[1]周 军.胃穿孔行修补术和胃大部切除术的研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(05):103-104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.034]
　ZHOU Jun.Repair of Gastric Perforation and Subtotal Gastrectomy[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(05):103-104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.034]
点击复制

胃穿孔行修补术和胃大部切除术的研究()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
31卷
期数:
2018年05期
页码:
103-104
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2018-03-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Repair of Gastric Perforation and Subtotal Gastrectomy
文章编号:
1006-1959（2018）05-0103-02
作者:
周 军
四川省九寨沟县中藏医院普外科，四川 九寨沟 623400
Author(s):
ZHOU Jun
Department of General Surgery,Zhongzang Hospital,Jiuzhaigou 623400,Sichuan,China
关键词:
胃穿孔; 修补术; 胃大部切除术
Keywords:
Key wordsGastric perforation; Repair; Subtotal gastrectomy
分类号:
R656.61
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.034
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究胃穿孔行修补术和胃大部切除术的临床疗效。方法 回顾分析2016年10月~2017年10月在我院治疗的90例胃穿孔患者临床资料，依据手术方法将其分为修补组和切除组，各45例。切除组采用胃大部切除术，修补组采用修补术，对比两组患者临床疗效。结果 修补组治疗总有效率与切除组对比，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；修补组手术时间、住院时间短于切除组，术中出血量少于切除组，并发症发生率低于切除组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；切除组复发率低于修补组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 胃修补术和胃大部切除术治疗胃穿孔均具有一定的疗效，修补术创伤小，手术时间短，出血量少，而切除术复发率低。两种手术方法各有优势，临床应依据患者具体情况合理选择。
Abstract:
Abstract：Objective To study the clinical effect of repair and subtotal gastrectomy for gastric perforation.Methods The clinical data of 90 patients with gastric perforation treated in our hospital from October 2016 to October 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the operative method,the patients were divided into two groups:the repair group and the resected group,45 cases each group.The resection group was treated with subtotal gastrectomy,and the repair group with the repair operation.Comparison of clinical efficacy between the two groups was made.Results There was no significant difference in the total effective rate between the repair group and the resection group(P>0.05),the operative time,the hospitalization time and the amount of intraoperative bleeding in the repair group were shorter than those in the resection group,and the incidence of complications was lower than that in the resection group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The recurrence rate in resection group was lower than that in repair group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Gastric repair and subtotal gastrectomy are effective in the treatment of gastric perforation.They have advantages of less trauma,shorter operation time,less bleeding,and lower recurrence rate of resection. Clinical selection should be based on the patient's specific situation.

参考文献/References:

[1]郝玉峰.单纯胃修补术治疗胃穿孔患者48例临床效果观察[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2015,15(73):113-114. [2]刘俊杰,何嘉琳,梁伟雄,等.单纯修补术与胃大部分切除术治疗急性胃穿孔疗效比较[J].中国医药科学,2016,6(6):128-130. [3]游波,王盈,邱卓,等.不同术式治疗急性胃穿孔的临床效果观察[J].中国医学工程,2013,21(3):177. [4]柴宏伟.不同术式治疗急性胃穿孔的临床观察[J].基层医学论坛,2015,19(9):1202-1204. [5]周洪彪.手术治疗急性胃穿孔的临床观察[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015(22):55-56. [6]杜欣,李革.不同术式治疗156例急性胃穿孔的疗效观察[J].延边大学医学学报,2016(4):281-283.

相似文献/References:

[1]李 静,张微微,蒋 威.CT三维重建技术在颅骨缺损修补术中的应用[J].医学信息,2018,31(12):166.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.053]
　LI Jing,ZHANG Wei-wei,JIANG Wei.Application of Three-dimensional CT Reconstruction in the Repair of Skull Defect[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(05):166.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.053]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-03-01