[1]翟 蓓,周 洋,周 薇,等.超声检查、磁共振及血清CA125测定诊断 子宫腺肌病的临床评价[J].医学信息,2018,31(11):154-155,158.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.11.050]
　ZHAI Bei,ZHOU Yang,ZHOU Wei,et al.Clinical Evaluation of Ultrasonography,Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Serum CA125 in Diagnosis of Adenomyosis[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(11):154-155,158.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.11.050]
点击复制

超声检查、磁共振及血清CA125测定诊断 子宫腺肌病的临床评价()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
31卷
期数:
2018年11期
页码:
154-155,158
栏目:
诊疗技术
出版日期:
2018-06-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Evaluation of Ultrasonography,Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Serum CA125 in Diagnosis of Adenomyosis
文章编号:
1006-1959（2018）11-0154-03
作者:
翟 蓓; 周 洋; 周 薇; 杨兴洲
成都市第三人民医院重庆医科大学附属成都第二临床学院超声科，四川 成都 610031
Author(s):
ZHAI Bei; ZHOU Yang; ZHOU Wei; YANG Xing-zhou
Department of Ultrasound,Chengdu Second Clinical College Affiliated to Chongqing Medical University,Chengdu Third People’s Hospital,Chengdu 610031,Sichuan,China
关键词:
磁共振; 超声; 血清CA125; 子宫腺肌病
Keywords:
Key words：Magnetic resonance; Ultrasound; Serum CA125; Adenomyosis
分类号:
R711.71
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.11.050
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 评价超声检查、磁共振及血清CA125测定诊断子宫腺肌病的临床价值。方法 回顾分析2016年12月~2017年12月在我院诊治的50例子宫腺肌病和子宫肌瘤患者临床资料，患者分别进行超声检查、磁共振、血清CA125测定，评价临床准确率、敏感性、特异性。结果 磁共振诊断准确率、敏感性、特异性分别为96.00%、93.10%、100.00%，高于超声检查（80.00%、75.86%、85.71%）和血清CA125测定（82.00%、72.41%、95.23%），差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。子宫腺肌病组血清CA125水平（104.60±68.20）kU/L，高于子宫肌瘤组（22.40±16.89）kU/L，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。子宫腺肌病和子宫肌瘤患者临床表现（痛经、子宫增大、月经过多）较为相近，两组对比差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 超声检查、磁共振检查、血清CA125测定诊断子宫腺肌病均具有一定价值，临床可首选血清CA125测定、超声检查，对于诊断困难者进行磁共振检查，以进一步提高临床术前诊断准确率。
Abstract:
Abstract：Objective To evaluate the clinical value of ultrasonography,magnetic resonance imaging and serum CA125 in the diagnosis of adenomyosis.Methods The clinical data of 50 cases of adenomyosis and uterine fibroids diagnosed and treated in our hospital from December 2016 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed.The patients were examined with ultrasound,magnetic resonance, serum CA125,evaluate clinical accuracy,sensitivity,and specificity.Results The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging were 96.00%,93.10%,and 100.00%,respectively,which were higher than those of ultrasonography (80.00%,75.86%,85.71%)and serum CA125(82.00%,72.41%,95.23%),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The serum CA125 level in the adenomyosis group was(104.60±68.20) kU/L,which was higher than that in the uterine fibroids group(22.40±16.89) kU/L,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The clinical manifestations of patients with adenomyosis and uterine fibroids (dysmenorrhea,uterus enlargement,and menorrhagia)were similar,there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion Ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging and serum CA125 have a certain value in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Serum CA125 determination and ultrasonography are the first choices in clinic.Magnetic resonance imaging is used to diagnose patients with difficulty in diagnosis to further improve the preoperative diagnostic accuracy.

参考文献/References:

[1]李琳.血清CA125、EMAb联合检测对子宫腺肌病诊断价值的ROC曲线评价[J].中国妇幼保健,2016,31(23):4988-4990. [2]张文英,王玉叶,李东旭.血清CA125与EMAb联合经阴彩超对子宫腺肌病诊断的价值[J].医学信息,2015,28(5):89-90. [3]崔晓燕,魏增涛,王晓燕,等.阴道超声检查联合血清CA125检测对子宫腺肌病的诊断价值[J].山东医药,2013,53(28):73-74. [4]方蕾,丁维琴.阴道超声联合癌抗原125和子宫内膜抗体检测在子宫腺肌病诊断中的价值[J].生殖医学杂志,2014,23(8):664-667. [5]蔡喜梅.CA125和EMAb联合检测在腺肌病与子宫肌瘤中的临床意义分析[J].中国实验诊断学,2014,18(4):662-663. [6]宋亚丽.行气祛瘀汤在子宫腺肌病患者治疗中的临床效果[J].海峡药学,2017,29(6):149-150. [7]何晖.腹腔镜下子宫动脉阻断联合病灶切除术对子宫腺肌病的治疗价值分析[J].中国卫生标准管理,2016,7(18):37-38.

相似文献/References:

[1]姚玉琳,王小红,覃开凤.大动脉转位的产前超声诊断评价[J].医学信息,2018,31(05):153.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.055]
　YAO Yu-lin,WANG Xiao-hong,QIN Kai-feng.Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnosis of Transposition of Great Arteries[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(11):153.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.055]
[2]王文平,吕小勇.常规超声对乳腺X线单纯微钙化病灶的诊断价值[J].医学信息,2018,31(12):6.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.002]
　WANG Wen-ping,LV Xiao-yong.Diagnostic Value of Conventional Ultrasound for Breast X Ray Simple Microcalcification Lesions[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(11):6.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.002]
[3]夏 斌,陈 剑.甲状腺影像报告和数据系统的发展及临床应用[J].医学信息,2018,31(12):43.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.014]
　XIA Bin,CHEN Jian.Development and Clinical Application of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(11):43.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.014]
[4]陈小云.MRI扩散峰度成像对乳腺病变的价值分析[J].医学信息,2022,35(11):110.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.11.028]
　CHEN Xiao-yun.The Value of MRI Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Breast Lesions[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(11):110.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.11.028]
[5]刘雪静,路 红,徐熠琳,等.乳腺影像与容积导航技术初步应用的临床分析[J].医学信息,2022,35(11):161.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.11.043]
　LIU Xue-jing,LU Hong,XU Yi-lin,et al.Clinical Analysis of the Preliminary Application of Breast Imaging and Volume Navigation Technology[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(11):161.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.11.043]
[6]林秋花,郭海珊,唐 莉,等.影像学检查在诊断胎盘植入中的预测价值[J].医学信息,2019,32(03):58.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.03.019]
　LIN Qiu-hua,GUO Hai-shan,TANG Li,et al.Predictive Value of Imaging Examination in the Diagnosis of Placenta Implantation[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(11):58.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.03.019]
[7]张 玉,唐 静,董虹美.超声检测早孕期卵黄囊的临床意义[J].医学信息,2018,31(18):22.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.18.009]
　ZHANG Yu,TANG Jing,Dong Hong-mei.Clinical Significance of Detecting Yolk Sac in Early Pregnancy by Ultrasonography[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(11):22.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.18.009]
[8]尹淑红,王淑云.乳腺纤维腺病的超声分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(18):157.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.18.051]
　YIN Shu-hong,WANG Shu-yun.Ultrasound Analysis of Fibroadenosis of Breast[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(11):157.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.18.051]
[9]楼浩男,张 矛,刘 洪.超声引导下泡沫硬化治疗小隐静脉曲张的临床疗效分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(18):182.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.18.060]
　LOU Hao-nan,ZHANG Mao,LIU Hong.Clinical Analysis of Ultrasound-guided Foam Sclerotherapy for Small Saphenous Vein[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(11):182.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.18.060]
[10]龚英姿,吴建华.乳腺超声检查中BI-RADS分级诊断标准对乳腺原位癌的诊断价值[J].医学信息,2018,31(19):161.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.19.050]
　GONG Ying-zi,WU Jian-hua.Diagnostic Value of BI-RADS Grading Diagnostic Criteria for Breast Carcinoma in Situ in Breast Ultrasound[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(11):161.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.19.050]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-06-01