[1]蔡庆明,郑伟伟.乳腺微创旋切术与传统开放术对乳腺良性肿块术后疼痛、瘢痕及并发症的影响[J].医学信息,2024,37(22):58.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.22.014]
　CAI Qingming,ZHENG Weiwei.Effect of Minimally Invasive Breast Rotary Cutting and Traditional Open Surgery on Postoperative Pain, Scar and Complications of Benign Breast Masses[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(22):58.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.22.014]
点击复制

乳腺微创旋切术与传统开放术对乳腺良性肿块术后疼痛、瘢痕及并发症的影响()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
37卷
期数:
2024年22期
页码:
58
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2024-11-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Minimally Invasive Breast Rotary Cutting and Traditional Open Surgery on Postoperative Pain, Scar and Complications of Benign Breast Masses
文章编号:
1006-1959（2024）22-0058-05
作者:
蔡庆明1; 郑伟伟2
宜丰县人民医院外三科1，外一科2，江西 宜丰 336300
Author(s):
CAI Qingming1; ZHENG Weiwei2
The Third Department of Surgery1,the First Department of Surgery2,Yifeng County People’s Hospital,Yifeng 336300,Jiangxi,China
关键词:
乳腺微创旋切术; 传统开放术; 乳腺良性肿块
Keywords:
Minimally invasive breast rotary cutting; Traditional open surgery; Benign breast masses
分类号:
R655.8
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.22.014
摘要:
目的 比较乳腺微创旋切术与传统开放术对乳腺良性肿块患者术后疼痛、瘢痕及并发症的影响。方法 选取2020年1月-2023年7月宜丰县人民医院收治的乳腺良性肿块患者60例作为研究对象，按照随机数字表法将所有患者分为对照组和研究组，每组30例。对照组应用传统开放术治疗，研究组应用乳腺微创旋切术治疗。比较两组乳房美观性、手术情况（手术时长、自主活动时间、术后24 h疼痛评分、术后48 h疼痛评分、乳房瘢痕）、术后并发症发生率、炎症因子水平[白细胞介素-10（IL-10）、干扰素-γ（INF-γ）、血清C反应蛋白（CRP）]。结果 研究组乳房美观性优良率为93.33%，高于对照组的76.67%（P＜0.05）；研究组手术时长、自主活动时间短于对照组，术后24 h疼痛评分、术后48 h疼痛评分、乳房瘢痕评分均低于对照组（P＜0.05）；研究组术后并发症发生率低于对照组（P＜0.05）；两组术后血清IL-10、CRP水平较术前升高，且研究组低于对照组（P＜0.05）；两组术后血清INF-γ水平较术前降低，且研究组水平高于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论 乳腺微创旋切术能够减轻乳腺良性肿块患者术后疼痛，改善患者乳房美观性，降低术后并发症发生率和炎性反应，患者术后康复速度更快，值得临床应用。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the effects of minimally invasive breast rotary cutting and traditional open surgery on postoperative pain, scar and complications in patients with benign breast masses.Methods A total of 60 patients with benign breast masses admitted to Yifeng County People’s Hospital from January 2020 to July 2023 were selected as the research objects. According to the random number table method, all patients were analyzed in the control group and the study group, with 30 patients in each group. The control group was treated with traditional open surgery, and the study group was treated with minimally invasive breast rotary cutting. The breast aesthetics, surgical conditions (operation time, spontaneous activity time, postoperative 24 h pain score, postoperative 48 h pain score, breast scar), incidence of postoperative complications, levels of inflammatory factors [interleukin-10 (IL-10), interferon-γ (INF-γ), serum C-reactive protein (CRP)] were compared between the two groups.Results The excellent and good rate of breast aesthetics in the study group was 93.33%, which was higher than 76.67% in the control group (P<0.05). The operation time and spontaneous activity time of the study group were shorter than those of the control group, and the pain score at 24 h after operation, the pain score at 48 h after operation and the breast scar score were lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the study group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The levels of serum IL-10 and CRP in the two groups after operation were higher than those before operation, and those in the study group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The serum INF-γ level of the two groups after operation was lower than that before operation, and that of the study group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion Minimally invasive breast rotary cutting can reduce postoperative pain in patients with benign breast masses, improve breast aesthetics, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and inflammatory response, and accelerate postoperative recovery, which is worthy of clinical application.

参考文献/References:

[1]周颖,刘韬.超声引导MMT微创旋切术治疗对女性良性乳腺肿块围术期指标术后疼痛瘢痕及并发症的影响[J].河北医学,2023,29(4):663-667.[2]王沛,刘尚军,张如辉.乳腺良性肿块患者EnCor微创旋切术后血肿发生状况及影响因素[J].中国医药导报,2022,19(23):97-99,108.[3]马靖靖,宋文华,刘小五,等.超声引导下微创旋切手术与传统开放手术治疗乳腺良性肿块的疗效对比[J].川北医学院学报,2021,36(3):360-362,369.[4]方红,赵子伟,韩雪,等.麦默通微创旋切术切除直径1cm良性乳腺肿块的临床疗效及其对病人免疫功能的影响[J].临床外科杂志,2019,27(3):205-208.[5]戴军,杨旭辉,吴晓,等.微创旋切术用于老年乳腺良性肿块患者对手术指标、应激反应和免疫功能的影响[J].现代生物医学进展,2020,20(21):4051-4054.[6]钱宇峰,童东明,昌莉莉.乳腺微创旋切术与传统开放术治疗乳腺良性肿块术中情况、术后疼痛、瘢痕及并发症的对比分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2018,33(5):1170-1172.[7]余丽萍,赖江琼,何志安,等.超声引导下Mammotome微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿块[J].现代生物医学进展,2018,18(9):1698-1700,1734.[8]殷照才,梅振宇,盛勇,等.微创旋切与传统手术治疗乳腺多发良性肿块的疗效比较[J].国际外科学杂志,2019,46(5):329-333.[9]刘巧刿,刘晓岭,韩燕妮,等.乳腺良性肿物麦默通微创旋切术与常规切除术的比较[J].南昌大学学报(医学版),2019,59(6):51-54.[10]耿金秀,刘新梅,王绪麟,等.高频彩超下乳腺肿块微创旋切术对术后瘢痕长度及并发症发生率的影响[J].中国地方病防治杂志,2018,33(1):106,108.[11]黄大翠,杨向贵,夏林玉.安珂微创旋切系统在乳腺良性肿块切除中的应用及预后影响分析[J].中国美容医学,2020,29(12):72-75.[12]邵文娟.乳癖散结颗粒对乳腺增生微创旋切术后患者焦虑、抑郁情绪及血清E2、PRL水平的影响[J].中国中医药科技,2020,27(2):284-285.[13]陈晓英,李季,回世德.超导下麦默通术与区段切除术对乳腺良性肿块患者血清丙二醛、SOD、GSH-Px表达的影响[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2022,21(3):299-303.[14]魏娅.超声引导下麦默通微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性病变及不可触及病变的价值[J].医药论坛杂志,2018,39(7):35-36,39.[15]谢奕丹,吴晓玲,关敏婷,等.乳腺良性肿块麦默通围手术期应用尖吻蝮蛇血凝酶的药物经济学分析[J].医药导报,2019,38(4):499-502.[16]肖献秋,芮小平,王力,等.超声引导联合Encor真空辅助微创旋切系统治疗乳腺良性肿块的临床疗效[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2019,41(12):1265-1268.[17]彭光生,陈怡.超声引导下乳腺旋切术与开放性手术在乳腺良性肿块治疗中的价值比较[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2021,46(1):80-82.[18]姚乐申,金志斌.超声引导下麦默通微创旋切系统在老年乳腺良性肿块治疗中的价值[J].实用老年医学,2019,33(12):1206-1209.[19]谢雨芹,邓爽,邓倩,等.超声引导下微创乳腺麦默通旋切系统治疗多发性乳腺肿块临床分析[J].中国临床医生杂志,2021,49(1):79-81.[20]武晓娜.超声引导下麦默通微创旋切系统治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的应用价值[J].山西医药杂志,2021,50(5):818-820.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01