[1]张自园,陈家应,李爱民,等.时效控制对有手术指征高血压脑出血患者疗效的影响研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(19):1-4.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.19.001]
　ZHANG Zi-yuan,CHEN Jia-ying,LI Ai-min,et al.Effect of Time Effect Control on the Efficacy of Patients with Surgical Indications of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage[J].Medical Information,2018,31(19):1-4.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.19.001]
点击复制

时效控制对有手术指征高血压脑出血患者疗效的影响研究()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
31卷
期数:
2018年19期
页码:
1-4
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-10-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Time Effect Control on the Efficacy of Patients with Surgical Indications of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage
文章编号:
1006-1959（2018）19-0001-04
作者:
张自园; 陈家应; 李爱民; 孙 勇
南京医科大学公共卫生学院，江苏 南京 211166
Author(s):
ZHANG Zi-yuan; CHEN Jia-ying; LI Ai-min; SUN Yong
School of Public Health,Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 211166,Jiangsu,China
关键词:
时效控制; 手术指征; 高血压性脑出血
Keywords:
Time effect control; Surgical indications; Hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage
分类号:
R743.34
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.19.001
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
目的 探讨急性脑卒中时效控制对有手术指征的高血压脑出血患者临床预后的影响。方法 回顾性分析2015年1月~2017年12月连云港市第一人民医院神经外科收治的536例入院有手术指征HICH患者的临床资料，依据建立急性脑卒中时效控制前后分组，时效控制前符合入组标准共255例，设为对照组；时效控制后，符合入组标准共281例，设为观察组。对比分析两组患者的一般资料、入院后术前时间窗和临床预后。结果 两组患者性别、年龄、血压、入院时GCS评分、出血量、有无脑疝、手术方式、麻醉方式等比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。观察组患者入院后术前时间窗低于对照组[（172.17±45.14）min vs （185.26±49.34）min]，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组患者KPS评分高于对照组[（52.59±26.37）分 vs （38.43±21.29）分]，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 时效控制能显著缩短入急诊室至手术开始时间，并能有效改善HICH患者手术治疗预后。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the effect of time control of acute stroke on the clinical prognosis of patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage with surgical indications. Methods A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 536 patients with HICH admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery,Lianyungang First People’s Hospital from January 2015 to December 2017,according to the establishment of acute cerebral apoplexy before and after the control group, 255 cases were in accordance with the admission criteria before the time limit control,and were set up as the control group.There were 281 cases in accordance with the standard of admission after time control,and they were divided into observation group.The general data,preoperative time window and clinical prognosis were compared between the two groups.Results There were no significant differences in gender,age,blood pressure,GCS score at admission,bleeding volume, presence or absence of cerebral palsy,surgical procedure,and anesthesia,the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).The preoperative time window of the observation group was lower than that of the control group[(172.17±45.14) min vs (185.26±49.34) min],the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);the KPS score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group[(52.59±26.37)points vs.(38.43±21.29)points,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The time effect control can significantly shorten the time from the emergency room to the start of surgery,and can effectively improve the prognosis of patients with HICH.

参考文献/References:

[1]Hu X,Zhang JH,Qin X.Risk factors of early death in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage during hospitalization[J].ActaNeurochir Suppl,2011,111(1):387-391. [2]邓杰超,罗高权,唐绍辉,等.卒中中心在脑卒中患者抢救中的应用效果[J].广东医学,2017,38(21):3321-3322. [3]严金海.信息时代企业时效管理的重要意义[J].现代企业,2011(10):6-7. [4]吴海滨,陈军,李爱民,等.高血压脑出血手术时机规范化研究[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2010,13(7):28-29. [5]刘宏浩,王少雄,黄程,等.不同手术时机治疗高血压脑出血的对比分析研究[J].重庆医学,2014,43(22):2925-2927. [6]钱章林,郑勇,吴永刚,等.影响高血压脑出血微创治疗短期预后的相关因素分析[J].中华临床医师杂志,2016,10(7):919-925. [7]唐志清,梁新强.高血压脑出血外科治疗进展[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2016,37(2):239-240. [8]李克和,黄录茂,雍成明,等.手术方式与时机的选择对不同部位高血压脑出血患者预后的影响[J].中华解剖与临床杂志,2015,20(3):230-235. [9]杨利超,赵中甫,杨琼琼.不同手术时机治疗高血压脑出血效果对比评价[J].中外医疗,2016,35(20):36-38. [10]赵礼彬,曾琴.不同手术时机治疗与高血压脑出血患者术后再出血及近期疗效的关系研究[J].河北医学,2015,21(12):1959-1962. [11]孔祥溢,马文斌,李永宁,等.浅论神经外科医患沟通的特点、困境和技巧[J].现代生物医学进展,2017,17(16):3176-3179.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-10-29