[1]呼蓓蓓.围产期孕妇B族链球菌感染的筛查方法对结果的影响[J].医学信息,2019,32(10):171-172.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.057]
　HU Bei-bei.Effect of Screening Methods for Group B StreptococcusInfection in Perinatal Women on Outcomes[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(10):171-172.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.057]
点击复制

围产期孕妇B族链球菌感染的筛查方法对结果的影响()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
32卷
期数:
2019年10期
页码:
171-172
栏目:
诊疗技术
出版日期:
2019-05-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Screening Methods for Group B StreptococcusInfection in Perinatal Women on Outcomes
文章编号:
1006-1959（2019）10-0171-02
作者:
呼蓓蓓
（天津市和平区妇产科医院检验科，天津 300041）
Author(s):
HU Bei-bei
(Department of Clinical Laboratory,Tianjin Heping District Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Tianjin 300041,China)
关键词:
围产期孕妇; B族链球菌; GBS检查; 显色平板
Keywords:
Perinatal pregnant women; Group B streptococcus; GBS examination; Chromogenic plate
分类号:
R714.7
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.057
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 通过比较聚合酶链反应（PCR）、显色平板法两种筛查方法，探讨围产期孕妇B族链球菌（GBS）感染的合适快速检测方法。方法 选取2016年5月~2018年5月我院152例常规产检的围产期孕妇，采集孕妇阴道分泌物后分别做PCR检测与显色平板法，并对结果进行质谱检测确认。比较两种方法对GBS的阳性检出率。结果 PCR检测方法的阳性检出率为 6.58%（10/152），灵敏度为77.27%（17/22），显色平板法的阳性检出率11.18%（17/152），灵敏度为50.00%（10/22）。结论 两种筛查方法均能检测GBS，应用显色平板法对筛查围产期孕妇的GBS感染灵敏度更高。临床中对围产期孕妇的GBS 筛查采用显色平板培养的方法能提高GBS的检出率。
Abstract:
Objective A suitable rapid detection method for infection of group B streptococcus (GBS) in perinatal women was conducted by comparing two methods of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and chromogenic plate method. Methods From May 2016 to May 2018, 152 cases of perinatal pregnant women in our hospital were selected. The vaginal secretions of pregnant women were collected and PCR detection and chromogenic plate method were performed respectively. The results were confirmed by mass spectrometry. The positive detection rate of GBS was compared between the two methods. Results The positive detection rate of PCR detection method was 6.58% (10/152), the sensitivity was 77.27% (17/22), the positive detection rate of chromogenic plate method was 11.18% (17/152), and the sensitivity was 50.00%(10/22). Conclusion Both screening methods can detect GBS, and the chromogenic plate method is more sensitive to screening GBS infection in perinatal women. In clinical practice, GBS screening for perinatal pregnant women can improve the detection rate of GBS by using chromogenic plate culture.

参考文献/References:

[1]冯莹,许成芳,饶燕珍,等.妊娠晚期孕妇B族链球菌感染筛查与妊娠结局的临床研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2019,29(3):440-442,447.
[2]黄满辉,张龙绘,李珍宇,等.B族链球菌核酸检测在产前筛查中的应用[J].中国医药科学,2015,5(24):81-84.
[3]Saito M,Yamamoto S,Ozaki K,et al.A soluble form of Siglec-9 provides a resistance against Group B Streptococcus (GBS) infection in transgenic mice[J].Microbial Pathogenesis,2016,99(8):106-110.
[4]马勇,李莉.荧光PCR法检测妊娠孕晚期妇女B族链球菌感染的应用价值[J].中国实用医药,2016,11(10):92-93.
[5]Dzanibe S,Adrian PV,Kimaro Mlacha SZ,et al.Reduced trans-placental transfer of group B Streptococcus surface protein antibodies in HIV-infected mother-newborn dyads[J].Journal of Infectious Diseases,2017,215(3):415-419.
[6]Helmig RB,Gertsen JB.Diagnostic accuracy of polymerase chain reaction for intrapartum detection of group B Streptococcus colonization[J].Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica,2017,96(9):1070-1074.
[7]廖宗琳,陈丽霞,沈宏志,等.围产期孕妇生殖道B族链球菌感染的影响因素分析及对妊娠结局的影响[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2018,28(2):247-249,253.

相似文献/References:

[1]查固长.南昌市围生期孕妇B族链球菌感染情况及耐药分析[J].医学信息,2020,33(07):135.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.07.043]
　ZHA Gu-chang.Infection Status and Drug Resistance Analysis of Group B Streptococcus in Pregnant Women During Perinatal Period in Nanchang[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(10):135.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.07.043]

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-05-15