[1]钟书平.LEEP刀与冷刀锥切治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的效果分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(09):106-108.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.09.031]
　ZHONG Shu-ping.Analysis of the Effect of LEEP Knife and Cold Knife Conization in the Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(09):106-108.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.09.031]
点击复制

LEEP刀与冷刀锥切治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的效果分析()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
31卷
期数:
2018年09期
页码:
106-108
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2018-05-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of the Effect of LEEP Knife and Cold Knife Conization in the Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
文章编号:
1006-1959（2018）09-0106-03
作者:
钟书平
1.乐山市市中区妇幼保健院妇科，四川 乐山 614000； 2.乐山市人民医院妇科，四川 乐山 614000
Author(s):
ZHONG Shu-ping
1.Department of Gynecology,Lezhong City Central District,Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Leshan 614000,Sichuan,China; 2.Department of Gynecology,Leshan City People's Hospital,Leshan 614000Sichuan,China
关键词:
宫颈上皮内瘤变; LEEP刀; 冷刀锥切
Keywords:
Key words：Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; LEEP knife; Cold knife conization
分类号:
R737.33
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.09.031
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨子宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅲ级的患者采用环形高频电波刀与冷刀锥切治疗的临床效果。方法 选取我院CINⅢ级伴高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染患者98例，按患者门诊号单双数分为两组，单号为观察组，双号为对照组，每组49例。观察组采用LEEP刀治疗，对照组采用CKC治疗。观察两组患者手术情况，采用日常生活评分评估两组患者术后生活质量情况。随访1年，观察患者预后情况和HPV阴转情况。结果 观察组患者手术时间、出血量、创面愈合时间上均优于对照组（P＜0.05）。两组患者治疗前生活质量评分，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；治疗后观察组 ADL 评分高于对照组（P＜0.05）。随访患者1年，观察组与对照组好转率，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；而观察组并发症发生率为4.08%，低于对照组16.33%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。观察组LEEP治疗后6个月HPV阳性率16.33%，低于观察组22.45%，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 LEEP 治疗CINⅢ效果与CKC相似，但手术操作更简便，创伤更小，术后不良反应更小，恢复更佳，值得临床应用及推广。
Abstract:
Abstract：Objective To investigate the clinical effect of loop electrosurgical knife and cold knife conization for patients with grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.Methods 98 patients with high risk human papillomavirus infection(CIN Ⅲ)in our hospital were divided into two groups according to the number and even number of outpatient service.The single number was the observation group and the double number was the control group(49 cases in each group).The observation group was treated with LEEP knife and the control group with CKC.The operation status of the two groups was observed,and the life quality of the two groups was evaluated by the daily life score.Follow up for 1 years,the prognosis and HPV negative conversion were observed.Results The operative time, bleeding volume and wound healing time of the observation group were better than that of the control group (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the quality of life between the two groups before treatment(P>0.05).After treatment,the ADL score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).After 1 years of follow-up,there was no significant difference in the improvement rate between the observation group and the control group(P>0.05),while the incidence of complications in the observation group was 4.08%,lower than that of the control group 16.33%,with a statistically significant difference(P<0.05).In the observation group,the positive rate of HPV was 16.33% in the 6 months after LEEP treatment,which was lower than that in the observation group 22.45%,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The effect of LEEP for the treatment of CIN III is similar to that of CKC,but the operation is more convenient,less traumatic,less adverse reaction after operation,better recovery,and worthy of clinical application and popularization.

参考文献/References:

[1]农文清.宫颈上皮内瘤变诊疗进展[J].新医学,2010,41(6):415-418.
[2]谷丽静. LEEP刀宫颈锥切术联合术前术后应用重组α-2b干扰素栓治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变临床疗效分析[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2015,23(9):600-602,606.
[3]唐文娟.α-2b干扰素在 LEEP 刀治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变围术期应用的疗效分析[J].河北医学,2014，20(1):119-121.
[4]陈建英.LEEP刀宫颈环形电切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的疗效分析[J].临床军医杂志,2013,41(4):412-414.
[5]李春红.LEEP刀手术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变临床分析[J].河南外科学杂志,2016,22(4):103-104.
[6]陆维仙.LEEP刀治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的临床疗效分析[J].中国血液流变学杂志,2013,23(3):501-503.
[7]李亚里.人乳头瘤病毒感染与宫颈癌前病变的临床研究进展 [J].武警医学,2012,3(2):93-96.
[8]钱菊芬,陶爱群.宫颈环形电切术与冷刀锥切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变疗效比较[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2013,21(4):263-265.
[9]李俊强,刘绪义,陈晨,等.LEEP 治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变219例临床分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2015,31(11):874-877.
[10]Alston M J,Scaparotti A C,Krull M B,et al.Adherence to Management Recommendations in Patients Diagnosed With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2 or 3[J].Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease,2016,20(1):44.

相似文献/References:

[1]王艳妮,杨静秀.宫颈上皮内瘤变病因及诊断的相关研究进展[J].医学信息,2018,31(02):46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.02.016]
　WANG Yan-ni,YANG Jing-xiu.Research Progress on the Causes and Diagnosis of Cervical Intraepithelial Tumor[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(09):46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.02.016]
[2]刘丽娜.宫颈上皮内瘤变行子宫颈环形电切除术的临床观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(10):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.10.034]
　LIU Li-na.Clinical Observation of Cervical Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure for Cervical Epithelial Neoplasia[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(09):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.10.034]
[3]车 莹.HPV感染与宫颈病变相关性的研究[J].医学信息,2022,35(09):84.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.09.021]
　CHE Ying.Study on the Correlation Between HPV Infection and Cervical Lesions[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(09):84.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.09.021]
[4]国 萍,李 青.ASCUS患者发生宫颈高级别病变高危因素分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(23):96.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.23.026]
　GUO Ping,LI Qing.Analysis of High Risk Factors of Cervical Lesions in Patients with ASCUS[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(09):96.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.23.026]
[5]李佩佩,高火菊,徐小芳,等.LEEP刀联合臭氧治疗前庭大腺脓肿患者的临床研究[J].医学信息,2022,35(20):99.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.20.026]
　LI Pei-pei,GAO Huo-ju,XU Xiao-fang,et al.Clinical Study of LEEP Knife Combined with Ozone in the Treatment of Patients with Vestibular Gland Abscess[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(09):99.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.20.026]
[6]王宏景.宫颈癌筛查中阴道镜检查阳性与宫颈病理诊断价值比较[J].医学信息,2021,34(15):187.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.15.053]
　WANG Hong-jing.Comparison of Positive Colposcopy and Cervical Pathological Diagnosis Value in Cervical Cancer Screening[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(09):187.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.15.053]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-05-01