[1]武 杰.急性胃出血患者的急诊治疗及症状转归分析[J].医学信息,2019,32(18):96-98.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.18.031]
　WU Jie.Emergency Treatment and Symptom Outcome Analysis of Patients with Acute Gastric Hemorrhage[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(18):96-98.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.18.031]
点击复制

急性胃出血患者的急诊治疗及症状转归分析()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
32卷
期数:
2019年18期
页码:
96-98
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2019-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Emergency Treatment and Symptom Outcome Analysis of Patients with Acute Gastric Hemorrhage
文章编号:
1006-1959（2019）18-0096-03
作者:
武 杰
佳木斯市中心医院二部急诊科，黑龙江 佳木斯 154002
Author(s):
WU Jie
Emergency Department,Subject Two,Jiamusi Central Hospital,Jiamusi 154002,Heilongjiang,China
关键词:
急性胃出血; 急诊手术; 保守治疗; 止血时间; 血红蛋白
Keywords:
Key words：Acute gastric hemorrhage; Emergency surgery; Conservative treatment; Gemostasis time;  Hemoglobin
分类号:
R573
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.18.031
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨急诊内镜手术治疗急性胃出血患者的临床疗效及症状转归情况。方法 选择2018年1月~2019年1月我院收治的108例急性胃出血患者，两组患者均行内镜手术治疗，按手术时机分为对照组和观察组，每组54例。对照组择期手术，观察组行急诊手术治疗，比较两组临床疗效、症状缓解时间、住院时间和止血时间等指标。结果 观察组治疗总有效率为94.44%，高于对照组的77.78%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组恶心、呕血、便血及腹部灼烧感改善时间分别为[（2.45±0.34）d、（1.98±0.37）d、（2.26±0.44）d、（1.65±0.88）d]，较对照组的[（4.56±0.54）d、（3.98±0.61）d、（3.19±0.56）d、（2.98±0.14）d]缩短，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组治疗后止血时间为（2.76±0.61）d、住院时间为（6.63±1.20）d，短于对照组的（4.97±1.54）d、（8.65±2.55）d， 差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 急性胃出血患者应用急诊手术治疗效果优于择期手术治疗，能有效、迅速控制出血，缓解疾病症状，提高临床疗效。
Abstract:
Abstract：Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and symptomatic outcome of emergency endoscopic surgery for patients with acute gastric hemorrhage.Methods 108 patients with acute gastric hemorrhage admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to January 2019 were enrolled. Endoscopic surgery was performed in both groups. The operation time was divided into control group and observation group, with 54 cases in each group. The control group underwent elective surgery, and the observation group underwent emergency surgery. The clinical efficacy, time to symptom relief, hospitalization time and hemostasis time were compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rate of the observation group was 94.44%, which was higher than that of the control group 77.78%,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The improvement time of nausea, hematemesis, blood in the stool and abdominal burning was observed in the observation group [(2.45±0.34)d, (1.98±0.37)d, (2.26±0.44)d, (1.65±0.88)d], compared with the control group [(4.56±0.54)d, (3.98±0.61)d, (3.19±0.56) d, (2.98±0.14) d] shortened, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); the observation group had a hemostasis time of (2.76±0.61) d and a hospital stay of (6.63±1.20) d,they were all shorter than the control group (4.97±1.54) d and (8.65±2.55) d,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion The application of emergency surgery in patients with acute gastric hemorrhage is better than elective surgery, which can effectively and quickly control bleeding, alleviate disease symptoms and improve clinical efficacy.

参考文献/References:

[1]王建平,李杰.奥美拉唑在治疗急性胃出血中的临床应用[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2017,22(5):694-696. [2]郑林辉.老年急性胃出血患者急诊手术的抢救效果及预后[J].中国老年学杂志,2017,37(5):1186-1187. [3]中国医师协会急诊医师分会.急性上消化道出血急诊诊治专家共识[J].中国急救医学,2010,30(4):289-293. [4]张志勇.急性胃出血手术治疗的临床疗效观察[J].深圳中西医结合杂志,2015,25(5):93-94. [5]咸利军,张岩.急性胃出血的急诊胃镜治疗及临床应用效果探究[J].中国现代药物应用,2017,11(21):53-54. [6]朱勇.急诊手术治疗急性胃出血的临床效果[J].中外医学研究,2017,15(4):106-107. [7]伍建平.分析急性胃出血急诊治疗及临床效果[J].中国实用医药,2018,13(7):42-43. [8]Chen TH,Chang CY,Lee CT.A case with gastric purpura induced acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage[J].Advances in Digestive Medicine,2017,4(1):39-40. [9]Al-Bawardy B,Gorospe EC,Saleem A,et al.Outcomes and Predictors of Rebleeding After 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate Injection in Acute Gastric Variceal Hemorrhage[J].J Clin Gastroenterol,2016,50(6):458-463. [10]丁高潮.急性胃出血的急诊治疗及临床效果评价[J].现代诊断与治疗,2015,26(17):4021-4022. [11]葛玉珍.急诊手术治疗急性胃出血的临床效果观察[J].中国现代药物应用,2016,10(5):183-184. [12]吴栋平,杨应林.180例早期胃出血患者的临床手术治疗及保守治疗的疗效及预后分析[J].浙江创伤外科,2016,21(2):261-263. [13]刘艳,殷杰.回顾性分析我院2012-2015年急诊胃出血内镜手术治疗体会[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2017,22(1):85-87.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-09-15