尿蛋白
Keywords:
Urine routine; Dry chemical method; Urine sediment microscopy; Urine leukocytes; Red blood cells; Urine protein
分类号:
R446.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.13.028
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探究尿常规干化学法联合尿沉渣镜检对尿白细胞（LEU）、红细胞（RBC）及尿蛋白（PRO）的检验价值。方法 以2019年7月-2022年7月佳木斯市中心医院行尿常规检测的90例受检者为研究对象，收集其尿液样本，给予尿干化学法检验、尿沉渣镜检及联合检验，比较尿干化学法检验与联合检验的LEU、RBC、PRO检验结果，并对其检验符合率、敏感度、特异度、准确度进行分析。结果 尿干化学法与联合检验的LEU、RBC、PRO检验结果比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；联合检验的检验结果符合率高于尿干化学法检验（P＜0.05）；联合检验对LEU、RBC、PRO的检验敏感度、特异度、准确度高于单一尿干化学法检验（P＜0.05）。结论 尿常规干化学法联合尿沉渣镜检可提高LEU、RBC、PRO的检验准确性，且检验敏感度与特异度均较为理想。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the value of urine routine dry chemical method combined with urine sediment microscopy in the detection of urine leukocytes (LEU), red blood cells (RBC) and urine protein (PRO).Methods A total of 90 subjects who underwent routine urine tests in Jiamusi Central Hospital from July 2019 to July 2022 were selected as the research objects. Their urine samples were collected and given urine dry chemical test, urine sediment microscopy and combined test. The LEU, RBC and PRO test results of urine dry chemical test and combined test were compared, and the coincidence rate, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the test were analyzed.Results There were statistically significant differences in LEU, RBC and PRO test results between urine dry chemical method and combined test (P＜0.05). The coincidence rate of the test results of the combined test was higher than that of the urine dry chemical test (P＜0.05). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of combined test for LEU, RBC and PRO were higher than those of single urine dry chemical test (P＜0.05).Conclusion Urine routine dry chemical method combined with urine sediment microscopy can improve the accuracy of LEU, RBC and PRO, and the sensitivity and specificity of the test are ideal.

参考文献/References:

[1]周小安,周小芹,薛辉,等.尿沉渣法、干化学法及传统镜检检测尿液有形成分的对比研究[J].检验医学与临床,2022,19(12):1668-1670,1674.[2]康星星,刘娟.尿干化学分析仪、尿沉渣分析仪和尿沉渣镜检联合应用在尿液红细胞检测中的意义[J].陕西医学杂志,2021,50(10):1289-1291.[3]Bacrea A,Fekete GL,Grigorescu BL,et al.Discrepancy in results between dipstick urinalysis and urine sediment microscopy[J].Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine,2021,21(5):538-538.[4]胡卫兵,章则陈.尿常规检验中尿沉渣、尿常规应用效果[J].中国继续医学教育,2020,12(8):79-81.[5]Herendael BV,Schaeren JV.Performance of urinalysis tests and their ability in predicting results of urine cultures: a comparison between automated test strip analyser and flow cytometry in various subpopulations and types of samples[J].Journal of Clinical Pathology,2017,70(7):631-637.[6]路琳君,孙梦甜,刘春晖,等.联合应用尿液干化学法与尿沉渣镜检法进行白细胞检验的临床价值探讨[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2019,29(7):860-861,864.[7]Afzalimoghaddam M,Fattahi M,Pourghorban R,et al.The accuracy of various types of urinalysis in terms of predicting intra-abdominal injury in emergency trauma patients: A diagnostic accuracy study[J].Archives of Trauma Research,2021,10(1):13.[8]Chase J,Hammond J,Bilbrough G,et al.Urine sediment examination: Potential impact of red and white blood cell counts using different sediment methods[J].Veterinary Clinical Pathology,2018,47(4):608-616.[9]李祥坤.不同尿沉渣检测方法在检测尿红细胞形态及参数中的价值分析[J].标记免疫分析与临床,2017,24(12):1419-1422.[10]黄业亚,孙鸿高.尿沉渣定量检测白细胞及细菌总数对尿路感染的诊断价值[J].海南医学,2017,28(14):2309-2311.[11]Enko D,Stelzer I,B?觟ckl M,et al.Comparison of the diagnostic performance of two automated urine sediment analyzers with manual phase-contrast microscopy[J].Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM),2019,58(2):151-154.[12]汪升学,彭佳琼.尿路感染临床诊断中尿常规检测的应用与价值研究[J].中国医药导刊,2017,19(1):81-82.[13]Chambliss AB,Mason HM,Van TT.Correlation of Chemical Urinalysis to Microscopic Urinalysis and Urine Culture: Implications for Reflex Urinalysis Workflows[J].The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine,2020,5(4):724-731.[14]聂丹,钟晓东.探讨尿干化学分析法、尿沉渣分析仪法和显微镜检查法三种方法相结合检测尿液分析的必要性[J].重庆医学,2017,46(2):261-263.[15]陶晓丽,朱惠,朱自力.尿干化学法、尿沉渣分析和显微镜镜检在泌尿系肿瘤患者尿液检测中对比应用研究[J].国际泌尿系统杂志,2019(3):479-482.[16]Cho J,Oh KJ,Jeon BC,et al.Comparison of five automated urine sediment analyzers with manual microscopy for accurate identification of urine sediment[J].Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine,2019,57(11):211.[17]赵嫚,袁绪龙,刘娜,等.基于不同方法对尿液红细胞检测的比对与疾病符合程度分析[J].标记免疫分析与临床,2019,26(9):1579-1582.[18]Lee AJ,Park CG,Bae YC,et al.Quality Improvement of Urinalysis Results Based on Automatic Sediment Urinalysis and Urine Strip Results[J].Journal of Laboratory Medicine and Quality Assurance,2017,39(4):154-161.[19]郝若飞.联合应用尿液干化学法与尿沉渣镜检法进行白细胞检验的临床价值分析[J].山西医药杂志,2019,48(21):2686-2687.[20]张俊,周芳芳,徐玮,等.干化学法检测尿蛋白的影响因素分析[J].检验医学,2018,33(10):916-919.[21]Yan LG,Cong HL,Al-Masud M,et al.Elevated Red Blood Cell Distribution Width Combined White Blood Cell in Peripheral Blood Routine Have a Better Sensitivity than CURB-65 Scores in Predicting ICU Admission and Mortality in Adult Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients[J].Clinical Laboratory,2019,65(3):823-828.[22]肖芬.尿液干化学法联合尿沉渣镜检法检测白细胞的价值分析[J].实用临床医药杂志,2018,22(21):158-159.

相似文献/References:

[1]崔金乔,邱 皓,李艳芬,等.甘肃省甘南地区儿童尿液筛查结果及影响因素分析[J].医学信息,2019,32(12):125.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.041]
　CUI Jin-qiao,QIU Hao,LI Yan-fen,et al.Analysis of Urine Screening Results and Influencing Factors of Children in Gannan Area of Gansu Province[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(13):125.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.041]
[2]宋培培.干化学法与尿沉渣分析仪法检测儿童尿液标本的结果比较[J].医学信息,2020,33(13):166.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.13.052]
　SONG Pei-pei.Comparison Between the Results of Dry Chemistry and Urine Sediment Analyzer in Detecting Urine Samples of Children[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(13):166.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.13.052]
[3]杨 晴,郭秋红.阴道分泌物对尿常规临床检验结果的影响及对策[J].医学信息,2020,33(18):168.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.18.056]
　YANG Qing,GUO Qiu-hong.The Effect of Vaginal Secretions on the Results of Routine Urine Clinical Examination and Its Countermeasures[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(13):168.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.18.056]
[4]李根秀,刘先林,欧阳建华.尿常规检查与尿沉渣检查对尿液白细胞、红细胞及尿蛋白指标的检验价值比较[J].医学信息,2022,35(11):127.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.11.033]
　LI Gen-xiu,LIU Xian-lin,OUYANG Jian-hua.Comparison of Urine Routine Examination and Urine Sediment Examination on Urine White Blood Cells, Red Blood Cells and Urine Protein Indexes[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(13):127.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.11.033]
[5]严良烽,陈国艳,夏 蕊.尿微量白蛋白/肌酐比值、尿常规与血清肌酐联合检测对糖尿病早期肾功能损伤的诊断价值[J].医学信息,2023,36(07):127.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.07.024]
　YAN Liang-feng,CHEN Guo-yan,XIA Rui.The Diagnostic Value of Combined Detection of Urinary Microalbumin/Creatinine Ratio,Urine Routine and Serum Creatinine in Early Diabetic Renal Injury[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(13):127.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.07.024]
[6]潘喜梅.白带常规与干化学法快速检测对阴道感染的诊断意义[J].医学信息,2024,37(19):145.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.19.030]
　PAN Ximei.Diagnostic Significance of Leucorrhea Routine and Rapid Detection of Dry Chemical Method for Vaginal Infection[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(13):145.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.19.030]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01