[1]王晓琼,曾凡玲.体检者胃溃疡检出率及其影响因素分析[J].医学信息,2019,32(23):132-134.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.23.039]
　WANG Xiao-qiong,ZENG Fan-ling.Analysis of the Detection Rate of Gastric Ulcer and its Influencing Factors in Physical Examination Patients[J].Medical Information,2019,32(23):132-134.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.23.039]
点击复制

体检者胃溃疡检出率及其影响因素分析()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
32卷
期数:
2019年23期
页码:
132-134
栏目:
调查分析
出版日期:
2019-12-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of the Detection Rate of Gastric Ulcer and its Influencing Factors in Physical Examination Patients
文章编号:
1006-1959（2019）23-0132-03
作者:
王晓琼; 曾凡玲
（重庆医科大学附属第一医院健康管理中心，重庆 400016）
Author(s):
WANG Xiao-qiong; ZENG Fan-ling
(Health Management Center,the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016,China)
关键词:
体检; 健康管理中心; 胃溃疡; 影响因素
Keywords:
Physical examination; Health management center; Gastric ulcer; Influencing factors
分类号:
R656.6+2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.23.039
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 调查体检者胃溃疡的检出情况及其发生的影响因素。方法 收集2018年1月~12月我院健康管理中心9125名体检者的体检资料，根据胃镜检查及/或病理检查结果将体检者分为胃溃疡组519例和非溃疡组8606例，比较两组一般资料（年龄、性别、教育程度、BMI、吸烟、饮酒、Hp感染状况、饮食、每日睡眠时间、体检季节），采用Logistic回归模型分析胃溃疡发生的影响因素。结果 共9125名体检者，胃溃疡检出率5.69%。单因素分析结果显示，两组年龄、性别、教育程度、吸烟、饮酒人数、Hp感染状况、饮食、每日睡眠时间、体检季节比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示，受教育程度是胃溃疡的保护因素，年龄、男性、吸烟、饮酒、饮食不规律、日睡眠时间＜8 h、Hp阳性、冬春季节是发生胃溃疡的风险因素（P＜0.05）。结论 9125名体检者胃溃疡检出率较低，受教育程度高是胃溃疡发生的保护因素，年龄增加、男性、吸烟/饮酒、Hp阳性，饮食不规律、日睡眠时间＜8 h、冬春季节均是增加胃溃疡发生风险的独立影响因素。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the detection of gastric ulcer and its influencing factors in medical examiners.Methods The physical examination data of 9125 medical examiners from January to December 2018 in our hospital health management center were collected. According to the results of gastroscopy and/or pathological examination, the physical examination was divided into 519 cases of gastric ulcer group and 8606 cases of non-ulcer group. General data (age, gender, education level, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, Hp infection status, diet, daily sleep time, physical examination season) were analyzed. Logistic regression model was used to analyze the influencing factors of gastric ulcer. Results A total of 9125 physical examination patients, the detection rate of gastric ulcer was 5.69%. Univariate analysis showed that the differences in age, gender, education level, smoking, alcohol consumption, Hp infection status, diet, daily sleep time, and physical examination season were statistically significant (P<0.05); multivariate logistic regression the results of the analysis showed that the education level was the protective factor of gastric ulcer. Age, male, smoking, drinking, irregular diet, daily sleep time <8 h, Hp positive, winter and spring were risk factors for gastric ulcer (P<0.05). Conclusion The detection rate of gastric ulcer in 9125 physical examination patients is low. The high education level is the protective factor for gastric ulcer. The age is increased, male, smoking/drinking, Hp positive, irregular diet, daily sleep time <8 h, winter and spring. Seasons are independent factors that increase the risk of gastric ulcer.

参考文献/References:

[1]王倩.580例健康体检者电子胃镜检查结果分析[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2017,22(4):30-32.[2]程红.胃及十二指肠溃疡的病因探讨及治疗效果分析[J].现代医学与健康研究电子杂志,2017,1(2):65-66.[3]王泽陇.胃及十二指肠溃疡的病因探讨及治疗效果分析[J].世界临床医学,2016,10(20):70.[4]朱红.胃溃疡患者饮食行为及心理社会因素与溃疡愈合的关系[J].国际护理学杂志,2018,37(11):1471-1474.[5]王银燕.慢性胃溃疡的诊治进展[J].中外医学研究,2015,13(10):156-158.[7]Pioche M,Jacques J,Saurin JC.Gastric and duodenal ulcer.Gastritis[J].Rev Prat,2019,69(5):e147-e154.[7]李东辉.消化性溃疡内科药物治疗的研究现状[J].海峡药学,2015,27(4):151-153.[8]Sandhu BK,Fell JM,Beattie RM,et al.Guidelines for the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children in the United Kingdom[J].Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition,2010,50(Suppl 1):S1-S13.[9]李艺武.胃溃疡的临床治疗及影响因素分析研究[J].中西医结合心血管病电子杂志,2019,7(2):83.[10]曹春宇,刘祖炳,李松财,等.幽门螺杆菌感染及相关胃溃疡中基质金属蛋白酶的水平研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2015, 25(20):104-106.

相似文献/References:

[1]李 芸,柳 弥,王 冠,等.体检危急值预警情况及其实施意义分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(21):13.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.21.005]
　VLI Yun,LIU Mi,WANG Guan,et al.Analysis on the Situation of Physical Examination Critical Value Prewarning and Its Implementation Significance[J].Medical Information,2018,31(23):13.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.21.005]
[2]孙 艳.程序化和谐护理对体检中心体检护理质量及体检者满意度的影响效果分析[J].医学信息,2019,32(06):190.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.06.063]
　SUN Yan.Analysis of the Effect of Programmed Harmonious Nursing on the Quality of Physical Examination and the Satisfaction of Medical Examiners in Physical Examination Center[J].Medical Information,2019,32(23):190.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.06.063]
[3]胡慧斐,张燕敏,蒋孔阳,等.象山地区相对无症状体检人群电子直乙结肠镜息肉检出率及其与饮食习惯、血清肿瘤标志物的关系[J].医学信息,2020,33(20):122.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.20.037]
　HU Hui-fei,ZHANG Yan-min,JIANG Kong-yang,et al.Detection Rate of Electronic Sigmoidoscopy Polyps in Relatively Asymptomatic People in Xiangshan Area and Its Relationship with Eating Habits and Blood Tumor Markers[J].Medical Information,2020,33(23):122.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.20.037]

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-12-01