[1]杜 慧,刘 昕.常规超声联合超声造影对非特殊型浸润性乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的预测价值[J].医学信息,2024,37(01):120-124,149.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.01.020]
　DU Hui,LIU Xin.Predictive Value of Conventional Ultrasound Combined with Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis for Invasive Breast Carcinoma of No Specific Type[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(01):120-124,149.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.01.020]
点击复制

常规超声联合超声造影对非特殊型浸润性乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的预测价值()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
37卷
期数:
2024年01期
页码:
120-124,149
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2024-01-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Predictive Value of Conventional Ultrasound Combined with Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis for Invasive Breast Carcinoma of No Specific Type
文章编号:
1006-1959（2024）01-0120-06
作者:
杜 慧; 刘 昕
（1.承德医学院研究生学院，河北 承德 067000；2.保定市第一中心医院超声科，河北 保定 071000）
Author(s):
DU Hui; LIU Xin
(1.Graduate School of Chengde Medical College,Chengde 067000,Hebei,China;2.Department of Ultrasound,the First Central Hospital of Baoding City,Baoding 071000,Hebei,China)
关键词:
常规超声; 超声造影; 非特殊型浸润性乳腺癌; 腋窝淋巴结转移
Keywords:
Conventional ultrasound; Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Invasive breast carcinoma of no specific type; Axillary lymph node metastasis
分类号:
R737.9
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.01.020
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 分析非特殊型浸润性乳腺癌（IBC-NST）病灶双模态超声征象对腋窝淋巴结转移的预测价值。方法 回顾性收集2021年11月-2023年1月就诊于保定市第一中心医院的IBC-NST患者原发病灶的常规超声（US）、超声造影（CEUS）征象资料252例，根据腋窝淋巴结清扫术后病理结果分为转移组（n=148）和非转移组（n=104）。通过单因素及多因素分析建立单模态及双模态超声Logistic回归预测模型，并绘制受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线，评估3种预测模型对腋窝淋巴结转移的预测效能。结果 转移组与非转移组间的病灶大小、微钙化、Adler血流分级、位置、增强后边缘放射状汇聚、增强后病灶范围变化、穿支血管和灌注缺损的比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。多因素分析结果显示：US与CEUS联合诊断时，得出Logistic回归预测模型Logit（P）=-3.870+1.875Adler血流分级+1.112灌注缺损+1.667穿支血管+1.820增强后病灶范围变化，其预测腋窝淋巴结转移的ROC曲线下面积（AUC）（0.874）与US（0.689）、CEUS（0.827）比较，差异有统计学意义（Z=5.844，P＜0.05；Z=2.887，P=0.004）。双模态超声预测模型的灵敏度、特异度、准确度、PPV和NPV均高于US、CEUS单模态超声预测模型，预测效能最佳。结论 US、CEUS联合的双模态超声预测模型对IBC-NST早期腋窝淋巴结转移有较高的预测价值，可为临床预后的评估提供可靠的影像学依据。
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the predictive value of dual-modality ultrasound signs of invasive breast carcinoma of no specific type (IBC-NST) lesions on axillary lymph node metastasis.Methods The data of conventional ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) signs of primary lesions in 252 patients with IBC-NST who were admitted to the First Central Hospital of Baoding from November 2021 to January 2023 were retrospectively collected. According to the pathological results after axillary lymph node dissection, they were divided into metastasis group (n=148) and non-metastasis group (n=104). The single-modality and dual-modality ultrasound Logistic regression prediction models were established by univariate and multivariate analysis, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to evaluate the predictive efficacy of the three prediction models for axillary lymph node metastasis.Results There were significant differences in lesion size, microcalcification, Adler blood flow grading, location, radial convergence of the edge after enhancement, change of lesion range after enhancement, perforator vessels and perfusion defects between the metastatic group and the non-metastatic group (P<0.05). The results of multivariate analysis showed that when US and CEUS were jointly diagnosed, the Logistic regression prediction model Logit (P)=-3.870+1.875 Adler blood flow grade+1.112 perfusion defect+1.667 perforator vessel+1.820 changes in lesion range after enhancement, which predicted the area under the curve (AUC) (0.874) of axillary lymph node metastasis compared with US (0.689) and CEUS (0.827), the difference was statistically significant (Z=5.844, P<0.05; Z=2.887, P=0.004). Moreover, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV of the dual-modality ultrasound prediction model were higher than those of the US and CEUS single-modality ultrasound prediction models, and the prediction efficiency was the best.Conclusion The dual-modality ultrasound prediction model combined with US and CEUS has high predictive value for early axillary lymph node metastasis in IBC-NST, and can provide reliable imaging basis for clinical prognosis evaluation.

参考文献/References:

[1]叶入裴,廖烨晖,夏天,等.乳腺化生性癌与非特殊类型浸润性癌临床病理特征比较[J].中国老年学杂志,2019,39(20):4949-4952.[2]Marino MA,Avendano D,Zapata P,et al.Lymph Node Imaging in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer: Concurrent Diagnostic Tools[J].Oncologist,2020,25(2):e231-e242.[3]Magnoni F,Galimberti V,Corso G,et al.Axillary surgery in breast cancer: An updated historical perspective[J].Seminars in Oncology,2020,47(6):341-352.[4]Belmonte R,Messaggi-Sartor M,Ferrer M,et al.Prospective study of shoulder strength, shoulder range of motion, and lymphedema in breast cancer patients from pre-surgery to 5 years after ALND or SLNB[J].Support Care Cancer,2018,26(9):3277-3287. [5]Guo Q,Dong ZW,Zhang L,et al.Ultrasound Features of Breast Cancer for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis[J].Journal of Ultrasound Medicine,2018,37:1354-1353.[6]Yu XQ,Hao XY,Wan J,et al.Correlation between Ultrasound Appearance of Small Breast Cancer and Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis[J].Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology,2018,44(2):342-349.[7]丛斌斌,曹晓珊,王春建,等.临床查体阴性但超声检查及穿刺确诊腋窝淋巴结转移的乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的可行性分析[J].中国癌症杂志,2023,33(6):574-580. [8]Duan Y,Zhu YY,Nie F,et al.Predictive value of combining clinicopathological, multimodal ultrasonic characteristics in axillary lymph nodal metastasis burden of patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancer[J].Clinical Hemorheology & Microcirculation,2022,81(3):255-269.[9]Adler DD,Carson PL,Rubin JM,et al.Doppler ultrasound color flow imaging in the study of breast cancer: preliminary findings[J].Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology,1990,16(6):553-559.[10]中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会.中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2021年版)[J].中国癌症杂志,2021,31(10):954-1040.[11]陈娟,谢明星,王静,等.实时剪切波弹性成像评价干燥综合征患者涎腺弹性模量的初步临床研究[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2018,27(3):220-225.[12]罗海愉,钟洁愉,张屿森,等.临床病理及超声多参数评估乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的价值[J].中国超声医学杂志,2018,34(7):590-593.[13]Zhao Y,Wang X,Huang Y,et al.Response to immunohistochemical markers’ conversion after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: association between imaging and histopathologic analysis[J].Clinical & Translational Oncology,2020,22:91-102.[14]余小琴,高军喜,姚兰辉,等.乳腺癌超声征象与淋巴结转移关系的单因素及多因素分析[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2010(4):317-320.[15]李文肖,刘燕,曹春莉,等.常规超声联合超声造影预测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的价值[J].实用医学杂志,2022,38(18):2272-2278.[16]桑田,张海俊,曹玉文,等.Logistic回归分析乳腺癌常规超声征象与腋窝淋巴结转移的关系[J].中国医学影像技术,2021,37(8):1158-1162.[17]崇乐,夏露花,赵亮,等.乳腺癌超声造影指标与临床病理及肿瘤相关成纤维细胞数量的相关性[J].分子影像学杂志,2021,44(2):264-269.[18]刘振华,廖海燕,刘京,等.乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移超声造影特征分析[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2019,26(3):175-178.[19]梁舒媛,罗渝昆,费翔,等.高帧频超声造影在鉴别浅表淋巴结性质中的应用[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2020,17(9):841-847.[20]杜菲,侯素平,牟荣骥,等.经皮超声造影联合BI-RADS分级对乳腺癌前哨淋巴结转移的诊断价值分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2016,31(2):427-429.[21]赵璐,张莹,程颢,等.乳腺超声造影预测模型的建立及其对乳腺良恶性病变诊断效能的分析[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2019,16(6):419-425.[22]Wang L,Li JT,Qiao JH,et al.Establishment of a model for predicting sentinel lymph node metastasis in early breast cancer based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound and clinicopathological features[J].Gland Surgery,2021,10(5):1701-1712.[23]高军喜,王雅婷,杨磊,等.乳腺癌超声造影特征及边缘带定量参数与生物学预后因子相关性研究[J].中国超声医学杂志,2019,35(4):306-309.[24]Fei F,Qu J,Zhang MQ,et al.S100A4 in cancer progression and metastasis:A systematic review[J].Oncotarget,2017,8(42):73219-73239.[25]Xu H,Hu MY,Liu MR et al.Nano-puerarin regulates tumor microenvironment and facilitates chemo- and immunotherapy in murine triple negative breast cancer model[J].Biomaterials,2020,235:119769.

相似文献/References:

[1]李前进,马惠斌,拜合提亚·阿扎提,等.超声造影与增强CT对小肾癌诊断价值及不同病理类型超声造影表现的研究[J].医学信息,2019,32(10):163.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.054]
　LI Qian-jin,MA Hui-bin,Baihe Azati,et al.The Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography and Contrast-enhanced CT inthe Diagnosis of Small Renal Cell Carcinoma and the Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(01):163.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.054]
[2]杜鑫荣.超声造影在肝实质性肿块诊断及鉴别中的临床价值[J].医学信息,2019,32(19):176.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.19.059]
　DU Xin-rong.Clinical Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Liver Mass[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(01):176.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.19.059]
[3]董 建,褚志强,童 瑾.超声造影在经皮肝穿射频消融治疗小肝癌中的应用价值[J].医学信息,2020,33(15):174.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.15.056]
　DONG Jian,CHU Zhi-qiang,TONG Jin.Application Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in PercutaneousRadiofrequency Ablation for Small Liver Cancer[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(01):174.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.15.056]
[4]盛海龙,方长太,查佳安.超声造影对重症急性胰腺炎并发早期急性肾损的诊断价值[J].医学信息,2022,35(09):171.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.09.044]
　SHENG Hai-long,FANG Chang-tai,ZHA Jia-an.Diagnostic Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography in Severe Acute Pancreatitis Complicated with Early Acute Kidney Injury[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(01):171.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.09.044]
[5]董振宇.超声造影联合增强CT对肝局灶性结节与小肝细胞癌早期的临床鉴别诊断价值[J].医学信息,2024,37(11):139.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.11.028]
　DONG Zhen-yu.Clinical Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Combined with Contrast-enhanced CT in the Early Differential Diagnosis of Focal Nodular Hyperplasia and Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(01):139.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.11.028]
[6]黄志涛,周彩红,郭伟勤.超声造影联合增强CT对肝局灶性结节与小肝细胞癌早期的临床鉴别诊断价值[J].医学信息,2024,37(22):161.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.22.040]
　HUANG Zhitao,ZHOU Caihong,GUO Weiqin.Clinical Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Combined with Enhanced CT in the Early Differential Diagnosis of Focal Liver Nodules and Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(01):161.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.22.040]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01